Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03 - 05 Aug 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
28 July 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
06 July 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
OGYÉI, Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet, Budapest, Hungary

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol
EC Number:
201-815-6
EC Name:
3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol
Cas Number:
88-26-6
Molecular formula:
C15H24O2
IUPAC Name:
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenol
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source of test material: Rahn AG, Zürich, Switzerland

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, dry conditions. Protect from heat and direct sunlight


In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: adult human (no further information provided)
Justification for test system used:
The EPISKIN model has been validated for irritation testing. It is used as a replacement for the Draize Skin Irritation test (OECD TG 404) for the purpose of distinguishing between skin irritating and non-skin irritating test substances.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiSkinTM Small Model (EpiSkinTMSM), manufactured by EPISKIN SNC Lyon, France
- Tissue batch number(s): 16-EKIN-031
- Date of initiation of testing: 03 Aug 2016

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37°C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Volume of washing steps: rinsed thoroughly with 25 mL PBS 1x solution
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: no
- Modifications to validated SOP: no

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 0.3 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours (± 5 min)
- Wavelength: 570 nm

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: 22.1 ± 0.2
- Barrier function: 2.8 mg/mL
- Morphology: Well-differentiated epidermis consisting of a basal layer, several spinous and granular layers and a thick stratum corneum
- Contamination: no
- Reproducibility: yes

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
- Method of calculation used:
Blank: The mean of 6 blank OD values is calculated
Negative control:
- Individual negative control OD values are corrected with the mean blank OD:
OD Negative Control (ODNC) = ODNC raw (ODNC raw value) – OD blank mean
- The corrected mean OD of the 3 negative control values is calculated, which corresponds to 100% viability
Positive control:
- Individual positive control OD values are corrected with the mean blank OD: :
OD Positive Control (ODPC) = ODPC raw – OD blank mean
- The corrected mean OD of the 3 positive control values is calculated
- The % viability for each positive control replicate is calculated relative to the mean negative control:
% Positive Control 1 = (ODPC1 / mean ODNC) ×100
- The mean value of the 3 individual viability % for positive control is calculated:
Mean PC % = (%PC1 + %PC2 + %PC3) / 3
Test item:
- Individual test item OD values are corrected with the mean blank OD: :
OD Treated Tissue (ODTT) = ODTT raw – OD blank mean
- The corrected mean OD of the 3 test item values is calculated
- The % viability for each test item replicate is calculated relative to the mean negative control:
% Treated Tissue 1 = (ODTT1 / mean ODNC) ×100
% Treated Tissue 2 = (ODTT2 / mean ODNC) ×100
% Treated Tissue 3 = (ODTT3 / mean ODNC) ×100
- The mean value of the 3 individual viability % for test item is calculated
Mean TT % = (%TT1 + %TT2 + %TT3) / 3

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive or irritant to skin if the mean relative viability after 15 minutes exposure and 42 h post incubation is less or equal to 50% of the negative control.
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive or non-irritant to skin if the tissue viability after exposure and post-treatment incubation is more than 50% of the negative control.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 10 mg (the epidermal surface was moistened with 5 µl deionised water to improve skin contact)

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 10 μL

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied:10 μL
- Concentration (if solution): 5 %
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15 min
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 ± 1 h
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
mean value of negative control (DPBS)
Value:
100
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
mean value of positive control (5% SDS)
Value:
16
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
mean value of test item (10 mg/ 0.38 cm²)
Value:
80
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
- Direct-MTT reduction: no
- Colour interference with MTT: no

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: yes

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
The mean OD value of the three negative control tissues should be between 0.6 and 1.5 and the standard deviation value (SD) of the % viability should be ≤ 18.
The acceptable mean percentage viability range for positive controls is 0-40% and the standard deviation value (SD) of the % viability should be ≤ 18.
For test chemicals, the standard deviation value (SD) of the % viability should be ≤ 18.

- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: MTT assay after 3 h (± 5 min) exposure

Substance

Tissue No.

OD570

OD570 (mean)

Relative viability
[%]

Relative viability (mean)

[%]

Standard Deviation of relative viability
[%]

Negative
Control

1

0.823

0.766

107

100

8.20

2

0.776

101

3

0.699

91

Positive
Control

1

0.117

0.119

15

16

0.22

2

0.119

16

3

0.120

16

Test
Item

1

0.702

0.611

92

80

11.04

2

0.594

78

3

0.535

70

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/ EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified