Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The substance tested full strength by application of 0.01ml of undiluted sample to an area upon the clipped belly of an albino rabbit caused severe injury like that caused by morpholine (no further data).
The substance is corrosive to the eye according to the Draize scoring method: Corneal involvement, irritation or eye damage that persists for more than 21 days after treatment.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
no data
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Limited publication
Principles of method if other than guideline:
no information
Species:
rabbit
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (corrosive)
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
Citraconic acid anhydride tested full strength by application of 0.01ml of undiluted sample to an area upon the clipped belly of an albino rabbit caused severe injury like that caused by morpholine (no further data).
Executive summary:

Citraconic acid anhydride tested full strength by application of 0.01ml of undiluted sample to an area upon the clipped belly of an albino rabbit caused severe injury like that caused by morpholine (no further data).

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (corrosive)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was performed according to methods similar to OECD 405, not accoring to GLP. Details on test substance and results are limited.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Japanese white rabbits
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Takeo breeder NII-Electronic Library Service
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0-2.2 kg
- Housing:housed in metal cages (39 X 40 X 44 cm)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): fed the RC4 diet (Oriental Yeast Co., Tokyo, Japan), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period:

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):25 ± 1°C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 5%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: no data
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: The right eye was served as a blank.
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application
Observation period (in vivo):
The eyes were examined and the grade of ocular reaction was recorded 1, 4, 24, 48, 72, 96hr, 7, 14 and 21 days after the treatment of chemicals.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 females
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE: none

SCORING SYSTEM: Corneal opacity, erythema, chemosis, secreta and iritis were classified according to the Draize score

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: no data
Irritation parameter:
other:
Basis:
other: all animals
Time point:
other: up to 21 days
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Score III: Corrosive
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The only data given is that the outcome of the test is corrosive for this test substance. This is confirmed by a QSAR.
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
The test substance is corrosive to the eye according to the Draize scoring method: Corneal involvement, irritation or eye damage that persists for more than 21 days after treatment.
Executive summary:

The test substance is corrosive to the eye according to the Draize scoring method: Corneal involvement, irritation or eye damage that persists for more than 21 days after treatment.

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
No valid data available. K4: Limited publication

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
K2: The study was performed according to methods similar to OECD 405, not accoring to GLP. Details on test substance and results are limited.

Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: corrosive

Effects on eye irritation: corrosive

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data the substance is classified cat.1 (irreversible effects on the eye) for the eye and Cat. 1B (corrosive) for skin.