Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

- Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion:
In vivo skin irritation test (OECD 404): not irritating.
- Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion:
In vivo eye irritation test (OECD 405): not irritating.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18 April 1988 - 22 April 1988
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Perfomed under GLP, reliability score 2 because of missing substance identity information
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Rosemead Rabbits, Rosemead, Waltham Abbey, Essex, England
- Age at study initiation: approx. 3 months
- Weight at study initiation:
Study report 0392: 2.58-2.87 kg
Study report 0393: 2.78-3.00 kg
Study report 0394: 2.60-3.17 kg
Study report 0395: 2.54-3.14 kg
Study report 0396: 2.98-3.07 kg
- Housing: Individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum, standard pelleted rabbit diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum, tap water
- Acclimation period: At least 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 (15-23)
- Humidity (%): 55 (40-70)
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Other flank of animal
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
3 days (1 hour, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of dressing)
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Dorsum, moistened with 0.2 ml of water before application
- % coverage: No data (3x2 cm)
- Type of wrap if used: Unmedicated gauze patch, held in place by strips of Blenderm

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Where necessary, the treatment sites were gently washed with warm water and dried with paper towels to remove excessive amounts of test material adhering to the skin
- Time after start of exposure: Diretly after removal of dressing

SCORING SYSTEM:
Erythema and eschar formation:
0 - No erythema
1 - Very slight erythema (barely perceptible)
2 - Well-defined erythema
3 - Moderate to severe erythema
4 - Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injury in depth)

Oedema formation:
0 - No oedema
1 - Very slight oedema (barely perceptible)
2 - Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising)
3 - Moderate oedema (raised approx. 1 mm)
4 - Severe oedema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond the area of exposure)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0392
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0392
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0393
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0393
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0394
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0394
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0395
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0395
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0396
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: Study report 0396
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Grey discolouration of test sites of animals was observed in 4/5 studies, but this was not considered to be caused by an irritating potential of activated carbon. In most individual cases this effect was reversible within 72 hours. All control sites failed to show any response to the control procedure.
Other effects:
Not relevant

Study report Endpoint Irritation scores at timepoints of evaluation
1 24 48 72
0392 Erythema 0 0 0 0
Oedema 0 0 0 0
0393 Erythema 0* 0* 0* 0*
Oedema 0 0 0 0
0394 Erythema 0* 0* 0 0
Oedema 0 0 0 0
0395 Erythema 0* 0* 0* 0
Oedema 0 0 0 0
0396 Erythema 0* 0* 0* 0*
Oedema 0 0 0 0
*Grey discolouration 
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The studies assessed the irritating potential of activated carbon in rabbits (OECD 404 test). No erythema or oedema effects were observed, indicating that activated carbon can be considered as a non-irritant to skin under the conditions of the tests. This was based on the criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC .
Executive summary:

The skin irritating potential of activated carbon was assessed in multiple studies (5 samples of activated carbon) in rabbits (OECD 404). Animals were exposed for 4 hours and observed thereafter for 72 hours (at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of test substance). Three rabbits were used per study, every animal was its own control (other flank of the animal).

The studies showed no erythema or oedema effects after the application of activated carbon within 72 hours. In 4/5 studies grey discolouration of the treated skin was seen. In most individual cases this effect was reversible within 72 hours.

Therefore, the test substance does not need to be classified as skin irritant according to the the EU criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
30 April 2010 - 09 May 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Performed under GLP
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
2002
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
Statement of Compliance
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories B.V., Kreuzelweg 53, 5961 NM Horst / The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 16 - 18 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2420 – 2584 g
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls
- Diet: Pelleted standard Kliba Nafag 3418 rodent maintenance diet available ad libitum
- Water: Community tap water from Füllinsdorf ad libitum
- Acclimation period:5-6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

IN-LIFE DATES: No data
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g/animal
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted (100%)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48, and 72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: The eye reactions were assessed according to the numerical scoring system listed in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, B.5, at approximately 1, 24, 48, 72 hours after administration. Scleral reddening and ocular discharge were also assessed.

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Varta Cliptrix diagnostic-lamp (Roth AG, 4153 Reinach / Switzerland)
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal # 1,2 and 3
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal # 1, 2 and 3
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
Redness
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal # 1, 2 and 3
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
ca. 0.67
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal # 1
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
ca. 0.33
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal # 2
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal # 3
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
ca. 0.33
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The instillation of Steam Activated Carbon into the eye resulted in mild, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, chemosis of the conjunctivae and ocular discharge. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 72 hours after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals. No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea or for the iris light reflex of any animals at any of the examinations. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. No clinical signs were observed.
Other effects:
No intercurrent deaths occurred during the course of the study. The body weight of the animals was within the range commonly recorded for this strain and age. Black test item remnants were observed in the treated eyes of all animals at the 1-hour reading (in one animal) or from the 1-hour to the 48-hour reading (2 animals).
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye. Based on these results and according to the EU criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP/EU-GHS), Steam Activated Carbon does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement with respect to eye irritation in rabbits.
Executive summary:

The primary eye irritation potential of Steam Activated Carbon was investigated according to OECD test guideline no. 405. The test item was applied by instillation of 0.1 g into the left eye of each of 3 young adult New Zealand White rabbits. Scoring of irritation effects was performed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test item instillation. The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation) for each animal for corneal opacity, iris, redness and chemosis of the conjunctivae, separately. The individual mean scores for corneal opacity and iris light reflex were 0.00 for all three animals. The individual mean scores for the conjunctivae were 0.67, 0.67 and 0.67 for reddening and 0.33, 0.00 and 0.33 for chemosis. The instillation of Steam Activated Carbon into the eye resulted in mild, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, chemosis of the conjunctivae and ocular discharge. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 72 hours after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals. No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea or for the iris light reflex of any animals at any of the examinations. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. No staining of the treated eyes by the test item was observed and no clinical signs were observed. Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye. Based on these results and according to the EU criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP/EU-GHS), Steam Activated Carbon does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement with respect to eye irritation in rabbits.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The multiple studies for assessing the skin irritating potential showed no erythema or oedema effects after the application of Activated Carbon - High Density Skeleton (AC-HDS) within 72 hours. In 4/5 studies grey discolouration of the treated skin was seen. In most individual cases this effect was reversible within 72 hours. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-irritant.

In the key in vivo study available for eye irritation AC-HDS did not induce any significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye. It is concluded that the test substance is a non irritant.

The respiratory irritation was not studied for AC-HDS.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Both key in vivo studies indicate that Activated Carbon - High Density Skeleton does not induce any significant irritation to the skin and eye. Therefore, it can be concluded that the substance is not irritating and therefore does not need to be classified as such according to the criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP/EU-GHS) .