Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1991
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: public available literature (non GLP, no guideline)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Genotoxicity of hexamethylenetetraamine.
Author:
Girmanova, I., Chalupa, I., Sekerka, V.
Year:
1991
Bibliographic source:
Biologia (Bratislava), 46, 11, 1009-1015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Sister chromatid exchange was measured additionally
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methenamine
EC Number:
202-905-8
EC Name:
Methenamine
Cas Number:
100-97-0
Molecular formula:
C6H12N4
IUPAC Name:
1,3,5,7-tetraazatricyclo[3.3.1.1³,⁷]decane
Test material form:
solid: crystalline

Method

Target gene:
not applicable, chromosome aberration test
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0.1, 1, 10, 50 mmol/L
Vehicle / solvent:
water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
incubation time: 20 h (Chromosome aberration), 30 h (Sister chromatid exchanges)
Evaluation criteria:
100 metaphases from two replicates were evaluated.
Statistics:
Student t-test

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
strong cytotoxic effect at a concentration of 50 mmol/L
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Chromosome aberrations:
In the highest analysable concentration of 10 mmol/l 7% aberrant cells (without gaps) were induced compared to 2% in control cultures. Higher doses were strongly cytotoxic.
Sister chromatid exchanges:
Slightly increased SCE frequencies were described after treatment of V79 cells with 10 and 50 mmol/l methenamine.
Historical control data and other critical parameters at high concentrations (osmolarity, pH) not reported.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Methenamine induced chromosome aberrations in the highest analysable concentration of 10 mmol/L. Slightly increased Sister Chromatid Exchange frequencies were also described after treatment of V79 cells with 10 and 50 mmol/L methenamine.
Executive summary:

In a mammalian cell cytogenetics assay (Chromosome aberration (CA) and Sister Chromatid Exchanges (SCE)), V79 cell cultures were exposed to methenamine in water at concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 50 mmol/L without metabolic activation.

Methenamine was tested up to cytotoxic concentration. In the highest analysable concentration of 10 mmol/l 7% aberrant cells (without gaps) were induced compared to 2% in control cultures. Higher doses were strongly cytotoxic. Only one experiment without S-9 mix was done. In the same publication slightly increased SCE frequencies were described after treatment of V79 cells with 10 and 50 mmol/l methenamine. Positive controls induced the appropriate response. There was a concentration related positive response of Chromosome aberration and SCE induced over background.

This study is classified as acceptable but due to missing data about cytotoxicity a final evaluation is difficult. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline (OECD 473, EU B.10 and in vitro sister chromatid exchange assay in V79 cells) for in vitro cytogenetic mutagenicity data.