Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 402-860-6 | CAS number: 110553-27-0 CG 25-1320; IRGANOX 1520; TK 12229/1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 25 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Due to lack of repeated dose toxicity data by the inhalation route, a route to route extrapolation was performed. The NOAEL (oral) is converted into a NOAEC (corrected) in accordance to guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.8, ECHA, Nov 2012. The NOAEL (oral) has to be divided by a factor of 0.134 m³/kg body weight (respiratory volume of dogs during 8h) and corrected for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest (6.7 m³/10 m³). In addition, a default factor of 2 is applied to account for differences in oral and inhalative absorption properties. The corrected starting point is therefore:
NOAEC (corrected) = 10 mg/kg / 0.134 m³/kg x 0.5 x (6.7 m³/10m³) = 25 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is part of the route to route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- standard factor for remaining uncertainties
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- standard factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- GLP and guideline compliant study
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.29 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 35
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The dermal route is typically covered by oral route information in the absence of data for this administration route. Since no data on skin penetration is available a worst case approach was chosen and an absorption of 100% is assumed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1.4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from dog to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- standard factor for remaining uncertainties
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- standard factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- GLP and guideline compliant study
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Industrial exposure to the test article is considered to be low in general, as the substance is a viscous non volatile liquid. Since the test item did not show adverse effects in limit tests for acute systemic and local toxicity, no DNELs were derived for these endpoints. The most sensitive endpoint for long-term exposure is repeated dose toxicity. A 90-day study is available for rats and dogs, and the dog was found to be more sensitive. Both species showed responses of the liver. The DNEL is therefore derived from the NOEL of 10 mg/kg bw of the dog study. The NOAEL may be 100 mg/kg bw, but effects are borderline, so 10 mg/kg bw is used for calculation. A quality factor of 1 is assigned because all studies are GLP and OECD testing guideline compliant studies. The NOEL is lower than tested doses in the studies for reproductive toxicity and therefore adequate for these endpoints as well.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.25 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 12.5 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Because no inhalation study is available, a route to route extrapolation was performed. The NOAEL (oral) has to be modified into a NOAEC (corrected) in accordance to guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.8, ECHA, Nov 2012. Here, the NOAEL has to be divided by a factor of 0.4 m³/kg body weight (respiratory volume of dogs during 24h). In addition, a default factor of 2 is applied to account for differences in oral and inhalative absorption properties. The corrected starting point is therefore:
NOAEC (corrected) = 10 mg/kg / 0.4 m³/kg x 0.5 = 12.5 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is part of the route to route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- standard factor for remaining uncertainties
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- standard factor for the general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- GLP and guideline compliant study
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.14 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 70
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The dermal route is typically covered by oral route information in the absence of data for this administration route. Since no data on skin penetration is available a worst case approach was chosen and an absorption of 100% is assumed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1.4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from dog to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- standard factor for remaining uncertainties
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- standard factor for the general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- GLP-compliant guideline study
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.14 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 70
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1.4
- Justification:
- extrapolation from dog to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- standard factor for remaining uncertainties
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- standard factor for the general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- GLP-compliant guideline study
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Exposure to the test article is considered to be low in general, as it is embedded at a low percentage in articles and is nonvolatile. Since the test item did not show adverse effects in limit tests for acute systemic and local toxicity, no DNELs were derived for these endpoints. The most sensitive endpoint for long-term exposure is repeated dose toxicity. A 90-day study is available for rats and dogs, and the dog was found to be more sensitive. The DNEL is therefore derived from the NOEL of 10 mg/kg bw of the dog study. The NOAEL may be 100 mg/kg bw, but effects are borderline, so 10 mg/kg bw is used for calculation. A quality factor of 1 is assigned because all studies are GLP and OECD testing guideline compliant studies.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.