Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 605-140-1 | CAS number: 158237-07-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Additional information
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex IX, column 2, testing of effects on terrestrial organisms is not required since direct and indirect exposure of the soil compartment for the substance 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-cyclohexyl-N-ethyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-tetrazole-1-carboxamide is unlikely. Furthermore, the evaluation of the PEC/PNEC ratio indicates no risk for the terrestrial compartment (RCR << 1). For detailed information, see Chemical Safety Report (CSR) chapter 9 and 10.
Studies on soil macroorganisms and soil microorganisms are available for 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-cyclohexyl-N-ethyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-tetrazole-1-carboxamide. The available short-term toxicity study on soil macroorganisms was conducted according to GLP standards and followed OECD guideline 207. Earthworms (Eisenia fetida) were exposed to five concentrations (100, 178, 316, 562, and 1000 mg/kg dry weight soil) in an artificial soil consisting of sand, clay mineral and peat. The determined LC50 (14 d) was >1000 mg/kg dry weight soil (nominal). A NOEC (14 d) of 100 mg/kg dry weight soil (nominal) based on weight alterations, the LOEC (14 d) was 178 mg/kg dry weight soil (nominal).
Two studies are available investigating the toxicity of the test substance to soil microorganisms. One study addresses the influence of the test item on nitrogen transformation in soils (1997a), and the second study the influence on carbon transformation (1997b). Both studies were conducted according to GLP and follow the principles of the "Guidelines for the Official Testing of Plant Protectants, Part VI, 1-1, Influence on the Activity of the Soil Microflora" (BBA Braunschweig, Germany, March 1990, 2nd ed.), equivalent to OECD guidelines 216 and 217 for nitrogen transformation and carbon transformation, respectively. In the first study (1997a) the influence of 0.81 mg and 8.05 mg test item/kg dry wt soil on nitrogen mineralization in two agricultural soils, i.e. a loamy sand (0.8% org. C, pH (KCl) 6.1) and a loamy silt (2.3% org. C, pH (KCl) 7.1) was tested. Both doses had no significant influence on the turnover of nitrogen in two different soils. It is therefore assumed that the test item does not have a significant influence on the nitrogen transformation, and an EC10 (28 d) of > 8.05 mg/kg soil dw and an EC50 (28 d) > 8.05 mg/kg soil dw can be derived. The same effect values were recorded in the carbon transformation test (1997b), using the same concentrations of test item as well as the same two soil types. During the 28-day experiment, the test substance had no influence on soil respiration after the addition of glucose to both of the test soils. It is therefore assumed that the test item has no significant influence on the nitrogen transformation.
Further data on terrestrial organisms is available but not relevant for the hazard and risk assessment and is provided for the sake of completeness only, i.e. data from contact tests with bees, a test with silkworm larvae, plant metabolism studies, and acute toxicity tests with birds. No mortalities and no effects were observed in both studies conducted with bees (1997a, 1997b). Thus, a LD50 > 150 µg per animal was determined. No mortality and no toxic symptoms were observed in the study with silkworm larvae (1994).
Two studies investigated the influence of the test substance on the metabolism in rice (1997a, 1997b). In the first study (1997a) the total radioactive residues in forage, straw and hulled rice was 0.164 mg/kg, 0.624 mg/kg and 0.040 mg/kg, respectively. From forage 93.5% of the TRR were extracted with a combination of conventional and microwave extraction steps and 6.5% remained in the solids. From straw, a total of 95.6% of the TRR was extracted. In the lignin and cellulose fraction 0.2% and 4.2% of the TRR, respectively, were found. From hulled rice, 27.1% of the TRR was dissolved in the first conventional extracts and 69.8% in the microwave extracts. Approximately 40% of the TRR was assumed as to be attributable to natural constituents such as starch. On the basis of the nature and amount of metabolites found in the extracts of forage, straw and hulled rice a degradation pathway were proposed. In all samples no parent compound was found. This was also observed in the second rice metabolism study (1997b). The metabolic degradation of the parent compound in paddy soil primarily occurred by hydrolytic cleavage with the formation of cyclohexylethylamine (CEA) and 2-chlorophenyltetrazolinone (CRT). The CEA part of the molecule was better degradable than the CPT part, but led to a higher portion of radioactivity bound to soil constituents [compare endpoint biodegradation in soil]. Since the TRRs in rice plants were very low in contrast to the results of the phenyl label study, it was considered that the test substance was mainly cleaved in soil/water before uptake. The primary metabolite CEA was further metabolized in rice plants. Hydroxylation of the cyclohexyl ring of CEA yielded three isomers (hydroxy-CEA). The finding of urea-dihydroxy-CEA indicated urea-CEA (Ncyclohexyl-N-ethylurea) as a possible intermediate. In forage and straw 49.1% (0.081 mg/kg) and 59.3% (0.369 mg/kg) of the TRR, respectively, were identified or characterized. From a total of 15 metabolites in the conventional and exhaustive extracts of forage and straw six metabolites were identified (forage: 3.0 - 13.4%, 0.005 mg/kg - 0.022 mg/kg; straw: 2.8 - 17.0%, 0.017 - 0.107 mg/kg). Nine unknown metabolites were present in very small quantities (forage: 2.1 - 9.1%, 0.004 - 0.015 mg/kg; straw: 1.1 - 7.5%, 0.007 - 0.047 mg/kg). In hulled rice all metabolites were equal to or less than 0.001 mg/kg (0.5 - 3.8%) except for radioactivity at the TLC origin (6.8%, 0.003 mg/kg). A total of 75.8% (0.031 mg/kg) of the TRR was identified or characterized. Comparing the individual amounts of metabolites in this study with the ones from the study (1997b) using another 14C-label, it was evident that the representative compounds for the residue definition were the CPT-acetic acid and CPT-lactic acid. As an example, the residue levels of the main metabolite CEA (forage: 0.017 mg/kg; straw: 0.107 mg/kg; hulled rice: 0.001 mg/kg) were only 1/9 - 1/28 times that of the main metabolite CPT-acetic acid (forage: 0.471 mg/kg; straw 0.919 mg/kg; hulled rice 0.024 mg/kg).
From the second study (1997b) the following conclusions were drawn. At harvest, most of the recovered radioactivity was found in the straw, followed by the rachis and the chaff. The lowest amount was detected in hulled rice (0.14 %; 0.048 mg/kg a.i. equiv.). These data indicated a rather low importance of the total radioactive residues in hulled rice which is for this crop the only commodity for human consumption. The extractability of the radioactivity from the forage, straw and hulled rice was enhanced by using microwave treatment after the standard extraction. In this way more than 90% of the radioactivity could be extracted from forage and straw. In case of hulled rice, ca. 30% (0.015 mg/kg a.i. equiv.) remained in the solids. The radioactive residue in this sample was characterised as to be incorporated into natural constituents (amino acid, starch and protein fraction). On the basis of the nature and amount of metabolites found in the extracts of forage, straw and hulled rice a degradation pathway could be proposed. After uptake of the test item and/or the soil degradation compound 2-chlorophenyltetrazolinone (CPT), this primary metabolite was conjugated with acetyl serine (cysteine synthase) or serine (tryptophane synthase) forming the conjugate CPT-alanine. Via the intermediate compound CPT-pyruvic acid which could not be detected the final metabolites CPT-lactic acid and especially CPT-acetic acid were formed. In all samples no parent substance was found. The most important metabolite was CPT-acetic acid because it was found in high yield in all raw agricultural commodities (forage: 50.28 % of TRR, 0.471 mg/kg; straw: at least 43.02 % of TRR, 1.023 mg/kg; hulled rice: 48.42 % of TRR, 0.024 mg/kg a.i. equiv.). Similar metabolites were also found for example in case of several triazole-ring containing fungicides (i.e. Tebuconazole), and aminotriazole. These highly effective detoxification reactions are therefore of common importance for the metabolism in plants of such compounds. The low amount of CPT/CPTmethyl found in the different samples (< 5 %, < 0.05 mg/kg) additionally proved the given considerations of the main biodegradation pathway of the 14C-labeled test substance in rice plants. The major metabolites CPT-acetic acid and CPT-lactic acid were proposed as important for the residue definition.
In two feeding studies with Quails (1995, 1999) the LD50 was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg, the highest dose tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.