Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Not GLP study, aged study Read across from a similar substance which has the same main component and with a different counter ion that doesn't influence the characteristics related to the specific end-point
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Toxicological studies on malachite green: A triphenylmethane dye
Author:
Clemmensen S., Jensen C., Jensen N., Meyer O., Olsen P., Wurtzen G.
Year:
1984
Bibliographic source:
Arch Toxico l1984) 56: 43-45

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
For skin application a site of 35 cm^2 was clipped 3 h before administration and the site covered by four-ply gauze and an elastic bandage.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Similar substance 03
IUPAC Name:
Similar substance 03

Test animals

Species:
other: rat and guinea pig
Strain:
other: Wistar and Ssc
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALSRATS- Strain: Wistar rats, Mol: WIST (SPF) - Weight at study initiation: 170-250 g- Source: from Molllegard Breeding Centre (L1. Skensved, Denmark)GUINEA PIG- Strain: Ssc, AL- Source: Statens Serumininstitut, (Copenhagen, Denmark)- Weight at study initiation: 300 gAll were given food and water freely except 16 h before gavage. For rats - Temperature: kept at 22 ± 1°C- Humidity: 60 ± 10% - Light: from 21.00 to 09.00 with air changes eight times/h.

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST MATERIAL- Amount(s) applied: Aqueous solution - Concentration: MGH at 20%
Duration of exposure:
14 days
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Groups of five animals of either sex
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
For skin application a site of 35 cm^2 was clipped 3 h before administration and the site covered by four-ply gauze and an elastic bandage (Acrylastic, Beiersdorf AG, FRG)Observation period: 1, 2, 3, and 5 h after dosing and each day for 14 days

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD0
Effect level:
ca. 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.

Any other information on results incl. tables

No signs of systemic toxicity were observed after occlusive dermal application of 2000 mg/kg. As a 20% suspension of similar substance did not produce visible erythema or oedema on either rats or guinea pigs; authors hadn't deemed it meaningful doing a rabbit skin irritation study. Similarly, within the conditions of the guinea pig maximisation test no effects could be seen on controls or treated animals.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP: not classified
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Acute Dermal Toxicity: no signs of systemic toxicity were observed after occlusive dermal application of 2000 mg/kg
Executive summary:

Rats ang guinea pig were tested for dermal acute toxicity. For skin application a site of 35 cm^2 was clipped 3 h before administration and the site covered by four-ply gauze and an elastic bandage.

No signs of systemic toxicity were observed after occlusive dermal application of 2000 mg/kg. As a 20% suspension did not produce visible erythema or oedema on either rats or guinea pigs; authors hadn't deemed it meaningful doing a rabbit skin irritation study. Similarly, within the conditions of the guinea pig maximisation test no effects could be seen on controls or treated animals.