Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Endpoint summary

Administrative data

Description of key information

Additional information

Short-term toxicity to fish

The substance is with high probability acutely not harmful to fish. (96 -h LC50 = 145mg/L, measured, Cairs and Nebeker, 1982).

 

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

The substance with high probability acutely not harmful to aquatic invertebrates (48 -h EC50 = 120 mg/L, Le Blanc, 1980).

 

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

A geometric mean of the lower and upper chronic endpoints, as determined in early-life-stage tests, was 14 mg/L (based on measured test concentrations, Cairns and Nebeker, 1982).

 

Toxicity to aquatic algae

The substance is with high probability acutely not harmful to algae (72 -h ErC50 = 205.2 mg/L, NITE, 2020).

 

Toxicity to microorganisms

Depending on local conditions and existing concentrations, disturbances in the biodegradation process of activated sludge are possible.

(3 h EC50 = 100 mg/L, Yoshioka and al.,1986).

 

Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic invertebrates:

Experimental data on the endocrine toxicity of CAS 78-59-1 to aquatic organisms are published in EPA Memorandum (2015). One short-term test with fish as a test organism (2012) was performed according to the OECD Guideline 229. The test concentrations were 0 control, 0.8, 8 and 80 mg/L Adult survival in both sexes at all treatment levels was 100%; since no mortality was observed. Male and female body weight were both significantly (p<0.05) reduced 24% of control at the 79.8 mg/L treatment level. Female VTG was significantly (p<0.05) reduced 44 and 77% of control at the 7.62 and 79.8 mg/L treatment levels, respectively. Fecundity was significantly (p<0.05) reduced 94% at the 79.8 mg/L treatment. There was a significant reduction in fertility (p<0.05) at the 79.8 mg/L treatment level, which was reduced 70% compared to the control. There were no other significant effects on endpoints. Although not analyzed statistically, there were no treatment-related histopathological observations in males, but there was there was an increase in incidence of mild to moderate oocyte atresia at the 79.8 mg/L treatment level compared to the control in female fish, as well as a slight decrease in gonadal stage.

The second study was performed with a frog as a test organism (2011). The test was conducted according to OECD Guideline 231. The test lasted 21 days and the test concentrations were: control, 0.6, 6 and 60 mg/LThere were no significant effects on Day 7 or Day 21 developmental endpoints (i.e., developmental stage, normalized HLL). Similarly, no Day 7 growth endpoints were significantly affected by isophorone. However, both Day 21 wet weight (15% reduction, Jonckheere’s,p= 0.016) and Day 21 SVL (5% reduction, Jonckheere’s,p= 0.013) were significantly reduced at the mean-measured 59.0 mg /L treatment group, relative to the negative control. There were no treatment-related thyroid or other histopathological effects.

The analytical measurements of the test item concentrations were performed in both studies. The mean recovery of the test substance in a study with a fish ranged between 1.2 and 3.4%. In the study with a frog the mean recovery of isophorone was in the range between 0.767 and 6.34%. The results of both studies are based on the mean-measured test concentrations.