Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-708-6 | CAS number: 688-84-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24 July 2013 - 14 August 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- OECD 429, GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- individual approach (adopted 22 July 2010)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- (dated May 30, 2008)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- OECD Principles of GLP, as revised in 1997, ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate
- EC Number:
- 211-708-6
- EC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate
- Cas Number:
- 688-84-6
- Molecular formula:
- C12H22O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Ethylhexyl methacrylate (CAS: 688-84-6)
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state at room temperature: liquid
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/CaOlaHsd
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories B.V., Postbus 6174, 5960 AD Horst / The Netherlands
- Age at study: Pre-test: 10 - 11 weeks (beginning of treatment)
Main study: 9 - 10 weeks (beginning of treatment)
- Weight at study initiation (main experiment): 19.8 - 25.0 g (mean)
- Housing: group, Makrolon Type II (pre-test) / III (main sudy), with wire mesh top
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): 2018C Teklad Global 18% protein rodent diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days prior to the start of dosing under test conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Temperature 22 ±2°C
- Humidity (%): Relative humidity 45 - 94%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Artificial light 6.00 a.m. - 6.00 p.m.
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- Test concentrations (main study): 0 (vehicle group), 25, 50 100 % (w/w)
Test concentrations (pre-test): 50 and 100% - No. of animals per dose:
- Main study: 5 females (nulliparous and non-pregnant)
Pre-test: 2 females - Details on study design:
- In order to study a possible allergenic potential of 2-Ethylhexyl methacrylate, three groups each of five female mice were treated with different concentrations of the test item by topical application at the dorsum of each ear lobe (left and right) on three consecutive days. A control group of five mice was treated with the vehicle only. Five days after the first topical application, the mice were intravenously injected into a tail vein with radio-labelled thymidine (3H-methyl thymidine). Approximately five hours after intravenous injection, the mice were sacrificed and the draining auricular lymph nodes excised and pooled per animal. Single cell suspensions of lymph node cells were prepared from pooled lymph nodes, which were subsequently washed and incubated with trichloroacetic acid overnight. The proliferative capacity of pooled lymph node cells was determined by the incorporation of 3H-methyl thymidine measured in a beta-scintillation counter.
Experimental Design and Procedures
Topical Application
Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface of each ear lobe (left and right) with different test item concentrations of 25, 50, and 100% (w/v) in acetone:olive oil (4+1 v/v). The application volume, 25 µL/ear/day, was spread over the entire dorsal surface (Ø ̴ 8 mm) of each ear lobe once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone (control animals).
Administration of 3H-Methyl Thymidine
Five days after the first topical application (day 6), all mice were administered 250 µL of phosphate-buffered saline containing 78.3 µCi/ml 3HTdR (corresponds to 19.6 µCi 3HTdR per mouse) by intravenous injection via a tail vein.
Determination of Incorporated 3HTdR
Approximately five hours after treatment with 3HTdR all mice were euthanised by using CO2, which was, after harvesting of the lymph nodes, followed by cervical dislocation to ensure death.
The draining lymph nodes were rapidly excised and pooled per animal (2 nodes per animal). Single cell suspensions (in phosphate buffered saline) of pooled lymph node cells were prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation through stainless steel gauze (200 µm mesh size). After washing two times with phosphate buffered saline (approx. 10 mL) the lymph node cells were resuspended in 5 % trichloroacetic acid (approx. 3 mL) and incubated at approximately +4 °C for at least 18 hours for precipitation of macromolecules. The precipitates were then resuspended in 5 % trichloroacetic acid (1 ml) and transferred to scintillation vials with 10 mL scintillation liquid and thoroughly mixed.
The level of 3HTdR incorporation was then measured on a beta-scintillation counter. Similarly, background 3HTdR levels were also measured in two 1mL-aliquots of 5 % trichloroacetic acid. The beta-scintillation counter expresses 3HTdR incorporation as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute (DPM).
Interpretation of Raw Data
The proliferative response of lymph node cells is expressed as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph nodes of each animal (DPM/animal) and as the ratio of 3HTdR incorporated into lymph node cells of test animals relative to that recorded for lymph nodes of control animals (stimulation index, S.I.). Before DPM/animal values were determined, mean scintillation-background DPM was subtracted from test and control raw data.
A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the following criteria are fulfilled:
- First, that exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than
that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the stimulation index.
- Second, that the data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high topical
concentrations) for either local toxicity or immunological suppression.
Observations
In addition to the sensitising reactions the following observations and data were recorded during the test and observation period:
Mortality / Viability: once daily (week day) from experimental start to necropsy.
Body weights: prior to the first application and prior to treatment with 3HTdR.
Ear thickness: pre-test: prior to the first application of the test item (day1) on day 3 and before sacrifice (day 6)
Ear weights: pre-test after sacrifice; biopsy punches were taken from each ear.
Clinical signs (local / systemic): Clinical signs (local irritation at the application site or systemic toxicity) were recorded at least once daily. Especially
the treatment sites were observed carefully. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- The mean values and standard deviations were calculated in the body weight tables. The Dean-Dixon-Test was used for identification of possible outliers (performed with Microsoft Excel 2007).
Biological and statistical significance were considered together.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Results of the GLP Positive Control
Experiment performed in April 2013.
Positive control substance: alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
Vehicle: acetone:olive oil (4+1)
Test item concentration % (w/v) Group Measurement DPM Calculation Result
DPM-BG a) number of lymph nodes DPM per lymph node b) S.I.
--- BG I 22 --- --- --- ---
--- BG II 18 --- --- --- ---
0 1 2201 2181.0 8 272.6 1.0
5 2 3518 3498.0 8 437.3 1.6
10 3 5251 5231.0 8 653.9 2.4
25 4 12915 12895.0 8 1611.9 5.9
BG = Background (1 ml 5% trichloroacetic acid) in duplicate
1 = Control Group
2-4 = Test Group
S.I. = Stimulation Index
a) = The mean value was taken from the figures BG I and BG II
b) = Since the lymph nodes of the animals of a dose group were pooled, DPM/node was determined by dividing the
measured value by the number of lymph nodes pooled
Calculation EC3:
Test conc. % S.I.
Test Group 3 10 (a) 2.4 (b)
Test Group 4 25 (c) 5.9 (d)
EC3 = (a-c) [(3-d)/(b-d)] + c = 12.6 % (w/v)
EC3 = Estimated concentration for a S.I. of 3.
a,b,c,d = Co-ordinates of the two pairs of data lying immediately above and below the S.I. value of 3 on the LLNA dose response plot.
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- EC3
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- A clear dose response was observed.
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Vehicle control group (negative control with vehicle, only): 128.9 DPM per lymph node (2 lymph nodes) Test substance: 25% DPM/lymph node: 196.9 50% DPM/lymph node: 342.3 100% DPM/lymph node: 367.1
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.53
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25 %
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- A clear dose response was observed.
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.66
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50 %
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- A clear dose response was observed.
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.85
- Test group / Remarks:
- 100 %
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- A clear dose response was observed.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Calculation and Results of Individual Data
Vehicle: acetone/olive oil (4+1 v/v)
Test item concentration |
DPM values measured |
DPM-BG per animal |
S.I.b) |
||
% |
Group no. |
Animal no. |
|||
--- |
--- |
BG I |
22 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
BG II |
25 |
--- |
--- |
0 |
1 |
1 |
108 |
84.5 |
--- |
0 |
1 |
2 |
176 |
152.5 |
--- |
0 |
1 |
3 |
99 |
75.5 |
--- |
0 |
1 |
4 |
129 |
105.5 |
--- |
0 |
1 |
5 |
250 |
226.5 |
--- |
25 |
2 |
6 |
239 |
215.5 |
1.7 |
25 |
2 |
7 |
208 |
184.5 |
1.4 |
25 |
2 |
8 |
282 |
258.5 |
2.0 |
25 |
2 |
9 |
240 |
216.5 |
1.7 |
25 |
2 |
10 |
133 |
109.5 |
0.8 |
50 |
3 |
11 |
299 |
275.5 |
2.1 |
50 |
3 |
12 |
295 |
271.5 |
2.1 |
50 |
3 |
13 |
454 |
430.5 |
3.3 |
50 |
3 |
14 |
347 |
323.5 |
2.5 |
50 |
3 |
15 |
434 |
410.5 |
3.2 |
100 |
4 |
16 |
333 |
309.5 |
2.4 |
100 |
4 |
17 |
283 |
259.5 |
2.0 |
100 |
4 |
18 |
373 |
349.5 |
2.7 |
100 |
4 |
19 |
442 |
418.5 |
3.2 |
100 |
4 |
20 |
522 |
498.5 |
3.9 |
1 = Control Group
2-4= Test Group
a) = values corrected for mean background value (BGI and BGII)
b) = Stimulation Indices relative to the mean of the control group (Group 1)
Calculation and Results of SI per Dose Group
Vehicle: acetone : olive oil (4 +1)
Test item concentration % (w/v) |
Group |
Measurement DPM |
Group Calculation |
Result |
||
mean DPM per animal (2 lymph nodes)a) |
SD
|
S.I. |
||||
--- |
BG I |
22 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
--- |
BG II |
25 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
--- |
CG1 |
--- |
128.9 |
62.2 |
1.0 |
|
25 |
2 |
--- |
196.9 |
55.5 |
1.53 |
|
50 |
3 |
--- |
342.3 |
74.6 |
2.66 |
|
100 |
4 |
--- |
367.1 |
93.7 |
2.85 |
BG = Background (1 ml 5% trichloroacetic acid) in duplicate
CG1= Control Group
2-4 = Test Group
S.I. = Stimulation Index
a) = Mean DPM/animal was determined by dividing the sum of the measured values from lymph nodes of all animals within a group by the number of animals in that group (5 animals)
The EC3 value could not be calculated, since all SI´s are below 3.
Viability / Mortality
No deaths occurred during the study period.
Clinical Signs
No systemic findings were observed during the study period. On day 4 the animals treated with a concentration of 50% showed an erythema of the ear skin (Score 1) and animals treated with 100% of Ethylhexyl methacrylate showed an erythema of the ear skin (Score 2). On days 5 and 6 the ear skin erythema of the 100% dose group decreased to Score 1.
Body Weights
The body weight of the animals, recorded prior to the first application and prior to treatment with3HTdR, was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age.
The individual body weight values are included in the following table:
Tables of Body Weights
Animal No. |
Dose Group |
Initial Weight (g) |
weight prior to treatment with3HTdR (g) |
1 |
1 |
24.2 |
22.4 |
2 |
1 |
23.4 |
24.2 |
3 |
1 |
23.0 |
23.0 |
4 |
1 |
19.8 |
20.2 |
5 |
1 |
20.7 |
19.7 |
6 |
2 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
7 |
2 |
20.7 |
22.0 |
8 |
2 |
21.3 |
22.2 |
9 |
2 |
20.6 |
21.7 |
10 |
2 |
21.3 |
21.1 |
11 |
3 |
23.8 |
23.4 |
12 |
3 |
22.0 |
21.1 |
13 |
3 |
24.8 |
24.0 |
14 |
3 |
20.8 |
22.4 |
15 |
3 |
21.1 |
21.8 |
16 |
4 |
21.2 |
22.7 |
17 |
4 |
21.3 |
21.9 |
18 |
4 |
20.0 |
21.7 |
19 |
4 |
25.0 | 23.3 |
20 |
4 |
23.6 | 24.6 |
Mean | 22.1 | 22.3 | |
Standard Deviation | 1.6 |
1.3 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of a fully valid Local Lymph node assay (OECD 429, GLP), 2-Ethylhexyl methacrylate is not considered to be a skin sensitizer.
CLP EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008) classification: not sensitizing - Executive summary:
In a dermal sensitization study with 2 -Ethylhexyl methacrylate (99.23%) dissolved in acetone : olive oil (4 +1) as a vehicle, 20 (5 per dose group) 9 - 10 week old female CBA/CaOlaHsd mice were tested using the method of OECD 429 (Local Lymph node Assay). 2-Ethylhexyl methacrylate, three groups each of five female mice were treated daily with the test item at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100% (w/w) in acetone:olive oil (4+1) by topical application to the dorsum of each ear lobe (left and right) for three consecutive days. A control group of five mice was treated with the vehicle (acetone:olive oil (4+1)) only. Five days after the first topical application the mice were injected intravenously into a tail vein with radio-labelled thymidine (3H-methyl thymidine). Approximately five hours after intravenous injection, the mice were sacrificed, the draining auricular lymph nodes excised and pooled per animal. Single cell suspensions of lymph node cells were prepared from pooled lymph nodes, which were subsequently washed and incubated with trichloroacetic acid overnight. The proliferative capacity of pooled lymph node cells was determined by the incorporation of3H-methyl thymidine measured in a beta-scintillation counter.
The validation-/positive control experiment was performed with alpha-Hexyl cinnamic aldehyde dissolved in acetone/olive oil (4 +1 v/v). In the course of the study no cases of mortality and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed.
On day 4 the animals treated with a concentration of 50% showed an erythema of the ear skin (Score 1) and animals treated with 100% of Ethylhexyl methacrylate showed an erythema of the ear skin (Score 2). On days 5 and 6 the ear skin erythema of the 100% dose group decreased to Score 1.
A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the exposure to one or more test concentration resulted in 3-fold or greater increase in incorporation of3HTdR compared with concurrent controls, as indicated by the Stimulation Index (S.I.). The estimated concentration of test item required to produce a S.I. of 3 is referred to as the EC3 value. In this study Stimulation Indices of 1.53, 2.66, and 2.85 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100% in acetone:olive oil (4+1). A clear dose response was observed.
Therefore, 2-Ethylhexyl methacrylate was not a skin sensitiser when tested in this fully valid Local Lymph Node Assay according to OECD TG 429.
CLP EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008) classification: not sensitizing
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)