Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 17th 2014- February 12th 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(The room temperature punctually reached 22.5°C(less than one hour at day 47)).
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Water solubility (under test conditions): soluble in cold water
-Water content : 1.5 %

Analytical monitoring:
not required
Vehicle:
no
Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Method of mixing into soil
The test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside” is soluble in water.
A stock solution of the test item was prepared in deionised water at 3 g/L.
The intended test item concentrations in soil were achieved by adding the corresponding volume of test item stock solution in the desired mass of artificial soil and mixing it for 5 minutes.
For the lower concentrations (29.8 to 312.5 mg/L), the corresponding volume of test item stock solution was diluted in deionised water in order to reach 250 ml and then added to the artificial soil and mixed for 5 minutes. This step allows homogeneous mixing of the test item in the artificial soil.
The final moisture content in the soils was then adjusted by adding deionised water. The soils have been mixed again for 5 minutes.
Test organisms (species):
Eisenia fetida
Animal group:
annelids
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Eisenia fetida
- Source: breeding in test facility
- Age at test initiation: Between 5 and 7 months
- Weight at test initiation (mean and range, SD):
At the initiation of the test, 30 worms were randomly sampled from the test population and weighted :
Mean value : 404.2 mg
Minimal value : 324.1 mg
Maximal value : 580.9 mg
Standard deviation : 60.4

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 24 hours in artificial soil
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same as the test
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): no mortality
Study type:
laboratory study
Substrate type:
artificial soil
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
56 d
Post exposure observation period:
None
Test temperature:
Stabilized in the range of 18 to 22°C during the exposure period, the room temperature reached 22.5°C at day 47, during less than one hour.
pH:
See Table 2 for pH measurments at day 0, day 28 and day 56 for control and test concentrations.
Moisture:
See Table 3 for moisture measurments at day 0, day 28 and day 56 for control and test concentrations.
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): Glass containers (177 cm2 X 7 cm)
- Amount of soil or substrate: around 500g dry mass corresponding to a layer of 5-6 cm
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 4
- No. of replicates per control: 8

SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
Artificial soil prepared according to the guideline recommandations
- Composition :
10% blond sphagnum peat air dried and finely ground
20% kaolin (acid washed powder)
70% air dried quartz sand (HN38) containing 94.9% of particles between 50 and 200µm
0.3% Calcium carbonate
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weigth): 78.8
- pH measured with KCl : 5.9

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 hours light - 8 hours darkness
- Light intensity: range from 415 to 782 Lux

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Mortality and growth of adults after 4 weeks exposure
- Reproductive output (number of juveniles per test condition) after 8 weeks exposure

VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 1.6
- Range finding study : Mortality of adults after 14 days exposure, 2 replicates per concentration
- Test concentrations( in mg/kg dry mass): 0.1 - 1.0 - 10 - 100 - 1 000
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: 15 % mortality after 14 days at 1 000 mg/kg (dry mass)
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal test concentrations (in mg/kg dry mass): 29.8 - 47.7 - 76.3 - 122.1 - 195.3 - 312.5 - 500.0 - 800.0
No test concentration measurments were performed
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Benomyl at 1 and 3 mg/kg (dry mass)
Key result
Duration:
28 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
500 mg/kg soil dw
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks:
adults
Duration:
28 d
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
800 mg/kg soil dw
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks:
adults
Duration:
56 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
800 mg/kg soil dw
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Remarks on result:
other: Highest tested concentration
Details on results:
- Mortality of adults at end of 28 days exposure : 2.5 % at 29.8 mg/kg dry masse, 12.5 % at 800 mg/kg dry mass (see table 4 for details)
- Morphological abnormalities: None
- Behavioural abnormalities: None

- Total mass of adults at beginning of test: See table 4
- Changes in body weigth of live adults (% of initial weight) at end of exposure period: See table 4
- No. of offspring produced: See table 6
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Reference item :
Two concentrations of Benomyl were prepared (1 and 3 mg/kg dry mass) and four replicates per concentration were performed.
Considering the use of solvent (acetone) to prepare refernce substance concentrations, foru solvent controls were prepared

- Relevant effect levels: at 3 mg/kg dry mass
*Mean change of the body fresh weight = 19.7% versus 88.4% for solvent control , corresponding to 77.8% inhibition compared to solvent control
*Reproductive output = 0 juveniles per replicate, corresponding to 100% reproduction inhibition compared to solvent control

Reported statistics and error estimates:
For the test performed with the test item, significant differences in changes in mean body weight and reproductive output were calculated using one way ANOV (p-value <5) followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test (p-value <5), after verification of the normality and the homogeneity of data ( Toxstat 3.5, Western Inc and D. Gulley, University of Wyoming).
For the test performed with thereference item, significant differences in changes in mean body weight and reproductive output were calculated using one way ANOVA (p-value <5) followed by theDunett's test (p-value <5), after verification of the normality and the homogeneity of data ( Toxstat 3.5, Western Inc and D. Gulley, University of Wyoming).

RESULTS


1 - REFERENCE ITEM
After exposure to the artificial soil containing 1.0 mg/kg (dry mass) of reference item, the fresh body weight increase (7.4% relative to the control) and reproduction output (-22.7% relative to the control) were not statistically different by comparison with the data recorded for the worms exposed to the solvent control soil.
Significant differences were observed for the organisms exposed to the reference item at 3.0 mg/kg of soil (dry mass). The following observations were made:
- A statistically significant reduction of the body fresh weight increase (-77.8%
relative to the solvent control)
- A total inhibition of reproduction.


These results, summarised in Table 4, confirmed the appropriate sensitivity of the test organisms.


Table 4: Results of the reproduction test performed with the reference item













































 Solvent controlReference item concentration
(mg/kg dry mass)
 1.03.0
Mortality after 4 weeks exposure0.0%0.0%0.0%
Mean change in body fresh weight
after 4 weeks exposure
88.4%94.9%19.7%*
Variation of body weight
(compared to control)
/7.4%-77.8*
Reproductive output
(juveniles per replicate)
90.570.00.0*
Variation of reproductive output
(compared to the control)
/-22.7%-100.0%*

*Results statistically significant (one-way ANOVA (p-value < 0.05) followed by the Dunnett’s post-hoc test (p-value < 0.05)), Toxstat 3.5, Western Inc. and D. Gulley, University of Wyoming.


The experiment on the reference item was designed to encompass the EC50 value and to check that this value was included in the appropriate range of concentration. Twoconcentrations were tested: 1 and 3 mg benomyl /kg of soil (dry mass) and compared to a solvent control.
Each solvent control replicate produced more than 30 juveniles by the end of the test and no mortality was recorded in such control. The coefficient of variation of the reproduction endpoint (e.g. 30.9%) exceeded slightly the 30% threshold require by the OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals n°222 (see paragraph V. Validity Criteria). However in such case (i.e. use of four replicate of solvent control), the suitability of this validity criterion needs to be discussed and can’t be directly transposed as the CV of reproduction for control is generally calculated on six to eight control replicates (depending on the test design for NOEC, ECx determination or combined approach). Given that (i) that the CV of reproduction calculated for the test item assay performed during the same period didn’t exceed 27%, and (ii) that the results obtained for reproduction in both reference item (mean = 90.5; SD = 27.9) and test item assay (mean = 106.3; SD = 28.6) are similar, it can therefore be assumed that this slightly higher CV for the solvent control didn’t invalid the results of the test with reference item.


 


2 - TEST ITEM CONCENTRATIONS PH AND WATER CONTENTS MEASUREMENTS
The pH values and the water content in control soil and test item concentrations are summarised in the Table 5.
Table 5: pH and water content measured in test concentrations and in controls during the study




















































































































Nominal test item
concentration
(mg/kg dry mass)

pH
Water content (%)
Day 0Day 28Day 56Day 0Day 28Day 56Variation between Day 0
and Day 56
 Control5.66.8 7.1 42.8 43.3 45.4 6%
 29.85.5 6.6 7.1  43.2 42.6 45.66%
 47.75.5 6.7 7.0  42.9 43.2 46.58%
 76.35.6 6.6 7.0  43.1 43.7 43.00%
 122.15.6 6.8 6.9  42.9 41.7 44.54%
 195.35.56.9 6.9  42.6 45.4 45.77%
 312.55.5 6.9 7.0  43.0 43.0 47.19%
 500.05.5 6.8 6.9  42.8 42.5 46.89%
 800.05.5 6.8 6.9  42.7 42.9 46.89%


 


The water content in soil didn’t vary more than 9 % between the beginning and the end of the test.


 


3 - MORTALITY AND GROWTH OF ADULTS EARTHWORMS
Results obtained for fresh body weight variations and mortality are presented in Tables 6.
After four weeks of exposure, no significant increase of the mortality was observed up to 500.0 mg/kg of soil (dry mass) and no mortality was observed in the control replicates. At 800 mg/kg of soil (dry mass), a slight but statistically significant increase of the earthworms mortality was recorded (12.5% relative to the control). It should be noted that mortality (including missing worms) was observed only in two of the four replicates and consequently, these results should be considered cautiously. No other adverse effects were observed.
The mean fresh body weight of the adult worms increased in the control (101.8%) and in all test concentrations (between 101.6 and 112.2%, depending on the test item concentration). These increases correspond to variations of -0.2% to 10.2% relative to the control condition (depending on the test item concentration). No statistically significant effect of the test item was observed on the growth of the adult earthworms whatever the test item concentration.


 


Table 6 (4): Mass of adults and changes in the body weight between the beginning and the end of the 28 days exposure period.















































































































































































































































































































































































































































 



 



Day 0



Day 28



Changes in body weight
(% of initial weight)



Nominal test item concentrations
(mg/kg dry mass)



Earthworms total body weight
(mg)



Number of surviving earthworms



Earthworms total body weight
(mg)



Mean body weight / earthworm
(mg)



Control



1



4 046



10



7 701



770.1



90.3



2



3 880



10



7 492



749.2



93.1



3



3 601



10



7 050



705.0



95.8



4



3 455



10



7 746



774.6



124.2



5



3 874



10



7 578



757.8



95.6



6



3 649



10



7 445



744.5



104.0



7



3 720



10



7 178



717.8



93.0



8



3 415



10



7 467



746.7



118.7



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 705.0


205.0



10


/



7 457.1


224.3



745.7


22.4



101.8


12.0



29.8



1



4 029



10



8 316



831.6



106.4



2



3 717



9



6 619



735.4



97.9



3



3 582



10



8 022



802.2



124.0



4



3 759



10



7 537



753.7



100.5



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 771.8


162.3



9.75


/



7 623.5


643.2



780.7


38.2



107.2


10.2



47.7



1



3 600



10



7 517



751.7



108.8



2



3 609



10



7 685



768.5



112.9



3



3 866



10



8 099



809.9



109.5



4



3 552



10



7 733



773.3



117.7



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 656.8


122.7



10


/



7 758.5


212.3



775.9


21.2



112.2


3.5



76.3



1



3 838



10



7 839



783.9



104.2



2



3 777



10



7 560



756.0



100.2



3



3 733



10



7 169



716.9



92.0



4



3 723



10



7 861



786.1



111.1



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 767.8


45.4



10


/



7 607.3


279.5



760.7


27.9



101.9


6.9



122.1



1



3 635



10



7 743



774.3



113.0



2



3 841



10



7 834



783.4



104.0



3



3 842



10



7 981



798.1



107.7



4



3 633



10



7 374



737.4



103.0



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 737.8


103.8



10


/



7 733.0


224.0



773.3


22.4



106.9


3.9



195.3



1



3 793



10



7 459



745.9



96.7



2



3 894



10



7 351



735.1



88.8



3



3 691



10



8 001



800.1



116.8



4



3 421



10



7 384



738.4



115.8



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 699.8


176.2



10


/



7 548.8


264.0



754.9


26.4



104.5


12.1



312.5



1



3 856



10



7 332



733.2



90.1



2



3 747



10



7 868



786.8



110.0



3



3 872



10



7 856



785.6



102.9



4



3 603



10



7 548



754.8



109.5



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 769.5


107.5



10


/



7 651.0


224.4



765.1


22.4



103.1


8.0



500.0



1



3 611



10



7 334



733.4



103.1



2



3 907



10



7 843



784.3



100.7



3



3 611



10



7 650



765.0



111.9



4



3 486



10



7 688



768.8



120.5



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 653.8


154.9



10


/



7 628.8


184.9



762.9


18.5



109.1


7.8



800.0



1



3 987



10



7 459



745.9



87.1



2



3 692



7



5 098



728.3



97.3



3



3 441



8



5 773



721.6



109.7



4



3 506



10



7 443



744.3



112.3



Mean


SD (s)



 



3 656.5


211.9



8.8*


/



6 443.3


1035.6



735.0


10.4



101.6


10.1



*Results statistically significant (one-way ANOVA (p-value < 0.05) followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p-value < 0.05)), Toxstat 3.5, Western Inc. and D. Gulley, University of Wyoming.


 


4 - REPRODUCTIVE OUTPUT
The total number of living offspring produced by adults is shown in Table 7. In the control, an average of 106.3 juveniles (SD = 28.6) per test vessels was recorded. Results obtained after exposure to the test item didn’t show any concentration-effect relationship. Except for the treatment at 312 mg/kg (dry soil), the reproduction was always lower by comparison with the control (ranged from -15.1% to -38.4% relative to the control).
However, according to the statistical analyses (one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p value < 0.05)), these differences are not significant.



Table 7: Number of juveniles per test vessel and variation of reproductive output in test item concentrations






































































































































































































































































Nominal test item concentrations
(mg/kg dry mass)



Number of juveniles



CV (%)



Variation of reproductive output (%)



Control



1



162



26.9



/



2



116



3



121



4



70



5



88



6



105



7



118



8



70



Mean


SD (s)



 



106.3


28.6



 



29.8



1



71



18.8



-38.4



2



82



3



49



4



60



Mean


SD (s)



 



65.5


12.3



 



 



47.7



1



93



18.6



-30.1



2



54



3



74



4



76



Mean


SD (s)



 



74.3


13.8



 



 



76.3



1



90



15.9



-15.1



2



100



3



104



4



67



Mean


SD (s)



 



90.3


14.4



 



 



122.1



1



51



35.2



-23.1



2



110



3



111



4



55



Mean


SD (s)



 



81.8


28.8



 



 



195.3



1



94



11.1



-16



2



103



3



78



4



82



Mean


SD (s)



 



89.3


9.9



 



 



312.5



1



134



32.5



9.4



2



52



3



149



4



130



Mean


SD (s)



 



116.3


37.8



 



 



500.0



1



90



25.7



-36.2



2



76



3



62



4



43



Mean


SD (s)



 



67.8


17.4



 



 



800.0



1



113



39.4



-36.5



2



59



3



49



4



49



Mean


SD (s)



 



67.5


26.6



 



 



 


 


 



Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
In control conditions: Each replicate produced more than 30 juveniles by the end of the test, the coefficient of variation was lower than 30% (26.9%) and the adult mortality over the initial 4 weeks didn't exceed 10 % ( 0%)
Conclusions:
Effect of the test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside” on earthworm reproduction was assessed by testing eight concentrations: 29.8 – 47.7 – 76.3 – 122.1 – 195.3 – 312.5 – 500.0 – 800.0 mg/kg.
The results obtained (summarised in Table 8) have shown a decrease of the reproduction when the worms were exposed to the test item, but no concentration-effect relationship was determined. Moreover, according to the statistical analyses (one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p value < 0.05)), these differences in worms reproduction cannot be considered as significant. Taking altogether the mortality, the growth and the reproduction of the exposed worms, the highest concentration of the test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside” without statistically significant inhibitory effect on Eisenia fetida was determined to be, at least, 500 mg/kg of soil (dry mass). At 800 mg/kg of soil (dry mass), a statistically slight increase of the worms mortality was observed (12.5% relative to the control), while no effect on worms growth and reproduction was reported. However, this increase in worms mortality should be considered cautiously as missing worms were observed only for tow of the four test vessel replicates.
According to these results the NOEC value for worms mortality is therefore 500 mg/kg (dry mass) and the NOEC value for worms reproduction is 800 mg/kg (dry mass), the highest tested concentration.
Executive summary:

TEST PURPOSE


Determination of the effect of the test item "Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside" on the reproductive output of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. The test was carried out according to the procedure described in the OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals n°222 "Earthworm Reproduction test", in conformity with the clauses recommended in the study plan of October 28th 2014, signed by the sponsor on November 6th 2014 and the study plan amendment of December 08th 2014, signed by the sponsor on December 11th 2014, signed by the sponsor on December 11th 2014.


 


GUIDELINE


OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals n°222 "Earthworm Reproduction test" (Adopted April 13th 2014).


 


TEST SYSTEM


Eisenia fetida


 


TEST ITEM


"Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside"


 


TEST CONCENTRATION


Nominal concentrations: 29.8 - 47.7 - 76.3 - 122.1 - 195.3 - 312.5 - 500.0 - 800.0 mg/kg of soil (dry mass)


 


DURATION


56 days


 


RESULTS


Effects on earthworms exposed to the test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside”are summarised in Table 1 and Table 2.


After 4 weeks of exposure, no statistically significant increase of the worm mortality was recorded up to 500 mg/kg of soil (dry mass).


At 800 mg/kg of soil (dry mass) a mortality of 12.5% relative to the control was observed. According to the statistical analyses (one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p value < 0.05)), this slight increase of the mortality was found to be significant. However, this result should be considered cautiously as missing worms were observed only for two of the four test vessel replicates.


Whatever the concentration tested, the increase of the fresh body weight was similar to the control group and no statistically significant inhibition was observed. The variation of the body fresh weight compared to the control ranged from -0.2 to 10.2%.


Concerning the reproduction, results obtained after exposure to the test item didn’t show any concentration-effect relationship. Except for the treatment at 312.5 mg/kg (dry soil), the reproduction was always lower by comparison with the control (ranged from -15.1% to -38.4% relative to the control). However, according to the statistical analyses (one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p value < 0.05)), these differences are not significant.


Taking altogether the mortality, the growth and the reproduction of the exposed worms, the highest concentration of the test item“Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside”without statistically significant inhibitory effect onEisenia fetida was determined to be, at least, 500 mg/kg of soil (dry mass). According to these results, the NOEC value for mortality is therefore 500 mg/kg (dry mass) and the NOEC value for reproduction is 800 mg/kg (dry mass), highest tested concentration.


Concerning the test with reference item (Table 2), statistically significant inhibition of the growth and the reproduction were observed for the organisms exposed to the reference item at 3.0 mg.kg of soil (dry mass).


 


Table 1: Effects on earthworms exposed to the test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside”





















































































Parameters



Control



Test item


(mg/kg dry mass)



29.8



47.7



76.3



122.1



195.3



312.5



500



800



Mortality after 4 weeks exposure



0.0%



2.5%



0.0%



0.0%



0.0%



0.0%



0.0%



0.0%



12.5%*



Mean increase of body fresh weight after 4 weeks exposure



101.8%



107.2%



112.2%



101.9%



106.9%



104.5%



103.1%



109.1%



101.6%



Variation of body weight
(compared to control)



/



5.3%



10.2%



0.1%



5.0%



2.6%



1.3%



7.1%



-0.2%



Reproductive output (juveniles per replicate)



106.3



65.5



74.3



90.3



81.8



89.3



116.3



67.8



67.5



Variation of reproductive output
(compared to control)



/



-38.4%



-30.1%



-15.1%



-23.1%



-16%



9.4%



-36.2%



-36.5%



*Results statistically significant (one-way ANOVA (p-value < 0.05) followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p-value < 0.05)), Toxstat 3.5, Western Inc. and D. Gulley, University of Wyoming.


 



Table 2: Effects on earthworms exposed to the reference substance (Benomyl)












































ParametersSolvent controlReference Item
13
Mortality after 4 weeks exposure0.0%0.0%0.0%
Mean increase of body fresh weight after 4 weeks exposure88.4%94.0%19.7%*
Variation of body weight (compared to control)/7.4%-77.8%
Reproductive output (juveniles per replicate)90.570.00.0*
Variation of reproductive output (compared to control)/-22.7%-100.0%*

 


Description of key information

Effect of the test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside” on earthworm reproduction was assessed by testing eight concentrations: 29.8 – 47.7 – 76.3 – 122.1 – 195.3 – 312.5 – 500.0 – 800.0 mg/kg.
The results obtained (summarised in Table 8) have shown a decrease of the reproduction when the worms were exposed to the test item, but no concentration-effect relationship was determined. Moreover, according to the statistical analyses (one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc t-test (p value < 0.05)), these differences in worms reproduction cannot be considered as significant. Taking altogether the mortality, the growth and the reproduction of the exposed worms, the highest concentration of the test item “Reaction mass of 2 ethylhexyl mono D-glucopyranoside, 2-ethylhexyl di-D-glucopyranoside” without statistically significant inhibitory effect on Eisenia fetida was determined to be, at least, 500 mg/kg of soil (dry mass). At 800 mg/kg of soil (dry mass), a statistically slight increase of the worms mortality was observed (12.5% relative to the control), while no effect on worms growth and reproduction was reported. However, this increase in worms mortality should be considered cautiously as missing worms were observed only for tow of the four test vessel replicates.
According to these results the NOEC value for worms mortality is therefore 500 mg/kg (dry mass) and the NOEC value for worms reproduction is 800 mg/kg (dry mass), the highest tested concentration.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil macroorganisms:
500 mg/kg soil dw

Additional information