Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-497-6 | CAS number: 959-26-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- accepted calculation method
- Justification for type of information:
- The basis for this read-across approach is that the target substance is expected to undergo transformation into terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1). The toxicity of the metabolites will accurately predict the toxicity of the bis(2-hydroxyethyl)terephthalate (BHET; 959-26-2; 213-497-6). Refer to the JUSTIFICATION FOR READ-ACROSS OF TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION in Section 13 of this dossier for further details.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test material was supplied by the Amoco Corporation.
Purity was not noted but typically exceeds 99% - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Female rats weight 117-150 g
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- Exposures were by whole body inhalation conducted in 2 m³ chambers with an airflow rate of 305-420 L/min. Test article was ground to respirable-sized particles using a Retsch Ultra-Centrifugal Mill. Chambers were sampled 2x/exposure period and TPA levels were determined by spectrophotometric analysis. Particle size was determined using a cascade impactor.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on mating procedure:
- Female rats weight 117-150 g were quarantined and housed 2/cage with 1 male.
Confirmation of mating was via evidence of sperm in a vaginal smear (Day 0). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- days 6-15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 6 hours/day for 10 consecutive days
- Duration of test:
- 20 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 0.90 mg/m³ (Time-weighted average)
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 4.73 mg/m³ (Time-weighted average)
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 mg/L air (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 10.4 mg/m³ (Time-weighted average)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 26-27 timed-pregnant dams per dose level
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- Confirmation of mating was via evidence of sperm in a vaginal smear (Day 0), after which females were housed singly. The study consisted of 26-27 timed-pregnant dams per dose level.
Temperature, humidity and airflow were measured hourly. Animals were observed twice daily and given detailed physical exams daily on days 0 and 6-20. Dams were weighed on Days 0, 5 (randomization into groups), 6 (exposure initiation), 11, 16, and 20 (study termination). Standard “guideline” post-mortem procedures were carried out on the females and their fetuses. - Statistics:
- Data were analyzed in an appropriate statistical manner using log transformations, multivariate ANOVA, single factor ANOVA and Dunnett’s-“t”-test depending on the nature and type of end-point assessed. The dam was considered to be a random factor and the pup a nested factor within the dam.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No statistically significant differences in uterine weight
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other:
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No statistically significant differences were noted in mean litter weights.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No statistically significant differences were noted in pup viability
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- External soft tissue examinations did not indicate any differences from control
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Internal examinations showed a slight increase in the incidence of rib anomalies in the middle dose (5.0 mg/m³) group. This was only significant when all the various types of rib anomalies were added together.
Rib anomalies were not deemed to be an indicator of teratogenesis because they were common variations, were not elevated in a dose-related manner, and occurred at a rate that was within the range of laboratories own historical controls. Furthermore, no other signs of embryotoxicity were associated with this change. - Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No statistically significant differences were noted at any dose group.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- No evidence of maternal or developmental toxicity was seen in an inhalation study with rats exposed to terephthalic acid at levels of up to 10.4 mg/m³.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Guideline:
- other: Assessing the potential of ethylene glycol, when administered by gavage during major organogenesis, to cause maternal and developmental toxicity in rabbits, a common non-rodent test animal species.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight: The range of actual body weights for females on GD 0 was 2470 to 4460 g
- Housing: Inseminated females were individually housed in stainless steel cages with mesh flooring
- Diet: Certified rabbit chow, ad libitum
- Water: filtered water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19.6 °C
- Humidity (%): 54.1% (range of 26.8 to 81.9%)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Animal room lights were on from 7 to 19 hr for females and from 7 to 21 hr for males - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- Artificially inseminated New Zealand white does were dosed daily with EG in vehicle or with the deionized/distilled water vehicle on the mornings of GD 6-19. Treatment was by gavage using a stainless steel dosing tube. A dose volume of 5 mL/kg body wt was used for all groups. The volume administered was adjusted according to daily body weights. All formulations were 93 -107% of theoretical for predosing analyses/for the postdosing analyses. All formulations were 91.6-109% of the predosing measured concentrations.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on mating procedure:
- To induce ovulation, females received an intravenous injection of Pregnyl (0. 1 ml/kg) immediately prior to insemination. The day of insemination was designated as Gestational Day (GD) 0. Females were assigned to dose groups (23 -24 per group) by stratified randomization on GD 0 so that body weights did not differ among groups within any individual replicate. The study was performed in two replicates (11-12 inseminated females per dose per replicate) with two consecutive breeding days in each replicate. The last breeding date for the first replicate and the first breeding date for the second replicate were 5 weeks apart.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- gestation day 6 to 19
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- until gestation day 30
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 23 - 24
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- The doses chosen were based on preliminary studies with nonpregnant rabbits and information from rodents which indicated developmental effects at much lower doses than maternal effects. Analyses of the dosing formulations indicated that they were homogeneous and stable for at least 3 weeks.
- Maternal examinations:
- Inseminated females were weighed on GD 0, 6-19, 25, and 30. Females were observed and maternal water consumption was measured daily throughout gestation GD 0-30. All surviving inseminated females were killed at scheduled necropsy on GD 30 by iv injection of a euthanasia solution into the marginal ear vein. The maternal liver, kidneys and intact uterus were weighed and corpora lutea counted. Uteri which presented no visible implantation sites were stained with ammonium sulfide (10%) to detect very early resorptions. Maternal kidneys were bisected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Kidneys from 10 randomly selected does from the control through the 1000 mg/kg/day EG groups and all the kidneys from the 2000 mg/kg/day EG group as well as kidneys from all does which died during study were sectioned, stained with hematoxylin/eosin and evaluated histologically. The sections were also examined under polarized light for oxalate crystals.
- Fetal examinations:
- Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and euthanized. They were weighed, examined for external morphological abnormalities including cleft palate and dissected for visceral examination and determination of sex by a fresh tissue dissection technique. Half of the fetuses were decapitated after dissection: the heads were fixed in Bouin's solution and then examined by a freehand sectioning technique. All fetal carcasses were skinned, cleared, stained with Alcian blue/alizarin red S. and examined for skeletal malformations and variations.
- Statistics:
- Analyses were performed using the doe or the litter as the experimental unit. General Linear Trend Models procedures were applied for the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of maternal and fetal parameters. Prior to GLM analysis, an arcsine-square root transformation was performed on all litter-derived percentage data and Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance was performed on all data to be analysed by ANOVA.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No clear treatment-related clinical signs of toxicity were observed.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Maternal toxicity was observed at 2000 mg/kg/day, expressed as 42.1% mortality (8 of 17 pregnant animals). The 8 does which died at 2000 mg/kg/day died on GD 9 (one doe) and 11 (two does) and on GD 13, 14, 19, 21 and 25 (one doe each).
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Periodic maternal body weights and weight changes were statistically equivalent across all groups for all intervals evaluated.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Maternal water consumption, expressed as g/animal/day or as g/kg/day was also statistically equivalent across all groups for all intervals, although water consumption appeared slightly increased for all EG-dosed groups during the treatment period but not in a manner related to dose.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At scheduled necropsy on GD 30 there were no significant effects of treatment on corrected (for uterine weight) maternal gestational weight change, gravid uterine weight, liver weight, or kidney weight at any dose. However, maternal absolute kidney weight (but not relative weight) was slightly increased at 2000 mg/kg/day to 106.3% of the control value for the right kidney (left kidney value was 107.6% of control).
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histologic evaluation of maternal kidneys revealed treatment-related renal lesions only at 2000 mg/kg/day. The lesions were limited to the cortical renal tubules and included intraluminal crystals (appearance consistent with oxalate), epithelial necrosis, and tubular dilatation and degeneration. The most severe findings, crystals (designated "marked") and necrosis, were observed in the does which died on study, but the renal tubular necrosis observed in these animals was not a postmortem event. The cause of death in these animals was determined to be renal failure.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Number of abortions:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- An increase in early deliveries with three does at 2000 mg/kg bw (and one each at all other doses) was observed. One dose at 2000 mg/kg/day aborted on GD 20 (no litters were aborted at any other doses). Increases in early deliveries and abortion are usually considered indicative of maternal stress in rabbits.
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment-related effects on any gestational parameters, including no effects on number of ovarian corpora lutea, on total non-live or live implantation sites per litter, or on pre- or post-implantation loss. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of corpora lutea at 500 mg/kg/day associated, as expected, with a slight increase in the number of implantation sites/litter and a slight increase in live litter size. This finding was not observed at higher doses and is considered most likely due to biologic variation. The values at 500 mg/kg/day are still well within historical control values for these parameters.
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): no effects observed - Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Pregnancy rate was high and equivalent across all groups from 0 - 1000 mg/kg/day (95.5, 95.7, 91.3, and 95.2%, respectively); pregnancy rate was slightly lower (8 1.8%) at 2000 mg/kg/day.
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): not examined - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- not examined
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no statistically significant or biologically relevant differences among groups for prenatal mortality, expressed as resorptions or dead fetuses, or for prenatal toxicity, expressed as fetal body weight/litter for all fetuses or for male and female fetuses separately.
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment-related alterations in incidence of malformations pooled as external, visceral (including craniofacial), or skeletal, or as total malformations or variations. Examination of fetal malformations and variations by individual findings also indicated no findings which were treatment- or dose-related and none which appeared predominantly or exclusively at higher doses.
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no effects observed
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Ethylene glycol is not a developmental toxicant in the rabbit, no classification is warranted
- Executive summary:
The sensitivity of NZW rabbits relative to that of Sprague-Dawley rats and Swiss mice for maternal and developmental toxicity from gavage administration of EG during organogenesis can be determined for maternal toxicity: rabbits > mice > rats, and for developmental toxicity: mice > rats > rabbits.
Given that glycolic acid disposition between the maternal blood and the embryo is driven by the polarity of MCT1 and MCT4 isoforms in the placenta, that glycolic acid is sequestered in the rat and not the rabbit, and that the rabbit and human placenta show similar polarity to each other and opposite to that of the rodent, it is proposed that the rabbit is the most appropriate species for the basis of classification. As such, and since ethylene glycol is not a developmental toxicant in the rabbit, no classification is warranted.
Data source
Materials and methods
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(hydroxyethyl) terephthalate
- EC Number:
- 213-497-6
- EC Name:
- Bis(hydroxyethyl) terephthalate
- Cas Number:
- 959-26-2
- Molecular formula:
- C12H14O6
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(hydroxyethyl) terephthalate
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate value is read-across from supporting terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) data.
Test animals
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate value is read-across from supporting terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) data.
Rabbit selected for the read-across as most sensitive species
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effects observed
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) is not a developmental toxicant in the rabbit, no classification is warranted.
No evidence of maternal or developmental toxicity was seen in an inhalation study with rats exposed to terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0).
Based on the transformation products, BHET (959-26-2; 213-497-6) is not a developmental toxicant - Executive summary:
There was no evidence of terephthalic acid maternal or developmental toxicity in an OECD 414 GLP-compliant aerosol inhalation study with rats (OECD SIDS, 2001). The rats were dosed at levels up to 10.4 mg/m3. Administration of ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) to New Zealand White rabbits (0, 100, 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg bw/day; p.o.) caused mortality in 42% of the does as a result of renal failure. In the offspring, no effects upon survival, foetal weight, or the incidences of external, visceral, or skeletal malformations or variations were observed at any dose level, including the progeny of surviving does treated with 2000 mg/kg/day ethane-1,2-diol. Ethane-1,2-diol resulted in profound maternal toxicity at 2000 mg/kg/day (42% mortality; three early deliveries and one spontaneous abortion) associated with renal pathology (Tyl, et al., 1993) yet no developmental effects were noted in the progeny. Given that glycolic acid disposition between the maternal blood and the embryo is driven by the polarity of MCT1 and MCT4 isoforms in the placenta, that glycolic acid is sequestered in the rat and not the rabbit, and that the rabbit and human placenta show similar polarity to each other and opposite to that of the rodent (Moore, et al., 2016; Settle et al., 2004), it is proposed that the rabbit is the most appropriate species for the basis of classification. As such, and since ethylene glycol is not a developmental toxicant in the rabbit, no classification is warranted. Information on the source substances was considered to be directly applicable to an equivalent molar amount of the target substance; therefore, BHET as not developmentally toxic. BHET is predicted to have a NOAEL greater than 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.