Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 December 2017 - 16 December 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dipotassium methanedisulphonate
EC Number:
228-543-0
EC Name:
Dipotassium methanedisulphonate
Cas Number:
6291-65-2
Molecular formula:
CH4O6S2.2K
IUPAC Name:
dipotassium methanedisulphonate
Test material form:
solid

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Remarks:
SkinEthic RHE® model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: not specified
Justification for test system used:
This study makes use of reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) (obtained from human derived non-transformed epidermal keratinocytes) which closely mimics the histological, morphological, biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human skin, i.e., the epidermis. Use of reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) is also recommended by OECD and other regulatory authorities. SkinEthicTM RHE model has been validated and is part of OECD validated reference methods (VRMs) and is also a recommended model for conducting in vitro skin irritation studies.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: SkinEthic RHE® model
- Tissue batch number(s): 17-RHE-127
- Production date:
- Shipping date:
- Delivery date:
- Date of initiation of testing: 12/12/2017

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature for 3 min exposure and 37°C ± 1°C for 1 hour exposure.
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37ºC

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: 20 x 1 mL of DPBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: no
- Modifications to validated SOP: no

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1.0 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2
- Spectrophotometer: Synergy™ microplate reader (BioTek)
- Wavelength: 570 nm

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: OD =1.1 (CV = 4.5%) specification OD > 0.7. Historical negative control mean OD range = 1.610-2.594 (3 min exposure) and 1.806-2.693 (60 min exposure) (acceptability criteria, 0.8≤OD≤3).
- Barrier function: 4.5 h (Specification 4.0h < ET50< 10h)
- Morphology: 6 Cell layers, absence of significant histological abnormalities, well differentiated epidermis, specification > 4
- Contamination: no

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE:
- Freeze killed tissues (for positive control)
- Procedure used to prepare the killed tissues (if applicable): Killed tissues were prepared by incubating the viable tissues at -20 ± 5°C for 48 hours.
- N. of replicates : 2
- Method of calculation used: The true tissue viability is calculated as the percent tissue viability obtained with living tissues exposed to the positive minus the percent non-specific MTT reduction obtained with the killed tissues exposed to the same, calculated relative to the negative control run concurrently (%NSMTT). NSMTT was < 0% relative to the negative control, therefore true tissue viability was not determined.

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive to skin if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is less than 50%, or if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50 % and the viability after 1 hour exposure is less than 15%.
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive to skin if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 hour exposure is greater than or equal to 15%.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 20 mg (40 mg/cm2)

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 40 µL

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 40 µL
- Concentration (if solution): N/A
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 minutes and 60 minutes
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
3 hours (incubation in MTT solution)
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
mean after 3 min exposure
Value:
108
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
(distilled water)
Positive controls validity:
not applicable
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
mean after 1 hour exposure
Value:
95
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
(distilled water)
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
5.31% viability (8N KOH)
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
- Direct-MTT reduction: For adapted positive control treated tissues, NSMTT was < 0% relative to the negative control, therefore true MTT metabolic conversion of treated tissue was not determined.
- Colour interference with MTT: no

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: yes. A demonstration of proficiency was performed for the SkinEthic RHE® model. Adequate results were obtained for the evaluated chemicals.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes. The mean OD of negative control tissues for treatment time 3 min and 1 hour were 2.328 and 2.324 (acceptability criteria, 0.8≤OD≤3 for the SkinEthic RHE® model).
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes. Mean viability of the tissue replicates exposed for 1 hour, expressed as % of the negative control, is 5.31% < 15%.
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes. 1.53% (for 3 min exposure) and 1.00% (for 60 min exposure) < 30%.




Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Data Summary of Percent Viability

Treatment

Exposure

Time

Tissue Replicate

O.D.

Corrected O.D.

Mean of Corrected O.D.

Mean O.D. of Replicate tissues

% Viability/

Tissue

Mean % Viability

S.D. of % Viability

% C.V. of % Viability

Corrosivity Class

Negative Control

(Sterile Distilled water)

3 Minutes

1

2.352

2.309

2.294

2.328

100

100

NA

NA

NA

2.331

2.288

2.328

2.285

2

2.411

2.368

2.353

2.434

2.391

2.343

2.3

3

2.329

2.286

2.336

2.433

2.39

2.374

2.331

60 Minutes

1

2.408

2.365

2.306

2.324

100

100

NA

NA

2.324

2.281

2.314

2.271

2

2.335

2.292

2.299

2.332

2.289

2.36

2.317

3

2.447

2.404

2.368

2.342

2.299

2.444

2.401

Positive Control

(8N KOH)

60 Minutes

1

0.172

0.129

0.125

0.123

5.38

5.31

0.07

1.32

Corrosive

0.165

0.122

0.166

0.123

2

0.172

0.129

0.123

5.29

0.167

0.124

0.16

0.117

3

0.15

0.107

0.122

5.25

0.179

0.136

0.167

0.124

Treatment

Exposure

Time

Tissue Replicate

O.D.

Corrected O.D.

Mean of Corrected O.D.

Mean O.D. of Replicate tissues

% Viability/

Tissue

Mean % Viability

S.D. of % Viability

% C.V. of % Viability

Corrosivity Class

Dipotassium Methanedisulphonate

3 Minutes

1

2.636

2.593

2.506

2.522

108

108

1.53

1.42

Non-corrosive

2.499

2.456

2.512

2.469

2

2.572

2.529

2.570

110

2.651

2.608

2.617

2.574

3

2.491

2.448

2.489

107

2.518

2.475

2.588

2.545

60 Minutes

1

2.318

2.275

2.21

2.204

95

95

1.00

1.05

2.199

2.156

2.242

2.199

2

2.381

2.338

2.225

96

2.208

2.165

2.216

2.173

3

2.2

2.157

2.177

94

2.237

2.194

2.224

2.181

Key: O.D. = Optical density, S.D. = Standard deviation, C.V. = Coefficient variation

Note: Mean O.D. of Blank at 03 minutes and 60 minutes exposure was 0.042. Mean ODNC at 3 minutes exposure was 2.328 and Mean ODNC at 60 minutes exposure was 2.324.

Table 2: Data Summary of Adapted Control for Non-Specific MTT Reduction (NSMTT)

Treatment

Exposure Time

Tissue Replicate

O.D.

Corrected O.D.

Mean of Corrected O.D.

Mean OD of Replicate tissues

% NSMTT

Mean % NSMTT

TODTT

% Relative Viability

Negative Control

(Untreated killed tissues)

60 minutes

1

0.17

0.128

0.127

0.129

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.17

0.128

0.168

0.126

2

0.175

0.133

0.130

0.168

0.126

0.172

0.13

Positive Control

(Positive control treated killed tissues)

60 minutes

1

0.046

0.004

0.005

0.005

-5.0

-5.0

NA

NA

0.047

0.005

0.047

0.005

2

0.046

0.004

0.004

-5.0

0.045

0.003

0.046

0.004

Keys: O.D. = Optical Density, NSMTT = Non-specific MTT reduction calculation, NA = Not applicable, TODTT = Treated tissue true metabolic conversion,

Note: 1) For positive control (exposure period of 60 minutes) and Dipotassium Methanedisulphonate  (exposure period of 03 and 60 minutes), NSMTT was < 0% relative to the negative control, hence true MTT metabolic conversion of treated tissue was not determined; 2) Mean O.D. Blank was 0.042;  3) Mean ODNC for 60 minutes exposure was 2.324 and mean ODNC for 03 minutes exposure was 2.328; 4) Distilled water was used for Negative control tissues and 8N KOH was used for positive control tissues

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: No category (CLP Regulation EC no. 1272/2008)
Conclusions:
Under RHE test method performed in SkinEthic RHE® model the test item does not have to be classified as skin corrosive (cat. 1).
Executive summary:

An in vitro skin corrosion test for the test item was performed in a reconstructed human epidermis SkinEthic RHE® model, according to OECD TG 431 (GLP study). Three epidermis units were treated with 20 mg test item for 3 minutes at room temperature and for 1 hour, at 37°C, 5% CO2. Exposure of the test item was terminated by rinsing with 20 x 1 mL of DPBS. The viability of each disk was assessed by incubating the tissues with MTT, extracting the precipitated formazan crystals using isopropanol and incubating the tissues for overnight in a refrigerator protected from light, and finally measuring the concentration of formazan by determining the OD at 570 nm. Under the test conditions, the mean percent viabilities of the treated tissues were 108% (for 3 min exposure) and 95% (for 60 min exposure) versus 5.31% (for 60 min exposure) of the positive control item (potassium hydroxide 8N). Therefore, the test item must be considered as non-corrosive.