Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Between 20 September 2011 and 11 October 2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not effect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 26 June 2001
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Phosphoric acid, mono- and di-C6-10-alkyl esters
EC Number:
269-616-7
EC Name:
Phosphoric acid, mono- and di-C6-10-alkyl esters
Cas Number:
68307-94-8
Molecular formula:
Not applicable (a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this specific UVCB substance)
IUPAC Name:
Esterification Products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (even numbered)
Details on test material:
Sponsor's identification: Esterification products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (Even numbered)
CAS number : 68307-94-8
Identifier : TIS 02891
Description : amber coloured slightly viscous liquid
Batch number : CI1E0447 solvent free
Date received : 13 June 2011
Expiry date : 29 May 2013
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Female Wistar (RccHan:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The animals were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age. The bodyweights fell within an interval of ±20% of the mean initial bodyweight of the first treated group.

The animals were housed in groups of three in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately three to four hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.

The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 30 mg/ml or 200 mg/ml

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 ml/kg

DOSAGE PREPARATION: The test item was freshly prepared, as required, as a suspension at the appropriate concentration in distilled water.
The test item was formulated within two hours of being applied to the test system. It is assumed that the formulation was stable for this duration.


CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, 300 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose.
Doses:
300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 females at 300 mg/kg
6 females at 2000 mg/kg
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days

- Frequency of observations and weighing: The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for up to fourteen days.
Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to dosing and seven and fourteen days after treatment or at death.

- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes; At the end of the observation period the surviving animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross pathological examination. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities for examination of major organs. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 500 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits not given in study report.
Mortality:
Individual mortality data are given in Table 1.
There were no deaths.
Clinical signs:
other: Individual clinical observations are given in Table 2 and Table 3. Hunched posture and pilo erection were noted in one animal treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg. There were no other signs of systemic toxicity.
Gross pathology:
Individual necropsy findings are given in Table 6 and Table 7.
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1              Mortality Data

Dose Level mg/kg

Sex

Number of Animals Treated

Deaths During Day of Dosing
(Hours)

Deaths During Period After Dosing
(Days)

Deaths

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8-14

300

Female

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/3

2000

Female

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/3

Female

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/3

Table 2              Individual Clinical Observations - 300 mg/kg

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Effects Noted After Dosing
(Hours)

Effects Noted During Period After Dosing
(Days)

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

300

1-0

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1-1

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1-2

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


0 = No signs of systemic toxicity

Table 3              Individual Clinical Observations - 2000 mg/kg

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Effects Noted After Dosing
(Hours)

Effects Noted During Period After Dosing
(Days)

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2000

2-0

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-1

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-2

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3-0

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3-1

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3-2

Female

0

0

0

0

HP

HP

HP

H

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


0 =     No signs of systemic toxicity

H =     Hunched posture

P =     Pilo-erection

Table 4              Individual Bodyweights and Weekly Bodyweight Changes - 300 mg/kg

Dose Level

mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Bodyweight (g) at Day

Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week

0

7

14

1

2

300

1-0 Female

150

165

168

15

3

1-1 Female

156

171

174

15

3

1-2 Female

168

181

183

13

2

Table 5              Individual Bodyweights and Weekly Bodyweight Changes - 2000 mg/kg

Dose Level

mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Bodyweight (g) at Day

Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week

0

7

14

1

2

2000

2-0 Female

173

184

196

11

12

2-1 Female

175

189

200

14

11

2-2 Female

160

171

194

11

23

3-0 Female

187

190

195

3

5

3-1 Female

170

177

180

7

3

3-2 Female

175

178

186

3

8

Table 6              Individual Necropsy Findings - 300 mg/kg

Dose Level

mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Time of Death

Macroscopic Observations

300

1-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

1-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

1-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

Table 7              Individual Necropsy Findings - 2000 mg/kg

Dose Level

mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Time of Death

Macroscopic Observations

2000

2-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

3-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

3-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

3-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The acute oral median lethal dose (LDso) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2500 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System - Unclassified).
Executive summary:

Introduction.

The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test item following a single oral administration in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to be compatible with the following:

- OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 423 “Acute Oral Toxicity – Acute Toxic Class Method” (adopted17 December 2001)

- Method B1 tris Acute Toxicity (Oral) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008

- United States Environmental Protection Agency Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.1100 Acute Oral Toxicity, 2002

-Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 26 June 2001

- Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1992

Method. 

A group of three fasted females was treated with the test item at a dose level of 300 mg/kg bodyweight. This was followed by a further group of three fasted females at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Based on the results from this dose level a further group of three fasted females was treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Dosing was performed sequentially.

The test item was administered orally as asuspension in distilled water. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

Mortality. 

There were no deaths.

Clinical Observations. 

Hunched posture and pilo‑erection were noted in one animal treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg. There were no other signs of systemic toxicity.

Bodyweight. 

All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period.

Necropsy. 

No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Conclusion. 

The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2500 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System ‑ Unclassified).

The test item did not meet the criteria for classification according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation (CLP).