Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water: screening tests

Administrative data

Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1995-02-02 to 1995-08-29
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: OECD study under GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995
Report date:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 301 D (Ready Biodegradability: Closed Bottle Test)
Version / remarks:
92/69/EWG, C.4-E (Geschl. Flasch.)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): PD 132408 / BIBEA
- Physical state: White Powder
- Analytical purity: 98.25%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not mentioned in the test report
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: not mentioned in the test report
- Lot/batch No.: 409226
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 1995-07-31
- Storage condition of test material: in darkness at room temperature

Study design

Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Inoculum or test system:
activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
Details on inoculum:
- Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): Anglian wter sewage treatment plant, Godmanchester, Great Britain
- Method of cultivation: A sample of activated sludge was collected from the sewage treatment farm on 2 February 1995. The sample wass allowed to settle for approximately 30 minites and the supernatant filtered through Whatman GFA coarse filter paper (first 250 ml discharged).
- Storage conditions: The filtrate was maintained under aeration and used within 24 hours of collection
- Storage length: 24 h at a maximum
- Water filtered: yes
- Type and size of filter used, if any: Whatman GFA coarse filter paper
Duration of test (contact time):
28 d
Initial test substance concentration
Initial conc.:
2 mg/L
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
O2 consumption
Details on study design:
TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: KH2PO4 8.5 mg/l, K2HPO4 21.75 mg/l, Na2HPO4.2H2O 33.4 mg/l, NH4Cl 0.5 mg/l, MgSo4.7H2o 22.5 mg/l, CaCl2 27.5 mg/l, FeCl3.6H2O 0.25 mg/l
- Test temperature: 20 +/- 1°C
- pH: not given
- pH adjusted: no

CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: yes
- Abiotic sterile control: yes
Reference substance
Reference substance:
benzoic acid, sodium salt

Results and discussion

% Degradation
Value:
36
Sampling time:
28 d
Details on results:
Points of degradation plot (test substance):
36 % degradation after 4 d
31 % degradation after 7 d
31 % degradation after 11 d
36 % degradation after 14 d
33 % degradation after 18 d
32 % degradation after 21 d
32 % degradation after 25 d
31 % degradation after 28 d

BOD5 / COD results

Results with reference substance:
Points of degradation plot (reference substance):
64 % degradation after 4 d
72 % degradation after 7 d
71 % degradation after 11 d
79 % degradation after 14 d
73 % degradation after 18 d
79 % degradation after 21 d
80 % degradation after 25 d
79 % degradation after 28 d

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Interpretation of results:
other:
Conclusions:
BIBEA is not redily biodegradable.
Executive summary:

In a OECD 301D Closed Bottle test BIBEA was shown to be not readily biodegradable with a degradation of 36% after 28 days. The 10 days window was not passed. The positive control worked as expected.