Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1999-05-05 to 1999-09-06
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2000
Report date:
2000

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted July 21, 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
Version / remarks:
EPA 712-C-98-221, August 1998
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,5-difluoroaniline
EC Number:
206-752-8
EC Name:
3,5-difluoroaniline
Cas Number:
372-39-4
Molecular formula:
C6H5F2N
IUPAC Name:
3,5-difluoroaniline
Test material form:
other: solid

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: CeII Line L5178Y
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640-HAT and nomral RPMI 1640 medium to reduce the amount of spontaneous mutants
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: Yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix - Phenobarbital i.p. and β-Naphthoflavone induced
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I (with S9 mix, 4 h): 20.3, 40.6, 81.3, 162.5, 325.0 µg/mL
Experiment I (without S9 mix, 4 h); Experiment II (without S9 mix, 24 h): 40.6, 81.3, 162.5, 325.0, 650.0 µg/mL
Experiment II (with S9 mix, 4 h): 25.0, 50.0, 100.0, 200.0, 400.0 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures.
The final concentration of DMSO in the culture medium did not exceed 0.5 % (v/v).
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
dissolved in DMSO
Positive control substance:
3-methylcholanthrene
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
MMS: 13 µg/mL; 3-MC 3 µg/mL
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: In medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 72 hours

After the expression period the cultures were seeded into microtiter plates.
Cells from each experimental group were seeded into 2 microtiter plates so that each well contained approximately 4x 10^3 cells in selective medium (see below) with TFT (SERVA, D-69042 Heidelberg).
The cloning efficiency (viability) was determined by seeding about 2.5 cells per well into microtiter plates (same medium without TFT). The plates are incubated at 37°C in 4.5 % CO2 / 95.5 % humidified air for 10 - 15 days to determine the plating efficiency and to evaluate mutagenicity. Then the plates were evaluated manually.

Culture medium: RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15 % horse serum (HS), 100 U/100 µg/mL Penicilin/ Streptomycin, 220 µg/mL Sodium-Pyruvate, and 1.25 U/mL Amphotericin used as antifungal.

Cloning Medium:
RPMI 1640 (complete culture medium)

Selective Medium:
RPMI 1640 (complete culture medium) by addition of 5 µg/m TFT.

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 x 10E7

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Relative total growth
Test article concentrations between 10.2 and 1300 µg/mL (with and without S9-mix) were used to evaluate toxicity.


Evaluation criteria:
A test substance is classified as positive if it induces either a reproducible concentration related increase in the mutant frequency or a reproducible positive response for at least one of the test points.

A test substance producing neither a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.

A significant response is described as follows:
The test substance is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces with at least one of the concentrations a mutation frequency that is two times higher than the mean spontaneous mutation frequency in the experiment.

The test substance is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered independently of an enhancement factor for induced mutants.

However, in the evaluation of the test results the historical variability of the mutation rates in negative and solvent controls and the mutation rates of all negative and solvent controls of this study are taken into consideration.

Results of test groups are rejected if either, the relative total growth or relative suspension growth is less than 10 % of the solvent control or the cloning efficiency II after the expression period is less than 20 %.
Statistics:
No statistical evaluation is required.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No
- Effects of osmolality: No
- Precipitation: No

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
After 4 hours of treatment strong toxic effects were observed at 325.0 µg/mL and above in the absence and at 81.3 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The highest negative control value (127 colonies) and the highest solvent control value (121 colonies) exceeded the range of our historical control values slightly. This effect was considered as irrelevant since the corresponding solvent or negative control was well within the range of the historical controls.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In experiment I, strong toxic effects occurred at 650 µg/mL in the absence and 81.3 µg/mL and above in both parallel cultures in the presence of metabolic activation (4 h treatment).
Strong toxic effects were observed in the second experiment at 650 µg/mL without metabolic activation (continuous treatment for 24 h) and at 25 µg/mL and above in both parallel cultures with metabolic activation (4 h treatment).
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Summary of experiment I

 

 

Experiment I, culture I

 

Experiment I, culture II

 

 

Per ml

mix

Relative cloning efficiency I

Relative total growth

Mutant colonies/ 108 Cells

Induction factor

Relative cloning efficiency I

Relative total growth

Mutant colonies/ 108 Cells

Induction factor

Column

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Neg. control with medium

 

-

100.0

100.0

29

 

100.0

100.0

43

 

Neg. control with DMSO

 

-

100.0

100.0

50

1.0

100.0

100.0

70

1.0

Pos. control with MMS

13.0

-

53.2

82.0

124

2.5

92.8

84.9

193

2.7

Test substance

20.3

-

101.5

Culture was not continued

 

74.5

Culture was not continued

 

Test substance

40.6

-

97.1

131.5

48

1.0

84.3

127.0

55

0.8

Test substance

81.3

-

109.5

93.7

52

1.0

94.8

90.5

50

0.8

Test substance

162.5

-

133.2

88.7

46

0.9

107.9

90.3

73

1.0

Test substance

325.0

-

82.8

39.3

71

1.4

103.8

53.4

56

0.8

Test substance

650.0

-

41.4

20.0

60

1.2

47.7

24.5

61

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neg. control with medium

 

+

100.0

100.0

72

 

100.0

100.0

86

 

Neg. control with DMSO

 

+

100.0

100.0

71

1.0

100.0

100.0

47

1.0

Pos. control with 3-MC

 3.0

+

96.9

68.5

221

3.1

118.7

81.2

199

4.2

Test substance

20.3

+

61.8

43.5

63

0.9

64.9

51.3

47

1.0

Test substance

40.6

+

49.8

44.5

91

1.3

74.1

29.0

72

1.5

Test substance

81.3

+

32.1

22.0

110

1.6

40.0

26.2

91

1.9

Test substance

162.5

+

34.3

14.8

132

1.9

35.6

22.7

69

1.5

Test substance

325.0

+

16.0

13.9

93

1.3

20.3

7.5

141

3.0

Test substance

650.0

+

1.7

Culture was not continued

 

2.5

Culture was not continued

 

   

 

 

Summary of experiment II

 

 

 

 

Experiment II, culture I

 

Experiment II, culture II

 

 

Per ml

mix

Relative cloning efficiency I

Relative total growth

Mutant colonies/ 108 Cells

Induction factor

Relative cloning efficiency I

Relative total growth

Mutant colonies/ 108 Cells

Induction factor

Column

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Neg. control with medium

 

-

100.0

100.0

80

 

100.0

100.0

91

 

Neg. control with DMSO

 

-

100.0

100.0

54

1.0

100.0

100.0

64

1.0

Pos. control with MMS

13.0

-

28.2

33.6

604

11.1

47.4

36.4

690

10.8

Test substance

20.3

-

74.2

Culture was not continued

 

133.5

Culture was not continued

 

Test substance

40.6

-

66.1

51.0

106

1.9

101.9

60.8

120

1.9

Test substance

81.3

-

60.5

69.7

69

1.3

91.3

134.1

44

0.7

Test substance

162.5

-

26.5

68.5

65

1.2

83.9

88.9

65

1.0

Test substance

325.0

-

43.1

34.1

69

1.3

65.6

75.6

72

1.1

Test substance

650.0

-

13.9

14.0

133

2.4

32.2

30.8

113

1.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neg. control with medium

 

+

100.0

100.0

112

 

100.0

100.0

127

 

Neg. control with DMSO

 

+

100.0

100.0

121

1.0

100.0

100.0

103

1.0

Pos. control with 3-MC

3.0

+

57.6

84.4

283

2.3

86.7

77.2

280

2.7

Test substance

12.5

+

44.0

Culture was not continued

 

32.5

Culture was not continued

 

Test substance

25.0

+

27.0

35.4

117

1.0

28.8

21.4

147

1.4

Test substance

50.0

+

28.9

18.3

187

1.6

24.6

12.3

155

1.5

Test substance

100.0

+

9.0

8.7

330

2.7

14.0

7.3

219

2.1

Test substance

200.0

+

12.2

5.2

344

2.9

6.4

5.2

174

1.7

Test substance

400.0

+

1.3

0.8

438

3.6

0.9

0.3

311

3.0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative