Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020-06-04 to 2020-09-01
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
August 24, 2009
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted March 23, 2006, corrected July 28, 2011
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
The samples were taken from the biological phase of the study. Duplicate samples from the freshly prepared test media (containing algae) of all test concentrations and from the control were taken at the start of the test. For the determination of the stability of the test item under the test conditions and of the maintenance of the test item concentrations during the test period, duplicate samples from the test media of all test concentrations and the control (containing algae) were taken at the end of the test (after the 72 hours test period) by pouring together the contents of the test beakers of each treatment. All samples remained untreated. All samples were stored in a freezer (≤ 20 °C), protected from light until analysis was performed.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
The test medium of the highest test concentration of nominal 100 mg test item/L was prepared by dissolving 94.5 mg test item into 945 mL test water by intense stirring for 105 minutes and ultrasonication for 15 minutes. Adequate volumes of this test medium were diluted with test water to prepare the test media of the other desired test concentrations. The test media were prepared just before introduction of the algae (= start of the test). The test item was slightly observable at the surface within the first 48 hours.
Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green algae
- Strain: 61.81 SAG
- Source: Collection of Agal Cultures, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
0.24 mmol/L (= 24 mg/L) as CaCO3
Test temperature:
20.8 - 22.2 °C
pH:
8.0 - 8.7 (in the control group);
7.8 - 8.7 (in the treatment group)
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal Conc.: 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 mg test item/L;
Measured conc.: mean of 94 % of nominal.
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Erlenmeyer flasks of 50 mL volume
- Type: closed
- Initial cells density: 5000 algal cells /mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: OECD medium

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity: 5133 lux (4480 to 5590 lux)

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Determination of cell concentrations: spectrophotometer

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2

RANGE FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 mg test item/L and a control.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
44.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
50 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
25 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
50 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Details on results:
The microscopic examination of the shape of the algal cells after 72 hours of test duration did not show any difference between the algae that had been growing up to a nominal test concentration of 100 mg test item/L and the algal cells in the control. Thus, the shape of the algal cells was not obviously affected up to this test concentration, the highest concentration tested.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? Yes
For the evaluation of the reliability of the test system and the experimental conditions Potassium dichromate is tested at least twice a year. The last study with the reference item Potassium dichromate was performed in January 2020 and the following results were obtained:
The 72h ErC50: 0.858 mg/L, (95 % confidence limits: 0.811 - 0.919 mg/L)
The 72h EyC50: 0.470 mg/L, (95 % confidence limits: 0.450 - 0.488 mg/L)

Biological Results:


Validity Criteria: 150.5-fold increase of cell density within 72 hours; CV of sectional (daily) growth rate of control: 26.5%; CV of average growth of control replicates: 1.0 %; and thus, the validity criteria were met.The 72h ErC50: 0.858 mg/L, (95 % confidence limits: 0.811 - 0.919 mg/L)


The 72h EyC50: 0.470 mg/L, (95 % confidence limits: 0.450 - 0.488 mg/L)


Table 1: Biological Results


 



















































Parameter



Yield [mg test item/L]



Growth rate [mg test item/L]



72-hour EC50



> 100



>100



95 % conf. interval



n.d.



n.d.



72-hour EC20



> 100



>100



95 % conf. interval



n.d.



n.d.



72-hour EC10



44.3



>100



95 % conf. interval



n.d.



n.d.



72-hour NOEC



25



50



72-hour LOEC



50



100



n.d. = not determinable


Values refer to nominal test concentration


 


Table 2: Summary of Analytical Results


 
















































Sample Description [mg test item/L]



% of nominal1



RSD [%]



n



Control



n.a.



n.a.



4



6.25



109



2



2



12.5



85



19



4



25



93



10



4



50



94



5



4



100



98



3



4



1 mean value of all measured samples per treatment group


RSD: relative standard deviation per treatment group


n: number of analysed samples; n.a.: not applicable


Italic: this concentrations are below NOEC (=25 mg test item/L)


 


Table 3: Algal Cell Densities during the Test Period of 72 Hours























































































































































































































































Nominal concentration [mg test item/L]



Flask No.



Density of algal cells [10000/mL] after



24 hours



48 hours



72 hours



Control



1



1.866



15.082



76.430



 



2



1.658



14.254



76.650



 



3



1.658



15.496



75.110



 



4



2.074



15.496



77.971



 



5



1.866



16.117



77.530



 



6



1.658



15.496



67.849



 



m



1.797



15.323



75.257



 



s



0.170



0.620



3.762



6.25



1



2.282



15.910



77.310



 



2



2.282



14.668



70.709



 



3



2.282



15.496



71.809



 



m



2.282



15.358



73.276



 



s



0.000



0.632



3.537



12.5



1



2.490



15.703



83.912



 



2



2.490



14.461



73.790



 



3



2.282



15.496



74.010



 



m



2.420



15.220



77.237



 



s



0.120



0.665



5.781



25



1



2.282



14.254



70.489



 



2



2.074



13.219



71.149



 



3



2.074



14.047



65.648



 



m



2.143



13.840



69.096



 



s



0.120



0.548



3.004



50



1



1.866



12.805



65.428



 



2



2.074



12.184



57.947



 



3



2.074



13.840



74.670



 



m



2.005



12.943



66.015



 



s



0.120



0.837



8.377



100



1



2.074



13.840



64.548



 



2



2.282



16.738



75.330



 



3



2.074



12.184



52.886



 



m



2.143



14.254



64.255



 



s



0.120



2.305



11.225



m: mean value; s: standard deviation


At test start nominal 5000 algal cells/mL were inoculated


 


Table 4: Yield during the Test Period of 72 Hours























































































































































































































































Nominal concentration [mg test item/L]



Flask No.



Yield y [10000 cells/mL] after



24 hours



48 hours



72 hours



Control



1



1.366



14.582



75.930



 



2



1.158



13.754



76.150



 



3



1.158



14.996



74.610



 



4



1.574



14.996



77.471



 



5



1.366



15.617



77.030



 



6



1.158



14.996



67.349



 



m



1.297



14.823



74.757



 



s



0.170



0.620



3.762



6.25



1



1.782



15.410



76.810



 



2



1.782



14.168



70.209



 



3



1.782



14.996



71.309



 



m



1.782



14.858



72.776



 



s



0.000



0.632



3.537



12.5



1



1.990



15.203



83.412



 



2



1.990



13.961



73.290



 



3



1.782



14.996



73.510



 



m



1.920



14.720



76.737



 



s



0.120



0.665



5.781



25



1



1.782



13.754



69.989



 



2



1.574



12.719



70.649



 



3



1.574



13.547



65.148



 



m



1.643



13.340



68.596



 



s



0.120



0.548



3.004



50



1



1.366



12.305



64.928



 



2



1.574



11.684



57.447



 



3



1.574



13.340



74.170



 



m



1.505



12.443



65.515



 



s



0.120



0.837



8.377



100



1



1.574



13.340



64.048



 



2



1.782



16.238



74.830



 



3



1.574



11.684



52.386



 



m



1.643



13.754



63.755



 



s



0.120



2.305



11.225



 


m: mean value; s; standard deviation


 


Table 5: Growth rate during the Test Period of 72 Hours


 























































































































































































































































Nominal concentration


[mg test item/L]



Flask No.



Growth rates u [1/day] after



0 - 24 hours



0 - 48 hours



0 - 72 hours



Control



1



1.317



1.703



1.677



 



2



1.199



1.675



1.677



 



3



1.199



1.717



1.671



 



4



1.423



1.717



1.683



 



5



1.317



1.737



1.681



 



6



1.199



1.717



1.637



 



m



1.276



1.711



1.671



 



s



0.092



0.021



0.017



6.25



1



1.518



1.730



1.680



 



2



1.518



1.689



1.651



 



3



1.518



1.717



1.656



 



m



1.518



1.712



1.662



 



s



0.000



0.021



0.016



12.5



1



1.605



1.723



1.708



 



2



1.605



1.682



1.665



 



3



1.518



1.717



1.666



 



m



1.576



1.708



1.679



 



s



0.050



0.022



0.024



25



1



1.518



1.675



1.650



 



2



1.423



1.637



1.653



 



3



1.423



1.668



1.626



 



m



1.454



1.660



1.643



 



s



0.055



0.020



0.015



50



1



1.317



1.621



1.625



 



2



1.423



1.597



1.584



 



3



1.423



1.660



1.669



 



m



1.387



1.626



1.626



 



s



0.061



0.032



0.042



100



1



1.423



1.660



1.620



 



2



1.518



1.755



1.672



 



3



1.423



1.597



1.554



 



m



1.454



1.671



1.615



 



s



0.055



0.080



0.059



m: mean value; s: standard deviation


 


Table 6: Yield y and Percentage Inhibition of y during the Test Period


 


 













































































Nominal concentration


[mg test item/L]



Yields y [10000cells/mL] and % inhibition of y



0- 24 hours



0 - 4 8 hours



0 - 72 hours



Y



%



y



%



y



%



Control



1.297



-



14.823



-



74.757



-



6.25



1.782



-37.4



14.858



-0.2



72.776



2.6



12.5



1.920



-48.1



14.720



0.7



76.737



-2.6



25



1.643



-26.7



13.340



10.0



* 68.596



8.2



50



1.505



-16.0



12.443



16.1



* 65.515



12.4 *



100



1.643



-26.7



13.754



7.2



* 63.755



14.7 *



 


negative values in '% inhibition' indicate an increase in growth relative to that of the control


* mean value significantly different from the control (tested with Dunnett's t-test (24h) and Williams t-test (48 and 72h), a = 0.05, one-sided smaller


 


Table 7: Growth Rates u. and Percentage Inhibition of u. during the Test Period


 
















































































 



Growth rates p. [1/day] and % inhibition of µ



Nominal concentration



0-24 hours



0 - 4 8 hours



0-



72 hours



[mgtest item/L]



u



%



1



%



M-



%



Control



1.276



-



1.711



-



1.671



-



6.25



1.518



-19.0



1.712



-0.1



1.662



0.5



12.5



1.576



-23.6



1.708



0.2



1.679



-0.5



25



1.454



-14.0



1.660



3.0



1.643



1.7



50



1.387



-8.8



1.626



5.0



* 1.626



2.7



100



1.454



-14.0



1.671



2.3



1.615



3.3 *



 


negative values in '% inhibition' indicate an increase in growth relative to that of the control


* mean value significantly different from the control (tested with Dunnett's t-test, a = 0.05, one-sided smaller)


Table 8: Signs of Phytotoxicity evaluated by microscopic observations


 








































Nominal concentration



Microscopic observations of algal cells



[mg test item/L]



0 hours



72 hours



6.25



0



0



12.5



0



0



25



0



0



50



0



0



100



0



0



0: no effects


 


Table 9: Results for the Determination of the Test Item in the Test Samples


 


 


 























































































































































































































































































































































Sample Description


[mg test item/L]



Sampling Age



Concentration found



 



Concentration calculated


[mgtest item/L]1



Concentration nominal


[mgtest item/L]1



% of


nominal1



day



[h]



[mg test item/L]1



D.F.



Control



0



0



<LOD



2



n.a.



0.000



n.a.



Control



0



0



<LOD



2



n.a.



0.000



n.a.



Control



3



72



<LOD



2



n.a.



0.000



n.a.



Control



3



72



<LOD



2



n.a.



0.000



n.a.



6.25



0



0



3.468



2



6.936



6.250



111



6.25



0



0



3.350



2



6.700



6.250



107



6.25



3



72



1.900



2



3.800



6.250



<LOQ



6.25



3



72



1.895



2



3.791



6.250



<LOQ



 



 



 



 



 



 



mean value (n=2):



109



RSD (n=2):



2



12.5



0



0



6.170



2



12.340



12.500



99



12.5



0



0



6.202



2



12.404



12.500



99



12.5



3



72



4.580



2



9.160



12.500



73



12.5



3



72



4.340



2



8.680



12.500



69



 



 



 



 



 



 



mean value (n=4):



85



RSD (n=4):



19



25



0



0



12.486



2



24.973



25.000



100



25



0



0



12.639



2



25.278



25.000



101



25



3



72



10.430



2



20.860



25.000



83



25



3



72



10.761



2



21.523



25.000



86



 



 



 



 



 



 



mean value (n=4):



93



RSD (n=4):



10



50



0



0



24.648



2



49.295



50.000



99



50



0



0



24.433



2



48.866



50.000



98



50



3



72



22.429



2



44.858



50.000



90



50



3



72



22.515



2



45.031



50.000



90



 



 



 



 



 



 



mean value (n=4):



94



RSD (n=4):



5



100



0



0



49.883



2



99.765



100.000



100



100



0



0



50.632



2



101.264



100.000



101



100



3



72



48.089



2



96.179



100.000



96



100



3



72



48.281



2



96.562



100.000



97



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



mean value (n=4):



98



RSD (n=4):



3



overall mean value (n=18):



94



RSD (n=18):



11



1The tabulated results represent rounded results calculated on the exact raw data


LOD: Limit of Detection = 0.8 mg test item/L


LOQ: Limit of Quantification = 5 mg test item/L


Italic: this concentrations are below NOEC (=25 mg test item/L)


n.a.: not applicable; RSD: Relative Standard Deviation; D.F.: Dilution factor

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The effect of the test item on algal growth was assessed using the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata according to OECD TG 201 showed the following results: The 72-hour EyC50 was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC50 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour EyC10 was calculated to be 44.3 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC10 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOEyC was determined to be 25 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOEyC was 50 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOErC was determined to be 50 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOErC was 100 mg test item/L. No abnormal appearance of the algal cells was observed during the experiment.
Executive summary:

The acute toxicity of the test item was investigated in a GLP-study according to OECD test guideline 201 using unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. For this purpose, exponentially growing cultures of this unicellular green algal species were exposed to various concentrations (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 mg test item/L (spacing factor 2)) of the test item under defined conditions. The inhibition of growth in relation to control cultures was determined over a test period of 72 hours, and thus over several algal generations. The test method and the test species Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata are recommended by the OECD guideline. The purpose of the analytical part of this study was to verify the concentrations of the test item in the test medium. This study encompassed 6 treatment groups (5 dose rates of the test item and a control) with three replicates per test concentration and six replicates for the control. At test start 50 mL of the test media were inoculated with nominal 5000 algal cells per mL test medium and defined volumes of the algal suspensions were sampled after 24, 48 and 72 for determination of cell densities by spectrophotometric measurement. The quantification of the test item in the test samples was performed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV. The initial concentrations and the maintenance of the exposure concentrations during the test were verified in the analytical part. The recoveries at the test start in case of all concentrations are above 80% and this confirmed that the test item was dosed correctly. During the test, the algae were exposed to a mean concentration of 94 % of the nominal concentration. All reported results refer to nominal values. Thus, the effect of the test item on freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata according to OECD TG 201 showed the following results: The 72-hour EyC50 was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC50 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour EyC10 was calculated to be 44.3 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC10 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOEyC was determined to be 25 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOEyC was 50 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOErC was determined to be 50 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOErC was 100 mg test item/L. No abnormal appearance of the algal cells was observed during the experiment.

Description of key information

The effect of the test item on algal growth was assessed using the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata according to OECD TG 201 showed the following results: The 72-hour EyC50 was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC50 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour EyC10 was calculated to be 44.3 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC10 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOEyC was determined to be 25 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOEyC was 50 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOErC was determined to be 50 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOErC was 100 mg test item/L. No abnormal appearance of the algal cells was observed during the experiment (reference 6.1.5 -1).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The acute toxicity of the test item was investigated in a GLP-study according to OECD test guideline 201 using unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. For this purpose, exponentially growing cultures of this unicellular green algal species were exposed to various concentrations (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 mg test item/L (spacing factor 2)) of the test item under defined conditions. The inhibition of growth in relation to control cultures was determined over a test period of 72 hours, and thus over several algal generations. The test method and the test species Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata are recommended by the OECD guideline. The purpose of the analytical part of this study was to verify the concentrations of the test item in the test medium. This study encompassed 6 treatment groups (5 dose rates of the test item and a control) with three replicates per test concentration and six replicates for the control. At test start 50 mL of the test media were inoculated with nominal 5000 algal cells per mL test medium and defined volumes of the algal suspensions were sampled after 24, 48 and 72 for determination of cell densities by spectrophotometric measurement. The quantification of the test item in the test samples was performed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV. The initial concentrations and the maintenance of the exposure concentrations during the test were verified in the analytical part. The recoveries at the test start in case of all concentrations are above 80% and this confirmed that the test item was dosed correctly. During the test, the algae were exposed to a mean concentration of 94 % of the nominal concentration. All reported results refer to nominal values. Thus, the effect of the test item on freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata according to OECD TG 201 showed the following results: The 72-hour EyC50 was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC50 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour EyC10 was calculated to be 44.3 mg test item/L and the 72-hour ErC10 value was calculated to be > 100 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOEyC was determined to be 25 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOEyC was 50 mg test item/L. The 72-hour NOErC was determined to be 50 mg test item/L and the associated 72-hour LOErC was 100 mg test item/L. No abnormal appearance of the algal cells was observed during the experiment.