Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2007-09-24 to 2007-10-25
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) for irritating potential
Version / remarks:
according to Lüpke (Fd. Chem. Tox. 1985; 23 (2):287-291), with modifications described by Kalweit (Toxic. in vitro 1990; 4 (4/5):702-706)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
During the second part of the 1980's, with a growing number of chemicals to be tested and due to an increasing awareness towards the need to protect animals from painful experiments, the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test (HET-CAM) was developed. The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of fertilized and incubated hen eggs provides a suitable model for membranes with an intact and functional vascular system. The CAM has no nerve fibers in the early stages of development and is regarded as being insensitive to pain. For these reasons, the HET-CAM is believed to be a reliable alternative to the primary eye irritation test in rabbits, which does not conflict with ethical and legal aspects of animal protection.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-ethoxy-2,3-difluoro-4-{4-[(1s,4r)-4-propylcyclohexyl]cyclohex-1-en-1-yl}benzene
EC Number:
603-006-7
Cas Number:
124728-62-7
Molecular formula:
C23H34F2O
IUPAC Name:
1-ethoxy-2,3-difluoro-4-{4-[(1s,4r)-4-propylcyclohexyl]cyclohex-1-en-1-yl}benzene
Test material form:
solid: crystalline

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: hen's eggs, fertilized
Strain:
other: White leghorn
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
-Source: LSL Rhein Main Geflügelvermehrungsbetrieb, Dieburg, Germany

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount / concentration applied:
The tip of a spatula of the test item was applied on the vascular chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). The application volume of the reference material was 0.3 mL.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Only eggs without injuries of the membrane or other abnormalities were used for testing. After application of the test material, the blood vessels, including the capillary system, and the albumin were examined and scored for irritating effects (haemorrhage, lysis, and coagulation) over a period of 300 sec. The period between treatment and the onset of the reactions was measured in seconds and recorded with stopwatch and protocol.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 eggs were used
Details on study design:
The irritating potential of the test item was determined in the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM). Fertile hen eggs on day 10 of incubation provided the test system. The eggshell was removed around the air cell by means of a dentist drill and the shell with attached outer membrane and inner egg membrane was carefully opened. After the membrane had been moistened with isotonic sodium chloride solution, it was removed to expose the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the fertilized eggs, which lies immediately below. After application of the test material, the blood vessels, including the capillary system, and the albumin were examined and scored for irritating effects (haemorrhage, lysis, and coagulation) over a period of 300 sec. As reference material dodecyl sulfate sodium salt was tested and evaluated to ensure the sensitivity of the system.

Scoring system according to: Lüpke, NP (1985) Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 23 (2), 287-291.
Cumulative score Assessment of irritancy
0 – 0.9 None
1 – 4.9 Mild
5 - 8.9 Moderate
9 - 21 Severe

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Value:
0
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Score: 9.69
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item showed no irritating effects in the HET-CAM test.
Executive summary:

The irritating potential of the test item was determined in the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM). This test is routinely used as a screening assay prior to in vivo tests in rabbits for eye irritation. Fertile hen eggs on day 10 of incubation provided the test system. The eggshell was removed around the air cell by means of a dentist drill. The shell with attached outer membrane and inner egg membrane was carefully opened. After the membrane had been moistened with isotonic sodium chloride solution, it was removed to expose the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the fertilized eggs, which lies immediately below. After application of the test material, the blood vessels, including the capillary system, and the albumin were examined and scored for irritating effects (haemorrhage, lysis, and coagulation) over a period of 300 sec. As reference material dodecyl sulfate sodium salt was tested and evaluated to ensure the sensitivity of the system. For the test item a cumulative score of 0 (no irritancy) was obtained, while dodecyl sulfate sodium salt as reference material gave a score of 9.69 (severe irritancy). Under the given experimental conditions, the test item showed no irritating effects in the HET-CAM test.