Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to fish

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
fish early-life stage toxicity
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
According to the communication number CCH-D-2114328744-46-01/F, and according to ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (version 3.0, February 2016), Chapter R7b (Section R.7.8.5., including Figure R.7.8-4), if based on acute aquatic toxicity data neither fish nor invertebrates are shown to be substantially more sensitive, long-term studies may be required on both. In such case, according to the integrated testing strategy, the Daphnia study is to be conducted first. If based on the results of the long-term Daphnia study and the application of a relevant assessment factor, no risks are observed (PEC/PNEC<1), no long-term fish testing may need to be conducted. However, if a risk is indicated, the long-term fish study needs to be conducted.

The long-term Daphnia test concluded that the Test item did not affect the reproduction of Daphnia magna at a loading rate of 1.0 mg a.i./L after 21 days of exposure (saturation concentration), being the NOAEL equal to 1.0 mg a.i./L and EL50 greater than 1.0 mg a.i./L. Based on these results, the substance is not classified for aquatic toxicity according to CLP Regulation and no risk assessment is necessary to be performed according to REACH Regulation. Therefore, it is concluded that the long-term fish testing is not scientifically justified.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information

Description of key information

Data waiving (study scientifically not necessary): According to the communication number CCH-D-2114328744-46-01/F, and according to ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (version 3.0, February 2016), Chapter R7b (Section R.7.8.5., including Figure R.7.8-4), if based on acute aquatic toxicity data neither fish nor invertebrates are shown to be substantially more sensitive, long-term studies may be required on both. In such case, according to the integrated testing strategy, the Daphnia study is to be conducted first. If based on the results of the long-term Daphnia study and the application of a relevant assessment factor, no risks are observed (PEC/PNEC<1), no long-term fish testing may need to be conducted. However, if a risk is indicated, the long-term fish study needs to be conducted.

The long-term Daphnia test concluded that the Test item did not affect the reproduction of Daphnia magna at a loading rate of 1.0 mg a.i./L after 21 days of exposure (saturation concentration), being the NOAEL equal to 1.0 mg a.i./L and EL50 greater than 1.0 mg a.i./L. Based on these results, the substance is not classified for aquatic toxicity according to CLP Regulation and  no risk assessment is necessary to be performed according to REACH Regulation. Therefore, it is concluded that the long-term fish testing is not scientifically justified.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information