Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Ecotoxicological Summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Hazard for aquatic organisms

Freshwater

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data: aquatic toxicity unlikely

Marine water

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data: aquatic toxicity unlikely

STP

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data: aquatic toxicity unlikely

Sediment (freshwater)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Sediment (marine water)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for air

Air

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for terrestrial organisms

Soil

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for predators

Secondary poisoning

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no potential for bioaccumulation

Additional information

Conclusion on classification

Reaction mass of 2,4-bis(xylylazo)resorcinol and 2,4-bis[(4-dodecylphenyl)azo]resorcinol and 2-[(4-dodecylphenyl)azo]-4-(2,4-xylylazo)resorcinol is highly insoluble and there is no expected toxicity at levels up to the water solubility. In addition, the substance is not readily biodegradable based on biodegradation estimates. Furthermore, the log Kow of this substance is ≥ 4. Taken together, this information indicates that Reaction mass of 2,4-bis(xylylazo)resorcinol and 2,4-bis[(4-dodecylphenyl)azo]resorcinol and 2-[(4-dodecylphenyl)azo]-4-(2,4-xylylazo)resorcinol should be classified as Aquatic Chronic 4 in accordance with the criteria stipulated under the Regulation 1272/2008 (CLP). However based on the available information from the primary constituents of the substance, the log kow for the substance was determined to be > 6.5. In accordance with the screening criteria for bioaccumulation in the ECHA Guidance (Chapter R.11 PBT Assessment) the substance would screen as a potential bioaccumulative substance. The likely reliability of the log Kow is however, considered to diminish above a value of 6, as noted in Appendix R.11-1 Annex 1 of ECHA guidance on PBT assessment. Substances with log Kow between 4.5 and 6 are considered likely to be highly accumulating; however no substantial bioconcentration is assumed having a log Kow value greater than 6. For compounds having a log Kow greater than 6, a gradual decrease of BCF is observed and it has been hypothesised within the published literature that a high log Kow is more an effect of solubility than a tendency of the substance to be lipophilic.This was coincided with the data from peer reviewed publications, articles and read across substances; where the BCF value was indicative of low bioaccumulation potential (BCF < 500).

 

On the basis of the available information the substance is not considered to be bioaccumulative. However, in the absence of further information, Aquatic Chronic 4 is applied on a worst case basis.