Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15 Jan 2018 - 18 Mar 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 830.7950 (Vapor Pressure)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
effusion method: isothermal thermogravimetry

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-(tri(hydroxymethyl)methyl)glycine
EC Number:
227-193-6
EC Name:
N-(tri(hydroxymethyl)methyl)glycine
Cas Number:
5704-04-1
Molecular formula:
C6H13NO5
IUPAC Name:
2-{[1,3-dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)propan-2-yl]amino}acetic acid
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Results and discussion

Vapour pressureopen allclose all
Key result
Temp.:
ca. 20 °C
Vapour pressure:
< 0.002 Pa
Key result
Temp.:
ca. 25 °C
Vapour pressure:
< 0.004 Pa

Any other information on results incl. tables

In the range of 100°C and 150°C no significant weight lost was observed. A log pversus1/T curve for the test item in the range of 110°C - 130°C could not be determined since the coefficient of correlation (r) was < 0.99 (data is archived in the raw data). From 160°C weight lost was observed. The weight loss was due to reaction and/or decomposition of the test item from 160°C.

Since no accurate vapour pressure could be calculated from the obtained results the weight losses of the test item were compared with the results of hexachlorobenzene at the same temperatures. The weight loss curve of this reference substance is shown inFigure 4. Since the weight loss of the test item was lower than the weight loss of the reference compound, the vapour pressure of the test item is considered to be below the vapour pressure of hexachlorobenzene.

             
Results of the Vapour pressure Isothermal TGA Analysis

Temperature

Weight loss

νT

log νT

log PT

PT

[°C]

[µg/min]

[g/cm2/h]

[Pa]

110

0.025469

3.04 ´ 10-6

-5.52

-1.93

1.2 x 10-2

110

0.015069

1.80 ´ 10-6

-5.75

-2.22

6.1 x 10-3

120

0.001492

1.78 ´ 10-7

-6.75

-3.5

3.1 x 10-4

120

0.024896

2.97 ´ 10-6

-5.53

-1.94

1.2 x 10-2

130

0.02485

2.97 ´ 10-6

-5.53

-1.94

1.2 x 10-2

130

0.064001

7.64 ´ 10-6

-5.12

-1.41

3.9 x 10-2

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The isothermal TGA effusion method was applied for the determination of the vapour pressure of the test substance. The vapour pressure was determined to be < 1.5 x 10-3 Pa at 20 degree C and < 4.0 x 10-3 at 25 degree C.
Executive summary:

The isothermal TGA effusion method was applied for the determination of the vapour pressure of the test substance. The vapour pressure was determined to be < 1.5 x 10-3 Pa at 20 degree C and < 4.0 x 10-3 at 25 degree C.