Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 243-717-6 | CAS number: 20298-05-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
The reproductive toxicity of trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)was estimated by SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3with log kow as the primary descriptor and NOAEL was estimated to be 1013.125mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed withtrisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)orally.
Thus, based on the above predictions and experimental study trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)and its structurally similar read across substance No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be between 500mg/kg bw to 1500mg/kg bw . Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3, 2017
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- No data available
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (IUPAC name): trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate
- Molecular formula: C22H17N4Na3O13S4
- Molecular weight: 742.6253 g/mol
-InChl:1S/C22H20N4O13S4.3Na/c1-13-20(22(27)26(25-13)14-5-7-15(8-6-14)40(28,29)12-11-39-43(36,37)38)24-23-18-10-9-16-17(21(18)42(33,34)35)3-2-4-19(16)41(30,31)32;;;/h2-10,20H,11-12H2,1H3,(H,30,31,32)(H,33,34,35)(H,36,37,38);;;/q;3*+1/p-3/b24-23+;;;
- Substance type: Organic - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data available
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on exposure:
- No data available
- Details on mating procedure:
- No data available
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- F0-males:
- for 2 weeks prior to mating, throughout mating and after mating at least until the minimum total dosing period of 28 days had been completed
F0-females:
2 weeks prior to mating, throughout mating, and pregnancy and at least up to, and including the day before sacrifice - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Details on study schedule:
- No data available
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 013.125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Positive control:
- No data available
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule:
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule:
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes / No / No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
OTHER: - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- No data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- No data available
- Litter observations:
- No data available
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- No data available SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. as soon as possible after the last litters in each generation were produced.]
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. after the last litter of each generation was weaned.]
GROSS NECROPSY: yes
- Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.]
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS: yes
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Reproductive indices:
- No data available
- Offspring viability indices:
- No data available
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 013.125 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects on reproductive performance was observed
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 013.125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
- Remarks on result:
- other: No developmental toxic effects was observed
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In reproductive toxicity study, NOAEL was estimated to be 1013.125mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed with trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9) orally.
- Executive summary:
The reproductive toxicity of trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)was estimated by SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3with log kow as the primary descriptor and NOAEL was estimated to be 1013.125mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed withtrisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)orally
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: NOAEL
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 8 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" )
and ("f"
and (
not "g")
)
)
and ("h"
and (
not "i")
)
)
and ("j"
and (
not "k")
)
)
and ("l"
and (
not "m")
)
)
and ("n"
and (
not "o")
)
)
and ("p"
and (
not "q")
)
)
and ("r"
and (
not "s")
)
)
and ("t"
and "u" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Naphthalene sulfonic acids,
condensates by OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Vinyl Sulfones by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion
formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >>
Nitrenium Ion formation >> Unsaturated heterocyclic azo by DNA binding
by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Schiff base formation OR Schiff
base formation >> Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones derivatives OR Schiff
base formation >> Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones derivatives >>
Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3 ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct
Acylation Involving a Leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct Acylation
Involving a Leaving group >> Acetates OR SN2 OR SN2 >> SN2 reaction at
sp3 carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 reaction at sp3 carbon atom >> Alkyl diazo
by Protein binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Michael-type
addition on alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds OR AN2 >>
Michael-type addition on alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds >>
Four- and Five-Membered Lactones OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation after
aldehyde release OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation after aldehyde release
>> Specific Acetate Esters OR Non-covalent interaction OR Non-covalent
interaction >> DNA intercalation OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA
intercalation >> DNA Intercalators with Carboxamide Side Chain OR
Non-specific OR Non-specific >> Incorporation into DNA/RNA, due to
structural analogy with nucleoside bases OR Non-specific >>
Incorporation into DNA/RNA, due to structural analogy with nucleoside
bases >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR Radical OR Radical
>> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical
mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitroarenes with Other Active
Groups OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >>
Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Alkylation after
metabolically formed carbenium ion species OR SN1 >> Alkylation after
metabolically formed carbenium ion species >> Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbon Derivatives OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium
ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium ion
formation >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after
diazonium or carbenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after
diazonium or carbenium ion formation >> Nitroarenes with Other Active
Groups OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion
formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium
ion formation >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups OR SN1 >>
Nucleophilic substitution on diazonium ions OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
substitution on diazonium ions >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives
OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Acylation OR SN2 >> Acylation >> Specific Acetate
Esters OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related after
P450-mediated metabolic activation OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting
epoxides and related after P450-mediated metabolic activation >>
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives OR SN2 >> Alkylation, ring
opening SN2 reaction OR SN2 >> Alkylation, ring opening SN2 reaction >>
Four- and Five-Membered Lactones OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at
sp3 Carbon atom OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 Carbon atom
>> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN2 >> SN2 attack on activated carbon Csp3
or Csp2 OR SN2 >> SN2 attack on activated carbon Csp3 or Csp2 >>
Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, MW>500 by Estrogen
Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2
group OR Non binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Strong binder, OH group
by Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Anion AND Aromatic compound AND
Carbonic acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid derivative AND Cation AND
Heterocyclic compound AND Sulfonic acid derivative AND Sulfuric acid
derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acetal by Organic functional
groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Anion AND Aromatic compound AND
Carbonic acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid derivative AND Cation AND
Heterocyclic compound AND Sulfonic acid derivative AND Sulfuric acid
derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Tertiary aliphatic amine by
Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Carbon [CH] AND
Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH3] AND Aliphatic
Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] AND Amide, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)N]
AND Amino, aliphatic attach [-N<] AND Amino-carbonyl compound
[NCC(=O)-C] AND Aromatic Carbon [C] AND Azo [-N=N-] AND Azomethine,
aliphatic attach [-N=C] AND Carbonyl, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)-] AND
Hydrazine [>N-N<] AND Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) AND
Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or
=C<] AND Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} AND Sulfate, linear [-O-SO2-O-] AND
Sulfite, linear [-OS(=O)O-] AND Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by
Organic functional groups (US EPA)
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH]
by Organic functional groups (US EPA)
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aryl AND Azo AND Fused
carbocyclic aromatic AND Naphtalene AND Pyrazolone AND Sulfate AND
Sulfone AND Sulfonic acid AND Unsaturated heterocyclic amine AND
Unsaturated heterocyclic fragment by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Ether by Organic Functional
groups
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aryl AND Azo AND Fused
carbocyclic aromatic AND Naphtalene AND Pyrazolone AND Sulfate AND
Sulfone AND Sulfonic acid AND Unsaturated heterocyclic amine AND
Unsaturated heterocyclic fragment by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Carboxylic acid ester by Organic
Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "t"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is >= 623
Da
Domain
logical expression index: "u"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is <= 879
Da
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 013.125 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimicsh 2 and from QSAR Toolbox 3.3. (2017)
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Reproductive toxicity
In different studies on trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)has been investigated for reproductive toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies performed on structurally similar read across substance.
The reproductive toxicity of trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)was estimated by SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3with log kow as the primary descriptor and NOAEL was estimated to be 1013.125mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed with trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)orally.
Further supported by experimental study conducted byThe Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)(Brilliant Black PN: Toxicological Evaluation of certain food additives (WHO Food additives Series 16- 1981)) on structurally similar read across substance with Brilliant Black PN (2519-30-4). A multigeneration reproductive toxicity study of Brilliant Black PN (2519-30-4) was performed on male and female wistar rats. The test material mixed with feed in dose concentration 0, 0.1, 1.0 or 3% (0, 50, 500, 1500 mg/kg bw per day) and administered orally for three successive generations. Each generation having 60 animals of each sex in the control and 40 animals of each sex in test animals. No adverse effects were observed with respect to fertility, litter size and weight, general condition, male/female ratio, growth during lactation, survival or maturation. Autopsy of parent rats and pups at weaning did not reveal any treatment related changes in organ weights other than caecal enlargement in the 3% dose group. Gross and microscopic examination of the F3 generation at weaning did not reveal any abnormalities due to treatment and no adverse effects were seen in the teratology study. It was concluded that Brilliant Black PN did not exert any adverse effects on reproductive function of Wistar rats when fed at dietary levels up to 3% (1500 mg/kg bw per day) for three successive generations. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be at 3% (1500 mg/kg bw per day) for F0 F1 and F2 generation .When male and female wistar rats were treated with Brilliant Black PN (2519-30-4) orally.
Also in another experimental study conducted byU.S. National Library of Medicine(HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank); US national Library of Medicine reviewed by SRC, 2017.)on structurally similar read across substance with 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, disodium salt (2783-94-0).Three generation reproductive study of 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, disodium salt (2783-94-0) was performed on male and female Charles River CD rats. Animals were housed individually and fed the test diet ad libitum. The test material mixed with food in dose concentration 0, 5, 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg bw/day and 10 males and 20 females/group/generation were used .Pre-Mating Exposure / Males and Females were 60 days. Clinical observations were recorded twice daily with at least 5 hours between observations. Detailed physical examinations and palpation for masses were performed weekly. Body weights and food consumption were determined weekly for the first fourteen weeks, bi-weekly for the next 12 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter until the end of the study. The intake of the test substance was determined from body weight, food consumption and dietary concentration. Haematology tests, including haemoglobin, haematocrit, erythrocyte and total and differential leukocyte counts, and erythrocyte morphology, were conducted on ten randomly selected animals at months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 of the study. Necropsies were conducted on all animals dying prior to study termination, killed in a moribund condition or killed on schedule. Histological examinations were conducted on all animals from both control groups, the highest dose group (2.0 or 5.0%) from each study and also on 10 rats randomly selected from each group for an interim sacrifice at 12 months. Histology was also performed on any animal with gross lesions or masses. Also tissues examined included adrenal glands, aorta, blood smear, brain, cecum, colon, duodenum, epididymus or uterus, esophagus, eyes, femur including marrow, tissue masses, gallbladder, heart, ileum, jejunum, duodenum, kidneys, liver, lungs and bronchi, mammary gland, nerves (sciatic), ovaries, lymph nodes, pancreas, parathyroids, pituitary gland, prostrate, rectum, skin, spleen, seminal vesicles, skeletal muscle, testes with epididymides, stomach, thymus, thyroid gland including parathyroid, trachea, urinary bladder, uterus.
At the end of study, no treatment-related effects were reported on survival. No treatment-related changes were reported at gross necropsy. Histological evaluation revealed a variety of lesions, including neoplasms, present at similar incidences in control and treated animals. The authors considered the lesions to be spontaneous and not related to administration of the test material. There were no compound related effects on fertility, gestation, pup viability or lactation indices, on reproductive organs of females, or on organ weights among parents and offspring. There were no compound related lesions in any tissue examined histologically, including kidneys and adrenal glands from parental rats or from offspring. There was no toxicity to either the F1 or F2 generation. Food consumption was similar for control and treated animals at the lower dietary levels, but was slightly higher in the high-dose study, although not statistically significant. Haematological, clinical chemistry and urinalysis parameters did not differ significantly from the controls. Necropsies at one year did not reveal any treatment-related gross or microscopic changes. Hence NOAEL was considered to be 500mg/kg bw/day for F0, F1 and F2 generation. When male and female Charles River CD rats were treated with 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, disodium salt (2783-94-0) orally.
Thus, based on the above predictions and experimental study trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)and its structurally similar read across substance No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be between 500mg/kg bw to 1500mg/kg bw . Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation trisodium 2-[(E)-2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-{4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (20298-05-9)cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.