Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 951-458-1 | CAS number: -
Environmental fate & pathways
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Currently viewing:
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(CCC(=C)CCN(C)c2ccccc2)(COC(=O)CCN(C)c1ccccc1)COC(=O)C=C
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(COC(=O)CCN(C)c1ccccc1)(COC(=O)CCN(C)c2ccccc2)COC(=O)CCN(C)c3ccccc3
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(CO)(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(COC(=O)CCOC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)(COC(=O)C=C)COC(=O)C=C
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(COCC(CC)(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)(COC(=O)CCOC(=O)C=C)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(COC(=O)CCOC(=O)C=C)(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(COCC(CC)(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)(COC(=O)CCOC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCC(CO)(COC(=O)CCN(C)C1=CC=CC=C1)COC(=O)C=C
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- June 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite 2012
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BIOWIN v4.10 (September 2010)
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CNC1=CC=CC=C1
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached justification
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached justification
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached justification - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BIOWIN v. 4.10
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was predicted to be not readily biodegradable
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
Results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- not biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
