Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
19 Aug 2004 to 22 Aug 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Version / remarks:
1998
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: JMAFF 59 NohSan No. 4200
Version / remarks:
January 28, 1985
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Prometryn
EC Number:
230-711-3
EC Name:
Prometryn
Cas Number:
7287-19-6
Molecular formula:
C10H19N5S
IUPAC Name:
6-(methylsulfanyl)-N2,N4-di(propan-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Remarks:
albino
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 12 weeks
- Housing: The animals were singly housed in suspended stainless steel caging with mesh floors which conform to the size recommendations in the most recent Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals DHEW (NIH). Litter paper was placed beneath the cage and was changed at least three times per week.
- Diet: Pelleted Rabbit Chow
- Water: Filtered tap water was supplied ad-libitum by automatic water dispensing system.
- Acclimation period: 8 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-22
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 19 Aug 2004 To: 22 Aug 2004

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- One-tenth of a millilitre (0.03 grams)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single treatment
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males
Details on study design:
PREPARATION AND SELECTION OF ANIMALS
Prior to instillation, both eyes of a number of animals were examined using a fluorescein dye procedure. One drop of 2% ophthalmic fluorescein sodium was instilled into both eyes of each rabbit. The eyes were rinsed with physiological saline (0.9% NaCl) approximately 30 seconds after instillation of the fluorescein. Using an ultraviolet light source, the eyes were checked for gross abnormalities. Three healthy animals without pre-existing ocular irritation were selected for test.

INSTILLATION
Prior to use, the test substance was ground with a mortar and pestle. One-tenth of a milliliter (0.03 grams) of the test substance was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each rabbit by pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower lids were then gently held together for about one second before releasing to minimize loss of the test substance. The other eye of each rabbit remained untreated with the test substance and served as a control. The rabbits were then returned to their designated cages.

OCULAR SCORING
Ocular irritation was evaluated using a high-intensity white light in accordance with Draize et al. (see Table 1 at ‘Any other information on methods and materials incl. tables’) at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-instillation. The fluorescein dye evaluation procedure described above was used at 24 hours to verify the absence of corneal damage. In addition to observations of the cornea, iris and conjunctivae, any other observed lesions were noted. The average score for all rabbits at each scoring period was calculated to aid in data interpretation.

CAGE SIDE OBERVATIONS
The animals were observed for signs of gross toxicity and behavioural changes at least once daily during the test period. Observations included gross evaluation of skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes, respiratory, circulatory, autonomic and central nervous systems, somatomotor activity and behaviour pattern. Particular attention was directed to observation of tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhoea and coma.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Within the first hour following test substance instillation, “positive” conjunctivitis was observed in all three treated eyes. The overall incidence and severity of irritation decreased with time. All animals were free of ocular irritation within 48 hours.
Other effects:
All animals appeared active and healthy. There were no signs of gross toxicity, adverse pharmacologic effects or abnormal behaviour.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Individual eye irritation scores

 

Rabbit #1

Rabbit #2

Rabbit #3

 

Hours

Hours

Hours

 

1

24

48

72

1

24

48

72

1

24

48

72

I. Cornea

 

A. Opacity

0

0*

0

0

0

0*

0

0

0

0*

0

0

B. Area

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

(AxB)x5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

II. Iris

 

A. Values

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ax5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

III. Conjunctivae

 

A. Redness

2

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

B. Chemosis

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

C. Discharge

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

(A+B+C)x2

6

2

0

0

4

2

0

0

6

2

0

0

Total

6

2

0

0

4

2

0

0

6

2

0

0

* 2% ophthalmic fluorescein sodium used to verify the absence of corneal opacity.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the study (OECD 405, GLP), the mean irritation scores for the 24/48/72 hour time points were determined to be 0 for all animals for corneal opacity, iritis and chemosis. The mean irritation scores for the 24/48/72 hour time points for conjunctival redness was determined to be 0.33 for all animals.
Executive summary:

A primary eye irritation test was conducted with rabbits, in accordance with GLP and OECD guideline 405, to determine the irritation potential of the substance after a single instillation into the eye. An aliquot of 0.1 mL (0.03 grams) test substance was instilled into the right eye of three healthy rabbits. The left eye remained untreated and served as a control. Ocular irritation was evaluated by the method of Draize et al.

Within the first hour following test substance instillation, “positive” conjunctivitis was observed in all three treated eyes. The overall incidence and severity of irritation decreased with time. All animals were free from ocular irritation within 48 hours. The mean irritation scores for the time points after 24/48/72 hours were determined to be 0 for all animals for corneal opacity, iritis and chemosis. The mean irritation scores for the time points after 24/48/72 hours for conjunctival redness were determined to be 0.33 for all animals.

Under the conditions of this study, the test substance was considered to be not irritating to the eyes of rabbits.