Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Endpoint summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Description of key information

The substance did not cause skin irritation/corrosion in the animals tested. An eye irritation test demonstrated that slight (but not significant) eye irritation was seen following instillation of the substance in the eye. As these effects occurred in only at 24 hours in 1/3 test animals and were fully reversible the substance is hence classified as non-irritating. There are no data for respiratory irritation, the weight of evidence  would suggest that respiratory irritation is unlikely to occur. 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Skin irritation

A GLP compliant study (OECD 404) was conducted to determine the skin irritation/corrosion potential of the substance. The substance did not cause skin irritation/corrosion in the animals tested. Thus the substance is not classified as a skin irritant/corrosive.

Eye irritation

A GLP compliant study (OECD 405) was conducted to determine the eye irritation/corrosion potential of the substance.

The substance caused reversible eye redness in 1/3 animals at the 24 hours time point. However, as the mean score (24, 48 and 72 hours) for the redness was lower than 2 thus classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 is not required. The substance did not cause corrosion or classifiable irritation in the eye. Respiratory irritation

There is no data for respiratory irritation, the weight of evidence would suggest that respiratory irritation is unlikely to occur.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The substance did not cause skin irritation/corrosion in any other the animals tested, thus classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 is not required.

The substance caused reversible eye redness in 1/3 animals at the 24 hours time point. However, as the mean score (24, 48 and 72 hours) for the reddness was lower than 2 thus classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 is not required.

There is no data for respiratory irritation, the weight of evidence coupled with the physiochemical properties would suggest that respiratory irritation is unlikely to occur. Thus classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 is not required.