Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and OECD guideline compliant study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Hydrogen [tris[[[3-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]propyl]amino]sulphonyl]-29H,31H-phthalocyaninesulphonato(3-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]cuprate(1-), compound with 3-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]propylamine (1:1)
EC Number:
304-661-9
EC Name:
Hydrogen [tris[[[3-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]propyl]amino]sulphonyl]-29H,31H-phthalocyaninesulphonato(3-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]cuprate(1-), compound with 3-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]propylamine (1:1)
Cas Number:
94277-77-7
Molecular formula:
C65 H84 Cu N11 O12 S4 .C11 H25 N O .H
IUPAC Name:
copper(2+) hydrogen 3-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]propan-1-amine 14,24,32-tris({[({3-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]propyl}amino)oxy]sulfonyl})-2,11,20,29,37,38,39,40-octaazanonacyclo[28.6.1.1³,¹⁰.1¹²,¹⁹.1²¹,²⁸.0⁴,⁹.0¹³,¹⁸.0²²,²⁷.0³¹,³⁶]tetraconta-1,3(40),4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28(38),29,31,33,35-nonadecaene-37,39-diide-5-sulfonate
Details on test material:
- Substance type: blue solid
- Physical state: solid
- Purity: UBCB substance (100%)
- Purity test date: 2014
- Lot/batch No.: 070037P040
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 01 January 2018
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature
- Other: The test substance appeared to be homogeneous.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 15.9 - 19.3 g
- Housing: all animals in one group were housed in a cage together as a group
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 2°C
- Humidity (%): 45 – 65%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2014-06-24 to 2014-07-29

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
5, 10, 25 % (w/w).
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: max 25% in DMF (suspension)
- Irritation: none (blue staining)
- Lymph node proliferation response:

MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: standard H-Methylthymidine incorporation
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: SI > 3

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION: Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface
of each ear with test item in dimethylformamide. The application volume, 25 μL/ear/day, was spread over the entire dorsal surface (diameter 8 mm) of each ear once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice (control animals) was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: 1.95 (25%) - 1.74 (10%) - 1.8 (5%)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Lymph Node Cell Counts after Sacrifice
Test item concentration
% (w/w)
Animal
No.
Lymph Node Cell Count
x10E06
per animal
Mean
Lymph Node
Cell Count
x10E06
per animal
SD Index
(Value Test Group versus
Value Control
Vehicle Control (DMF) 1 6.21 9.7 2.3 1.00
2 10.16
3 11.23
4 12.12
5 8.70
5 6 9.45 13.1 7.7 1.35
7 9.61
8 26.84
9 9.58
10 9.92
10 11 10.44 11.9 2.2 1.23
12 9.71
13 15.17
14 13.26
15 11.02
25 16 10.99 13.9 2.7 1.43
17 13.37
18 17.81
19 15.12
20 12.14

Ear Weights after Sacrifice
Test item concentration
% (w/w)
Animal
No.
Ear weight
mg
per animal
Mean Ear weight (mg) SD Index
(Value Test Group versus
Value Control)
Vehicle Control (DMF) 1 24.22 27.0 1.9 1.00
2 27.56
3 27.88
4 26.40
5 29.15
5.0% 6 29.12 27.8 1.2 1.03
7 28.20
8 26.06
9 28.49
10 27.05
10% 11 25.74 26.9 1.9 1.00
12 24.36
13 29.02
14 28.01
15 27.41
25% 16 26.33 27.2 1.6 1.01
17 29.49
18 28.08
19 26.31
20 25.71

Lymph Node Weights after Sacrifice
Test item concentration
% (w/w)
Animal
No.
Lymph Node weight
mg
per animal
Mean Lymph Node weight (mg) SD Index
(Value Test Group versus
Value Control
Vehicle Control (DMF) 6 4.89 5.6 0.7 1.00
7 5.32
8 6.29
9 6.36
10 5.14
5 16 5.45 5.5 0.3 0.98
17 5.63
18 5.03
19 5.60
20 5.78
10 21 6.23 6.5 1.1 1.16
22 5.40
23 8.16
24 7.04
25 5.58
25 26 6.71 6.4 0.8 1.14
27 6.39
28 7.27
29 6.50
30 5.13

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU