Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
reaction mass of: pentasodium bis[6-anilino-3,5'-disulfonatonaphthalene-2-azobenzene-1,2'-diolato]cobaltate(III);tetrasodium [6-anilino-3,5'-disulfonatonaphthalene-2-azobenzene-1,2'-diolato][6-anilino-5'-sulfamoyl-3-sulfonatonaphthalene-2-azobenzene-1,2'-diolato]cobaltate(III);trisodium bis[6-anilino-5'-sulfamoyl-3-sulfonatonaphthalene-2-azobenzene-1,2'-diolato]cobaltate(III)
EC number: 444-290-0 | CAS number: 508202-43-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 444-290-0
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 508202-43-5
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable
- IUPAC Name:
- tricobalt(3+) dodecasodium tris(2-[2-(2-oxido-5-sulfamoylphenyl)diazen-1-yl]-6-(phenylamino)-3-sulfonatonaphthalen-1-olate) tris(2-[2-(2-oxido-5-sulfonatophenyl)diazen-1-yl]-6-(phenylamino)-3-sulfonatonaphthalen-1-olate)
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 MIX
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- -Pre-experiment: 20.6, 61.7,185.2, 555.6,1666.7 and 5000 µg/plate
On basis of the pre-experiment results:
- Main tests: 312.5, 625,1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle used: DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation (S9)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, 2-AA
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation (S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
The plates with the selective agar (minimal agar plates) were made in-house. Each Petri dish contained about 20.0 ml of minimal agar (1.5% agar supplemented with 2% salts of the Vogel-Bonner Medium E and 2% glucose). The agar used was Select AGAR, GIBCO BRL, Switzerland. Glucose was delivered from Merck, Germany [D(+)glucose, anhydrous]. The Vogel-Bonner Medium E was prepared in-house.
The overlay agar contained per litre:
6.0 g GIBCO BRL Select Agar
6.0 g NaCl (Merck, Germany)
Sterilisation was performed at 121° C in an autoclave, cooled down to 50°C and dispensed into glass bottles. On day of test performance the aga was molten in a water bath and 10% aliquots (v/v) of 0.5 mM L-histidine / 0.5 mM d-biotin for Salmonella strains or 0.5 mM tryptophan, dissolved in bidistilled water, for E.coli strains were added sterile filtered. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding solvent control is observed. A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant If the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration. An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment. A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative controls such an increase Is not considered biologically relevant.
- Statistics:
- A statistical analysis was not required. The use of statistical methods concerning this particular test system was not generally recommended
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- -Pre-experiment: normal background growth was observad with both strains(S. typhimurium TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA). The number of revertant colonies was not reduced at any concentrations tested. The test item did not precipitate on the surface of the agar plates.
-Main tests: The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both experiments. No reduction in the number of revertant colonies occurred at any concentration tested in comparison with the respective solvent control. The test item did not precipitate on the surface of the agar plates. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with test item at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor in the absence of an metabolic activation system. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls. They showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
The test item was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations, according to the OECD Guideline 471 (1983) and method B.14 EEC-Directive 2000/32/EC. The plate incorporation test (first experiment with and without metabolic activation, second experiment without activation) and the pre-incubation test (second experiment with metabolic activation) were performed using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA 98, TA 1537, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA. The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Negative (solvent) and positive control treatments were included for all strains. Each concentration and the controls were tested in triplicate. The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and tested at five concentrations from 312.5 to 5000 µg/plate. Each strain was additionally tested In the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system with a suitable, known mutagen as positive control. Previously, a pre-experiment for toxicity was carried out with strains S. typhimurium TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA to determine the highest concentration to be used in the mutagenicity assay.From the results obtained, the highest concentration suitable for the first mutagenicity test was selected. Both in the first and the second mutagenicity main tests, with and without metabolic activation, no substantial increase in the number of revertant colonies was observed after treatment with substance at any concentrations. In both mutagenicity tests normal background growth was observed with all strains at all concentrations. The number of revertant colonies was not reduced. The test item did not precipitate on the surface of the agar plates. The mean numbers of revertant colonies on negative control plates were found to be within acceptable ranges. The positive controls induced appropriate increases in the number of revertant colonies in all experiments, thus demonstrating the correct strain functioning and the activity of the S9-mix.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base-pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.