Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
17 Aug 2018 - 26 Sep 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2006, Annex 5 corrected 2011
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Guidance document on aquatic toxicity testing of difficult substances and mixtures, OECD series on testing and assessment number 23
Version / remarks:
2000
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Indene
EC Number:
202-393-6
EC Name:
Indene
Cas Number:
95-13-6
Molecular formula:
C9H8
IUPAC Name:
indene
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Appereance: Colorless transparent liquid
Storage conditions: At room temperature container flushed with nitrogen

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: all test concentrations and the control
- Sampling method: 2.0 mL from the approximate centre of the test vessels at t=0 h, t=24 h and t=72 h.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: The test samples were diluted in a 1:1 (v:v) ratio with acetonitrile and stored in the freezer (≤ -15°C) until analysis at the analytical laboratory of the Test Facility.
- At the end of the exposure period, the replicates with algae were not pooled at each concentration before sampling due to the volatility of the test item. Instead, samples were taken from one replicate per treatment group.
- Compliance with the quality criteria regarding maintenance of actual concentrations was checked by running a test vessel at 4.6% of the SS but without algae and samples for analysis were taken at the start, after 24 hours of exposure and at the end of the test period.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- The batch of the test item was a colorless transparent liquid with a purity of 96.6% which was not completely soluble in test medium at the loading rate initially prepared. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item. All glassware used during the preparation of test solutions was closed with minimal headspace to minimize vaporization of test item.
- Preparation of test solutions started with a loading rate of 100 mg/L applying a three-day period of magnetic stirring to ensure maximum dissolution of the test item in medium. The obtained mixture was allowed to settle for a period of one hour. Thereafter, the aqueous Saturated Solution (SS) was collected by means of siphoning and used as the highest test concentration. Lower test concentrations were prepared by subsequent dilutions of the SS in test medium. All test solutions were clear and colorless at the end of the preparation procedure.
- After preparation, volumes of 40 mL were added to each replicate of the respective test concentration. Subsequently, 0.8 mL of an algal suspension was added to each replicate providing a cell density of 10^4 cells/mL.
- Controls: Test medium without test item or other additives.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
- Strain: NIVA CHL 1
- Source: In-house laboratory culture
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 3 days
- Method of cultivation: Algae stock cultures were started by inoculating growth medium with algal cells from a pure culture on agar. The suspensions were continuously aerated and exposed to light in a climate room at a temperature of 21-24°C.
- Pre-culture: Three days before the start of the test, cells from the algal stock culture were inoculated in culture medium at a cell density of 1 x 10^4 cells/mL. The pre-culture was maintained under the same conditions as used in the test. The cell density was measured immediately before use.
- Stock culture medium: M1, according to NPR 6505 (“Nederlandse Praktijk Richtlijn no. 6505”), formulated using tap-water purified by reverse osmosis.
- Pre-culture medium and test medium: Adjusted M2, according to OECD 201, formulated using tap-water purified by reverse osmosis.

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h

Test conditions

Hardness:
0.24 mmol/L (24 mg CaCO3/L)
Test temperature:
21.5 - 21.9°C
pH:
At t=0 h: 7.4
At t=72 h: 7.4 - 8.1
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal: 0.46, 1.0, 2.2, 4.6, 10 and 22 % of Saturated Solution prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L
Measured: The measured concentrations at the start of the test were 0.31, 0.76, 1.7, 3.3, 7.9 and 17 mg/L, respectively. During the 72-hour exposure period, the concentrations had decreased to 28-58% of initial. Therefore, Time Weighted Average concentrations were calculated to be 0.24, 0.60, 1.3, 2.8, 5.2 and 14 mg/L respectively. See 'Any other details on materials and methods' for the TWA calculation and 'Any other details on results' for details on measured concentrations.
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 40 mL glass vials, airtight closed with no headspace to prevent any loss of the test item due to volatilization.
- Vessels were distributed at random in the incubator and daily repositioned. During incubation the algal cells were kept in suspension by continuous shaking.
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: 1 x 10^4 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 289 x 10^4 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- 1 extra replicate of each test group for sampling purposes after 24 hours of exposure, 1 or 2 replicates of each test concentration without algae.

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes, Adjusted M2

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Adjusted M2 medium
- Intervals of water quality measurement: pH: at the beginning and at the end of the test, for all concentrations and the control. Temperature of medium: continuously in a temperature control vessel.
- Appearance of the cells: At the end of the final test microscopic observations were performed on the solution containing 10% of the SS to observe for any abnormal appearance of the algae compared to the control.

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: Continuously using TLD-lamps with a light intensity within the range of 70 to 76 µE.m^-2.s^-1

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: At the beginning of the test, cells were counted using a microscope and a counting chamber. Thereafter, cell densities were determined by spectrophotometric measurement of samples at 680 nm using a spectrophotometer with cuvettes (path length =10 mm). Test medium was used as blank and the extra replicates, without algae, as background for the treated solutions.

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study test loading rates: 1.0, 10, 100 % of SS prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes, ErC50 is estimated to be between 1.0 and 10% of SS.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate (performed July 2018)

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
3.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat. (dissolved fraction)
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence interval: 2.4 - 4.4 mg/L
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
4.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat. (dissolved fraction)
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence interval: 3.1 - 5.9 mg/L
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
2.8 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat. (dissolved fraction)
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: Based on biological relevance
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
1.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat. (dissolved fraction)
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: Based on statistical significance
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control: yes
- Observation of abnormalities: Microscopic observations at the end of the test revealed a normal and healthy appearance of the algal cells exposed to a TWA concentration of 5.2 mg/L when compared to the control.
- Statistically significant growth rate inhibition was found at concentrations of 2.8 mg/L and higher, reaching 99% growth rate inhibition at a TWA concentration of 14 mg/L. However, growth rate inhibition recorded at 2.8 mg/L was below 10% and therefore considered to be biologically not relevant. The NOEC for growth rate based on biological relevance was thus set at 2.8 mg/L.
- The concentrations measured in the samples taken from solutions with algae were comparable with the concentrations measured in the samples without algae. Hence, it can be stated that the presence of the algae had no effect on the test item concentrations in test medium throughout the test.
- All water quality parameters remained within the requirements as laid down in the study plan throughout the Final Test.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- EC50 for growth rate inhibition (72h-ErC50) was 0.90 mg/L with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 mg/L. The historical ranges for growth rate inhibition lie between 0.82 and 2.3 mg/L. The observed 72h-ErC50 for the algal culture tested corresponds with this range.
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Statistical significance: Step-down Jonckheere-Terpstra Test, α=0.05, one-sided, smaller.
Calculation of ECx-values for inhibition of growth rates was based on a 3-parameter normal cumulative distribution function (CDF) using non-linear regression analysis with the percentages of growth rate inhibition versus the logarithms of the corresponding TWA concentrations of the test item.
ToxRat Professional v 3.2.1 (ToxRat Solutions® GmbH, Germany) was used to perform the analysis.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Final Test: Test Samples

Time of sampling
[hours]

Percentage of SS (a)
[%]

Analyzed concentration
[mg/L]

Relative to
initial
[%]

0

0

(c)

 

 

0.46

0.310

 

 

1.0

0.759

 

 

2.2

1.69

 

 

4.6

3.34

 

 

4.6 (b)

3.54

 

 

10

7.90

 

 

22

17.0

 

24

0

(c)

n.a.

 

0.46

0.336

108

 

1.0

0.815

107

 

2.2

1.65

98

 

4.6

3.40

102

 

4.6 (b)

3.47

98

 

10

7.34

93

 

22

15.4

91

72

0

(c)

n.a.

 

0.46

0.121

39

 

1.0

0.325

43

 

2.2

0.836

49

 

4.6

1.94

58

 

4.6 (b)

2.29

65

 

10

2.23

28

 

22

9.74

57

(a) Percentage of a saturated solution (SS) prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L.

(b) Without algae.

(c) Peak detected at the retention time of the test item. This was considered to be background noise because of the different peak shape.

n.a. Not applicable.

Table 2: Growth Rate and Percentage Inhibition for the Total Test Period


TWA conc. (mg/L)
 

Mean

Std. Dev.

n

%Inhibition

Control

1.888

0.0067

6

 

0.24

1.891

0.0031

3

-0.12

0.60

1.891

0.0012

3

-0.15

1.3

1.888

0.0060

3

0.029

2.8

1.850

0.0113

3

2.0#

5.2

0.325

0.4450

3

83*

14

0.019

0.0327

3

99*

* Effect was statistically significant,#Effect was statistically significant however biologically not relevant (<10%).

Table 3: Growth Rate and Percentage Inhibition at Different Time Intervals   

TWA conc. (mg/L)

n

0 – 24 h

24 – 48 h

48 – 72h

Mean

%Inhibition

Mean

%Inhibition

Mean

%Inhibition

Control

6

2.537

 

1.750

 

1.379

 

0.24

3

2.475

2.4

1.827

-4.4

1.371

0.59

0.60

3

2.606

-2.7

1.735

0.87

1.333

3.3

1.3

3

2.434

4.1

1.829

-4.5

1.401

-1.6

2.8

3

2.577

-1.6

1.671

4.5

1.303

5.5

5.2

3

1.891

25

0.051

97

-0.966

170

14

3

1.654

35

-0.137

108

-1.460

206



Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
See 'Overall remarks' for details on validity criteria.
Conclusions:
The 72h-ErC10 and ErC50 for growth rate inhibition were 3.3 and 4.3 mg/L based on TWA concentrations. The 72h-NOEC for growth rate inhibition was 1.3 mg/L based on statistical significance and 2.8 mg/L based on biological relevance.
Executive summary:

In a 72 h toxicity study conducted according to OECD guideline 201 and GLP principles, freshwater algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) were exposed to solutions containing 0.46, 1.0, 2.2, 4.6, 10 and 22% of a Saturated Solution of the test item prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L (3 replicates per concentration) and an untreated control (6 replicates). Measured concentrations decreased to 28 -58% of initial at the end of the exposure period, therefore Time Weighted Average concentrations were calculated to be 0.24, 0.60, 1.3, 2.8, 5.2 and 14 mg/L, respectively. A concentration-related increase of growth rate inhibition was observed at concentrations of 2.8 mg/L and higher, reaching 99% growth rate inhibition at at TWA concentration of 14 mg/L. The EC50 for growth rate inhibition (72h-ErC50) and 72h-ErC10 were 4.3 and 3.3 mg/L, respectively. The 72h-NOErC was 1.3 mg/L based on statistical significance and 2.8 mg/L based on biological relevance. The study met all validity criteria, and is considered reliable without restriction.