Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP compliant study that is suitable for classification and labelling

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD 439 and OECD 431
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl dodecanoate
EC Number:
700-503-1
Cas Number:
101238-01-1
Molecular formula:
C21 H41 N O2
IUPAC Name:
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl dodecanoate
Details on test material:
Purity: 96.4%

Test animals

Species:
human
Strain:
other: not applicable
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
EPIDERM(TM) 200 kit from MaTek Corp, Ashland MA, USA
reconstructed epidermis, surface 0.6cm2 and cultured in vessels of 1 cm diameter.

Test system

Type of coverage:
open
Preparation of test site:
other: not applicale
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated skin tissue
Amount / concentration applied:
30 μl applied to each tissue, spread to match tissue size.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
60 min
Observation period:
48h (recovery period, including 3h MTT incubation)
Number of animals:
not applicable
Details on study design:
To determine whether the test substance is able to reduce MTT directly, the test substance was incubated with the substrate.
Three tissues were treated with each test substance, positive and negative controls, espectively.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: viability of reconstituted epidermis (corrostion test)
Value:
97
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 60 min. Max. score: 100.0. Reversibility: other: not applicable. Remarks: Score given in %. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: viability of reconstituted epidermis (irritation test)
Value:
53
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 60 min. Max. score: 100.0. Reversibility: other: not applicable. Remarks: Score given in %. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Absorbance 570 nm (OD) (corrosion test)
Value:
1.847
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. Remarks: Negative Control: 1.909; Positive Control: 0.14. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Absorbance 570 nm (OD) (irritation test)
Value:
0.974
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. Remarks: Negative Control: 1.83; Positive Control 0.07. (migrated information)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Irritation experiment   Tissue 1 Tissue 2 Tissue 3 mean SD
Negative control OD570 nm 1.839 1.850 1.787 1.826  
viability [% of negative control] 100 7.83
             
test substance mean OD570 nm 0.952 0.979 0.99 0.974  
viability [% of negative control] 53 1.08
             
Positive control5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate OD570 nm 0.061 0.07 0.08 0.07  
viability [% of negative control] 4 0.51

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The substance causes effects in the vitro-skin irritation assay. These effects are below the threshold for classification as a skin irritant (GHS Category 1 or 2).