Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
7-[2-(2-hydroxymethylethoxy)methylethoxy]tetramethyl-3,6,8,11-tetraoxa-7-phosphatridecane-1,13-diol
EC Number:
253-211-7
EC Name:
7-[2-(2-hydroxymethylethoxy)methylethoxy]tetramethyl-3,6,8,11-tetraoxa-7-phosphatridecane-1,13-diol
Cas Number:
36788-39-3
Molecular formula:
C18H39O9P
IUPAC Name:
7-[2-(2-hydroxymethylethoxy)methylethoxy]tetramethyl-3,6,8,11-tetraoxa-7-phosphatridecane-1,13-diol
Test material form:
liquid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Animals:20 females (nulliparous and non-pregnant), five females per group. Young adult animals (approx. 8 weeks old) were selected. Body weight variation was within +/- 20% of the sex mean.Conditions:Environmental controls for the animal room were set to maintain 18 to 24°C, a relative humidity of 40 to 70%, approximately 15 room air changes/hour, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. Any variations to these conditions were maintained in the raw data and had no effect on the outcome of the study. AccommodationAnimals were group housed in labeled Makrolon cages (MIII type; height 18 cm) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France). Paper (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom) and shelters (disposable paper corner home, MCORN 404, Datesand Ltd, USA) were supplied as cage-enrichment. The acclimatization period was at least 5 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions. On Day 6, the animals were group housed in Makrolon MII type cages with a sheet of paper instead of sawdust and cage enrichment.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
0, 5, 10, 25% concentrations
No. of animals per dose:
5 female rats per dose

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.2
Test group / Remarks:
5%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.1
Test group / Remarks:
10%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
8
Test group / Remarks:
25%
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
14

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5, 10 and 25% were 1.2, 1.1 and 8.0 respectively. An EC3 value of 14.1% was calculated using linear interpolation.

Executive summary:

The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5, 10 and 25% were 1.2, 1.1 and 8.0 respectively. An EC3 value of 14.1% was calculated using linear interpolation.