Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-365-5 | CAS number: -
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
The investigation is classified as invalid based on present assessment criteria. Consequently, the studies cannot be used for the assessment of the carcinogenicity of the test substance.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- other: both rat and mice
- Quality of whole database:
- The investigation is classified as invalid based on present assessment criteria. Consequently, the studies cannot be used for the assessment of the carcinogenicity of the test substance
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The studies reported by Pliss, et al. are insufficient for assessment due to data availability and inappropriate study design.
Inconclusive: No classification required
Additional information
In the studies reported by Pliss, doses of 60 and 10 mg/animal/week were given subcutaneously, and doses of 30 and 5 mg/animal 6 days/week the test item were administered orally in the diet to rats and mice, respectively. More than 50 % of the test animals died during the course of the study (23 to 24 months in rats and 12 to 16.5 months in mice studies). Some of the surviving rats developed tumors after 16 and 19 months. No control group was tested in parallel to evaluate the rate of spontaneous tumor development. No data is documented on age, sex and weight of the animals. No description of the type, significance and proliferation of the tumors is given. Especially no clear-cut differentiation is made between the development of chronic lipoid nephropathia in the kidney glomerula (fat type deposits) or pigment type deposits in the tubules of the kidney (probably resulting from the high dyestuff doses used) and the alleged tumors. The investigation is classified as invalid based on present assessment criteria. Consequently, the studies cannot be used for the assessment of the carcinogenicity of the test substance
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route
endpoint:
All studies to be considered invalid for assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
