Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020-12-10 to 2020-12-19
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2011
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
2016
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Preparation of the test item solutions:

Out of the stock solution 5 concentrations were tested in a geometric series with a dilution factor of 2: 0.0313 – 0.0625 – 0.125 – 0.250 – 0.500 mg/L, corresponding to the geometric mean measured test item concentrations of 0.0209 – 0.0399 – 0.0905 – 0.176 – 0.375 mg/L. The concentrations are based on the results of a preliminary range finding test (non-GLP, open system with headspace).
Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green algae
- Strain: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDÁK, CCAP 278/4 (axenic)
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory Dunbeg, OBAN; Argyll PA37 1QA; Scotland, UK
- Method of cultivation: Fresh stocks were prepared every month on Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted to 2567–5130 lux for 24 h per day
- Culture medium: Nutrient medium Z according to LÜTTGE et al. (1994)
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
river water total hardness [mg CO3/l]: 347
Test temperature:
Nominal range: 21 - 24°C, controlled at ± 2°C
pH:
start: 8.18 - 8.20 (test concentrations 0.0209 - 0.375 mg/l), 8.18 (control); end: 8.22 - 8.39 (test concentrations 0.0209 - 0.375 mg/l), 8.32 (control)
Dissolved oxygen:
8.99 mg O2/L (river water)
Conductivity:
1001 µS/m (river water)
Nominal and measured concentrations:
0.0209, 0.0399, 0.0905, 0.176, 0.375 mg/L geometric mean measured test item concentration
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Sterile Erlenmeyer flasks, volume: 250 mL, provided with cotton wool plugs. The test container were pretreated with the appropriate test solutions for 72 hours under test conditions. Before the start of the exposure phase, the test container were emptied and refilled with freshly prepared test solutions.
- Fill volume: 100 mL
- Initial cells density: nominal: approximately 5 x 10 E03 - E04 cells/mL; actual: 5416 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 753084 (mean)
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: no, natural river water, for details see section "any other information on materials and methods"

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
river water as specified in section "any other information on materials and methods"

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: The natural river water was stored at 6 ± 2 °C and at - 18± 2 °C for at least 24 hours. Freezing was found to be suitable to minimize the content of vital natural algae cells of the water as well as to reduce microbial (bacterial) activity
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Light regime: 24 hours/day light
- Light intensity and quality: Approximately 4440 to 8880 lux, corresponding to 60 to 120 µE*m-2*s-1

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Chlorophyll measurement: Chlorophyll a-fluorescence, excitation at 436 nm, emission at 685 nm

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: delution factor of 2
Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0.0055 - 0.05 - 0.5 mg/L nominal
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:
Growth Rate Inhibition: 0.5: 100%, 0.05: 1%, 0.005: -4% each concentration mg/l nominal
Yield Inhibition: 0.5: 100%, 0.05: 4%, 0.005: -20% each concentration mg/l nominal
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
0.044 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
0.021 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
0.04 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC20
Effect conc.:
0.06 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
0.099 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): Microscopic evaluation of the cells at start and the end of the incubation period revealed no morphological abnormalities.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid?
- ErC50: 0.940 (95 % c.l. 0.732 - 1.33 mg/L); valid range: 0.758 ± 0.535
- EyC50: 0.660 (95 % c.l. 0.393 - 0.70), valid range: 0.414 ± 0.335
- Other: tested from 2019-03-05 to 2019-03-08
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Statistical Significance (NOEL/LOEL) – Growth Rate

t-test

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk): Passed (P = 0.222)
Equal Variance Test (Brown-Forsythe): Passed (P = 0.860)

The result of the equal variance test indicates the likelihood that the two groups are sampled from populations with equal variances. but does not guarantee the equality or inequality of the two variances.

Group Name N Missing Mean Std Dev SEM
Control 6 0 1.815 0.0237 0.00969
100 mg/L 6 0 1.816 0.0188 0.00767

Difference of means -0.001000
Use the results of Welch's test. where equal variances are not assumed. if the equality of the population variances of the two groups is in doubt.

Equal Variances Assumed (Student's t-test):

t = -0.0809 with 10 degrees of freedom.

95 percent two-tailed confidence interval for difference of means: -0.0285 to 0.0265
Two-tailed P-value = 0.937

The difference in the mean values of the two groups is not great enough to reject the possibility that the difference is due to random sampling variability. There is not a statistically significant difference between the input groups (P = 0.937).

Equal Variances Not Assumed (Welch's t-test):

t = -0.0809 with 9.501 degrees of freedom.

95 percent two-tailed confidence interval for difference of means: -0.0287 to 0.0267
Two-tailed P-value = 0.937

The difference in the mean values of the two groups is not great enough to reject the possibility that the difference is due to random sampling variability. There is not a statistically significant difference between the input groups (P = 0.937).

The program states no significant difference for the limit loading rate compared to the control.  

Table 4:    Cell Densities

Geometric mean measured test item concentration

Replicate

Cell density [cells/mL]

[mg/L]

No.

0 hours

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

0.375

1

5416

<LOQcell density

<LOQcell density

<LOQcell density

2

5416

<LOQcell density

<LOQcell density

<LOQcell density

3

5416

<LOQcell density

<LOQcell density

<LOQcell density

Mean

5416

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

0.176

1

5416

2632

3208

6743

2

5416

2812

8232

15488

3

5416

2924

5238

14957

Mean

5416

2789

5559

12396

0.0905

1

5416

8884

31158

84983

2

5416

8237

22897

90543

3

5416

8682

28147

89915

Mean

5416

8601

27401

88480

0.0399

1

5416

14422

87583

443049

2

5416

11559

78640

530990

3

5416

20083

99217

529797

Mean

5416

15355

88480

501279

0.0209

1

5416

21617

151821

718578

2

5416

20952

160233

762463

3

5416

19248

153087

695747

Mean

5416

20606

155047

725596

Control

1

5416

21390

168606

750731

2

5416

22291

162102

724468

3

5416

17294

144850

753676

4

5416

23939

149017

739194

5

5416

24309

177748

749879

6

5416

23951

199255

800555

Mean

5416

22196

166930

753084

LOQcell density            = Limit of quantification of the cell density (2280 cells/mL).      n.a.     = not applicable

 

Table 5: Evaluation after 72 hours

           Statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield compared to
             control values are marked (+), not significant differences are marked (-).

 

Geometric mean measured test item concentration

Replicate

Growth rate

Inhibition of growth rate

Yield

Inhibition of yield

[mg/L]

No.

[d-1]

[%]

[cells/mL]

[%]

0.375

1

 

n.a.

100

 

n.a.

100

2

 

n.a.

100

 

n.a.

100

3

 

n.a.

100

 

n.a.

100

Mean

(+)

n.a.

100

(+)

n.a.

100

0.176

1

 

0.073

96

 

1327

100

2

 

0.350

79

 

10072

99

3

 

0.339

79

 

9541

99

Mean

(+)

0.254

85

(+)

6980

99

0.0905

1

 

0.918

44

 

79567

89

2

 

0.939

43

 

85127

89

3

 

0.937

43

 

84499

89

Mean

(+)

0.931

43

(+)

83064

89

0.0399

1

 

1.47

11

 

437633

41

2

 

1.53

7

 

525574

30

3

 

1.53

7

 

524381

30

Mean

(+)

1.51

8

(+)

495863

34

0.0209

1

 

1.63

1

 

713162

5

2

 

1.65

0

 

757047

-1

3

 

1.62

2

 

690331

8

Mean

(-)

1.63

1

(-)

720180

4

Control

1

 

1.64

 

 

745315

 

2

 

1.63

 

 

719052

 

3

 

1.65

 

 

748260

 

4

 

1.64

 

 

733778

 

5

 

1.64

 

 

744463

 

6

 

1.67

 

 

795139

 

Mean

 

1.65

 

 

747668

 

n.a.     = not applicable

Table 6: Section-by-Section and Average Specific Growth Rates of the Control Group
(0 – 72 hours)

 

Replicate No.

Specific growth rate [d-1]

Mean

(0 - 72 hours)

SD

±

CV
[%]

Mean CV [%]

section-by-section

0 - 24 hours

24 - 48 hours

48 - 72 hours

Control

1

1.37

2.07

1.49

1.64

0.369

22.5

20.6

2

1.42

1.98

1.50

1.63

0.308

18.8

3

1.16

2.13

1.65

1.65

0.482

29.3

4

1.49

1.83

1.60

1.64

0.174

10.6

5

1.50

1.99

1.44

1.64

0.301

18.3

6

1.49

2.12

1.39

1.67

0.396

23.7

 

 

 

Mean

1.65

 

 

 

 

 

SD ±

0.01

 

 

 

 

CV [%]

0.68

 

 

SD = Standard deviationCV = Coefficient of variation

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
72 h NOEL of Quarternary ammonium compounds, tri-C8-C10-alkylmethyl, Me sulfates to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata based on growth rate and yield inhibition are 0.0209 mg/l based on geometric mean measured test item concentration.
ErC10 was 0.0445 mg/L, ErC50 was 0.099 mg/L, EyC10 was 0.0264 mg/L, EyC50 was 0.0487 mg/L based on geometric mean measured test item concentration.
Executive summary:

In a 72 hour toxicity study according to OECD Guideline 201 (2011), the cultures of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDÁK, CCAP 278/4 (axenic) were exposed to Quarternary ammonium compounds, tri-C8-C10-alkylmethyl, Me sulfates at concentrations of 0.0313 – 0.0625 – 0.125 – 0.250 – 0.500 mg/L in natural river water under static conditions.

72 h NOEL of Quarternary ammonium compounds, tri-C8-C10-alkylmethyl, Me sulfates to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata based on growth rate and yield inhibition are 0.0209 mg/l based on geometric mean measured test item concentration.

ErC10 was 0.0445 mg/L, ErC50 was 0.099 mg/L, EyC10 was 0.0264 mg/L, EyC50 was 0.0487 mg/L based on geometric mean measured test item concentration.

Microscopic evaluation of the cells at start and the end of the incubation period revealed no morphological abnormalities.

 

This toxicity study is classified as acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirements for the algal growth inhibition test in Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.

 

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
99 µg/L
EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
44.5 µg/L

Additional information

In a 72 hour toxicity study according to OECD Guideline 201 (2011), the cultures of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDÁK,CCAP 278/4 (axenic) were exposed to Quarternary ammonium compounds, tri-C8-C10-alkylmethyl, Me sulfates at concentrations of 0.0313 – 0.0625 – 0.125 – 0.250 – 0.500 mg/L in natural river water under static conditions.

72 h NOEL of Quarternary ammonium compounds, tri-C8-C10-alkylmethyl, Me sulfates to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata based on growth rate and yield inhibition are 0.0209 mg/l based on geometric mean measured test item concentration.

ErC10 was 0.0445 mg/L, ErC50 was 0.099 mg/L, EyC10 was 0.0264 mg/L, EyC50 was 0.0487 mg/L based on geometric mean measured test item concentration.

Microscopic evaluation of the cells at start and the end of the incubation period revealed no morphological abnormalities.