Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 942-764-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
A human insult patch test showed that the substance should not be considered as a primary irritant for skin. An in vitro Eye irritation study as well as an in vivo eye irritation performed with rabbit showed that the substance is not considered to be irritating for eyes.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1975
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No GLP study.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was performed to determine the possibility of the test item to induce skin irritation.
50 caucasian Humans (25 males and 25 females ) were used to performed the experiment.
The test material was evaluated at a concentration of 10% in 3% methyl cellulose.
The series of 9 induction patches was applied .
Based on the incidence and severity of the reactions, the test material will be considered as irritant or not to Human skin. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- other: Human
- Strain:
- other: Caucasian
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Age at study initiation: 21-38 for male (25) and 18-60 for female (25)
- Race: Caucasian - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: 3% methylcellulose
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.03 mlof HT 939 was applied.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- A patch with HT 939 was applied on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday and allowed to contact the skin for 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 50 caucasian Human (25 males and 25 females)
- Details on study design:
- Fifty human subjects were employed in the investigation.
A patch of HT 939 test material was applied on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday and allowed to contact the skin for 24 hours, after which time
it was removed and the skin site graded for irritation.
Skin application the test material was made using Readi-Band* "hypoallergenic nonirritating" clear plastic patches 1-1/2" x 1-1/2" square
with nonwoven Webril centers. Approximately 0.03 ml of the test materials was applied on the Webril center of the patch just prior to application.
SCORING SYSTEM:
Scoring Criteria for Skin Irritation Reactions
Erythema and Eschar Formation
- No reaction: 0
- Very slight erythema (barely perceptible): 1
- Mild, well-defined erythema: 2
- Moderate to severe erythema: 3
- Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth): 4
Total possible erythema score 4
Edema Formation
- No reaction: 0
- Very slight edema (barely perceptible): 1
- Slight edema (edge of area well -defined by definite raising: 2
- Moderate edema (area raised approximately 1 mm 3
- Severe edema (area raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure): 4
Total possible edema score 4
Total possible irritation score 8 - Remarks on result:
- other: Patch test performed on 50 Humans (25 males and 25 females). Based on the incidence and severity of the reactions, the test material would not be considered a primary skin irritant under the exaggerated test conditions.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based on the incidence and severity of the reactions, the test material would not be considered a primary skin irritant under the exaggerated test
conditions . - Executive summary:
The study was performed to determine to possibility of HT 939 to induce skin irritation.
50 caucasian Humans (25 males and 25 females ) were used to performed the experiment.
The test material was evaluated at a concentration of 10% in 3% methyl cellulose.
The series of 9 induction patches was applied according to the following schedule. A patch of each test material was applied on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday and allowed to contact the skin for 24 hours, after which time it was removed and the skin site graded for irritation.
Based on the incidence and severity of the reactions, the test material would not be considered a primary skin irritant under the exaggerated test conditions.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 09 September 2014 and 18 September 2014.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Two New Zealand White (Hsdlf:NZW) strain rabbits were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Leicestershire, UK. At the start of the study the animals weighed 2.54 or 2.97 kg and were twelve to twenty weeks old. After an acclimatization period of at least five days each animal was given a number unique within the study which was written with a black indelible marker pen on the inner surface of the ear and on the cage label.
The animals were individually housed in suspended cages. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2930C Teklad Global Rabbit diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet and drinking water were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 17 to 23 °C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
Justification
The rabbit is the preferred species of choice as historically used for irritation studies and is specified in the appropriate test guidelines. The number of animals used was the minimum required to achieve the objectives of the study. Testing was conducted in two animals and the response in those animals was such that exposure of a third animal would not affect classification of the test item, therefore, no further testing was needed. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A volume of 0.1 mL of the test item, which was found to weigh approximately 75 mg was used.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test substance was not removed from the test eye.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Two
- Details on study design:
- Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the provisionally selected test rabbits were examined for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. Only animals free of ocular damage were used.
Initially, a single rabbit was treated. A subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine 0.01 mg/kg was administered 60 minutes prior to test item application to provide a therapeutic level of systemic analgesia. Five minutes prior to test item application, a pre dose anesthesia of ocular anesthetic (two drops of 0.5% tetracaine hydrochloride) was applied to each eye.
A volume of 0.1 mL of the test item, which was found to weigh approximately 75 mg (as measured by gently compacting the required volume into an adapted syringe) was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test item, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Immediately after administration of the test item, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made.
Eight hours after test item application, a subcutaneous injection of post dose analgesia, buprenorphine 0.01 mg/kg and meloxicam 0.5 mg/kg, was administered to provide a continued therapeutic level of systemic analgesia. The treated animal was checked for signs of pain and suffering approximately 12 hours later. No further analgesia was required.
After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal, a second animal was similarly treated.
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical evaluation (Draize, J.H, 1977).
Any other ocular effects were also noted. Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.
Any clinical signs of toxicity, if present, were also recorded.
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and at the end of the observation period. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- Male 74697
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- Male 74710
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Remarks:
- Male 74697
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Remarks:
- Male 74710
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Male 74697
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Male 74710
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- Male 74697
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- Male 74710
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not classified
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 hour
- Score:
- 9
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 8
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 hours
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Classed as a mild irritant according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system; not classified according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
- Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No corneal or iridial effects were noted during the study.
Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in both treated eyes 1 and 24 hours after treatment with minimal conjunctival irritation noted at the 48 Hour observation.
Both treated eyes appeared normal at the 72 Hour observation. - Other effects:
- Body Weight
Both animals showed expected gain in body weight during the study. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 9.0 and was classified as a mild irritant (Class 4 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures. - Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test item to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit.
Results
A single application of the test item to the non-irrigated eye of two rabbits produced moderate conjunctival irritation. Both treated eyes appeared normal at the 72‑Hour observation.
Conclusion
The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 9.0 and was classified as a mild irritant (Class4on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
Reference
Individual Scores and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
74697Male |
74710Male |
||||||
IPR= 0 |
IPR = 0 |
|||||||
Time After Treatment |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
CORNEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E = Degree of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F = Area of Cornea Involved |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (E x F) x 5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
IRIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (D x 5) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CONJUNCTIVAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A = Redness |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
B = Chemosis |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
C = Discharge |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Score (A + B + C) x 2 |
10 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
Total Score |
10 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
IPR=Initial pain reaction
Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
Individual Total Scores At: |
||||||||
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
||||||
74697Male |
10 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
|||||
74710Male |
8 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
|||||
Group Total |
18 |
16 |
8 |
0 |
|||||
Group Mean Score |
9.0 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
Individual Body Weights and Body Weight Change
Rabbit Number |
Individual Body Weight (kg) |
Body Weight Change (kg) |
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
||
74697Male |
2.54 |
2.61 |
0.07 |
74710Male |
2.97 |
3.04 |
0.07 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
only existing study
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
In vivo study
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above stated assessment of the skin irritation potential, the substance does not have to be classified for skin irritation according to Council Directive 2001/59/EC and according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Of the European parliament and of the Council.
Base on the above assessment of the eye irritation potential, the substance does not have to be classified as for risk of serious damage to eyes according to Council Directive 2001/59/EC and according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Of the European parliament and of the Council.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.