Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-802-0 | CAS number: 110-77-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-01-06 to 2010-01-19
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to the appropriate OECD guideline and in accordance with GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethylthioethanol
- IUPAC Name:
- Ethylthioethanol
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(ethylthio)ethanol
- EC Number:
- 203-802-0
- EC Name:
- 2-(ethylthio)ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 110-77-0
- Molecular formula:
- C4H10OS
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(ethylsulfanyl)ethan-1-ol
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/Ca
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan UK.
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 wk
- Weight at study initiation: 16.9-22.9 g
- Housing: 1/polycarbonate cage
- Diet: standard diet ad libitum
- Water: drinking water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-23
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): not stated
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2010-01-06 To: 2010-01-18
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 0, 25%, 50%, 100% TS
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: clear solution formed with 50% test substance in vehicle
- Irritation: no irritation reported in main study
- Lymph node proliferation response: tested on 1 animal using neat test substance.
MAIN STUDY
- Name of test method: LLNA (individual animal approach)
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: The test substance is regarded as a sensitizer if at least one concentration of the chemical results in a three-fold greater increase in 3HTdR incorporation compared to control values
25 ul applied daily to dorsal surface of both ears on 3 consecutive days.
Five days following the first topical application of test substance (Day 6) all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 μl of phosphate buffered saline containing 3H-methyl Thymidine1 (3HTdR: 80 μCi/mL) giving a nominal 20 μCi to each mouse.
Five hours following the administration of 3HTdR on Day 6 all mice were humanely killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and the draining auricular lymph nodes excised for each experimental animal. 1.0 mL of phosphate buffered saline was added to the lymph nodes for each animal. The animals were then discarded and no further investigations were carried out. The following procedures were carried out with the lymph nodes from these animals only.
A single cell suspension of lymph node cells (LNC) was prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation through a stainless steel gauze (200 mesh size). The LNC were then washed by adding 10 mL phosphate buffered saline, pelleted at 190 x g for 10 minutes and resuspended. The cells were washed twice again and resuspended in 3 mL trichloroacetic acid (TCA: 5%) following the final wash. After overnight incubation with 5% TCA at 4°C, the precipitate was recovered by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 mL 5% TCA and transferred to 10 mL Ultima gold scintillation fluid on Day 7. 3HTdR incorporation was measured by β-scintillation counting. The proliferative response of LNC was expressed as radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph node (dpm/node) and as the ratio of 3HTdR incorporation into LNC of test nodes relative to that recorded for control nodes (test/control ratio). - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- Analysis of variance was carried out on the data. If Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance was significant at the 1% level, the data were logarithmically transformed prior to analysis in order to stabilise the variances (Bartlett 1937). Comparisons were made between the control and Ethylthioethanol treated groups using Dunnett’s test (Dunnett 1955, 1964). To investigate the nature of the dose response curve the linear contrast was isolated.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- ratio (dmp/node) HCA (25%):control = 6
(Tested at this facility in October 2009 with the same strain of mouse.)
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: test/control ratio: 25% TS = 1.2 50% TS = 1.4 100% TS = 0.8
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: DPM/node: 0% TS = 337.60 25% TS = 389.95 50% TS = 468.80 100% TS = 262.60
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- A reliable local lymph node assay, conducted according to a standard method and GLP, failed to identify any sensitization potential in the test substance when applied at up to 100% to the ears of mice.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.