Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,3-bis(acetyloxy)propyl 8-(3-octyloxiran-2-yl)octanoate
Cas Number:
1487263-87-5
Molecular formula:
C25H44O7
IUPAC Name:
2,3-bis(acetyloxy)propyl 8-(3-octyloxiran-2-yl)octanoate
Test material form:
other: oily liquid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/CaOlaHsd
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
1% on three consecutive days

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: see Remark
Remarks:
None of the three tested concentrations of the test item reached the stimulation index of3. The stimulation index at a concentration of 25% was 0.8 The stimulation index at a concentration of 50% was 0.8 The stimulation index at a concentration of 100% was 1.3

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The EC3 value (derived by linear interpolation) could not be calculated as the stimulation indices of all concentrations were below 3.
The results of radioactivity determination were supported by the means of the ear thickness per group, which showed no relevant difference compared to the negative control.