Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
melting point/freezing point
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 102 (Melting point / Melting Range)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
capillary method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
potassium 5-amino-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-1-ide
Cas Number:
136369-04-5
Molecular formula:
CH2KN5
IUPAC Name:
potassium 5-amino-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-1-ide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
Batch no.: 08KI030

Results and discussion

Melting / freezing point
Key result
Melting / freezing pt.:
>= 262 - <= 270 °C
Decomposition:
yes
Remarks on result:
other: first signs of decomposition could be observed

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The determination was performed in duplicate. In both determinations, a melting range was detected. The melting range was determined as 262 to 270°C (535.2 to 543.2 K). These values are the means of two independent determinations.
Executive summary:

The validity criterion “difference between duplicate determinations” was met. The test item 5-Aminotetrazol Potassium showed a melting range, no melting point. It was noted, that a change in colour took place at 253 °C. No observations were made which might cause doubts on the validity of the study outcome. Therefore, the result of the study is considered valid.