Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Accpetable documented study report with restriction (test substance purity not indicated; the study is limited concerning the recommended particle-size distribution given in current guidelines and thus an exposure of all relevant regions of the respiratory tract was presumably not given. The biologically relevance of findings from this study, especially systemic effects are questionable, whereas local effects noted in the inhalation study could be used for supporting purpose.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 412 (Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study)
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-tert-butylbenzothiazole-2-sulphenamide
EC Number:
202-409-1
EC Name:
N-tert-butylbenzothiazole-2-sulphenamide
Cas Number:
95-31-8
Molecular formula:
C11H14N2S2
IUPAC Name:
N-tert-butylbenzothiazole-2-sulphenamide
Details on test material:
Santocure NS, lot no. MIC 270582

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
other: unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks on MMAD:
MMAD / GSD: aerodynamic mass medium diameter: 8.4 micrometer with a geometric standard deviation of 4.31
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
6 hours/day, 5 days/week
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0.0, 0.0024, 0.029, 0.084 mg/L
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 animals per dose and sex
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
Post-exposure period: no

Results and discussion

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
other:
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
Effect level not specified

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Nominal concentrations: 0.058, 0.17 and 0.52 mg/l Analytical concentrations: mean analytical concentrations: 0.0024, 0.029 and 0.084 mg/l

Gravimetric concentrations: mean gravimetric concentrations: 0.0024, 0.028, 0.088 mg/l

Dust particle size distribution analyses: the equivalent aerodynamic mass medium diameter: 8.4 μm , geometric standard deviation of 4.31

Clinical studies Appearance and general behavior: Nasal irritation was observed in the rats and ranged in severity from slight to market. The symptom was usually present after exposure and had generally disappeared by the following morning. The severity of nasal irritation appeared to be concentration dependent during the first half of the study, several rats in the highest dose group exhibited an urogenital discharge. This symptom was observed after exposure and was still apparent the following morning. Alopecia was observed in two rats of the highest dose group.

Body weights: no effects

Food consumption: no time or test material related differences were observed

Hematology:no effects

Blood chemistry: at 0.029 and 0.084 mg/l: SGOT values for males and females were significant elevated compared to control (II) at 0.0024 mg/l: SGOT values were comparable to control all other parameters appeared comparable to one or both control groups

Urinalysis: no effects

Gross pathology: No gross lesions interpreted as compound induced observed in any animal at necropsy

Organ weights:

Some variations in absolite and rel. weights, but the variations did not appear to be dose dependent and there were no compound related microscopic alterations associated with the involved tissue, therefore the biological signifcance of the variations could not be determined

Histopathology: 0.084 mg/l: brown pigments within sinusoidal macrophages in lymph nodes (6/20)was slightly increased when compared to controls (2 control I, 1 control II)concurrent erythrophagocytosis in the lymph nodes was also slightly increased in the Santocure NS treated group (4/20) as compared to controls (0 control T, 1 control II) Very slight to moderate focal to multifocal hepatocellular necrosis was observed in 3/20 animals; an associated acute inflammatory infiltrate was present in 2 of the 3 affected animals. This lesions was not present in controls While the previously described lesions may represent a compound effect, they have been observed in control rats at the facility and therefore the possibility that they are spontaneous in origin cannot be excluded. The ocurence and incidence of all other microscopic lesions were similar to that observed in controls. Histological examinations of treated animals (highest dose group) of the nasal turbinate area, trachea, lung and olfactory bulb revealed no biologically relevant differences compared to the controls.

Applicant's summary and conclusion