Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
16th Nov - 25th Dec 1998
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study was conducted prior to the introduction of in-vitro and LLNA studies

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
429-080-9
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
198904-85-7
Molecular formula:
C17 H21 N3 O2
IUPAC Name:
Tert-butyl 2-[4-(2-pyridinyl) phenylmethyl] hydrazine carboxylate
Test material form:
solid: bulk
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identity of test material same as for substance defined in section 1

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Key result
Reading:
rechallenge
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50%
No. with + reactions:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximium concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 5%

Signs of irritation during induction: Very slight to well defined erythema was apparent at the injection sites of both test and control animals. Following topical exposure, most sites in the control and treated animals exhibited either very slight or well-defined erythema, with very slight oedema noted in some animals.

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration: There were no signs of reaction in any of the treated or control animals. 50% was considered to be the highest practical concentration possible to administer.

Other observations: One control animal was put down on day 16 having shown respiratory problems. No cause, but was considered not to be treatment related.

No other significant observations other than the dermal effects.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not classifed
Conclusions:
The test material produced a 0% sensitisation rate to guinea pig skin.