Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
04.03.2019 - 07.03.2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.1 (Test for oxidizing solids)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
The sample was placed on a rotary evaporator at 40°C until no more water evaporated; the sample was spread onto trays and placed in an oven at 40°C for approximately 6 days with frequent agitation. The partially wet sample was removed from the trays and frozen. Whilst frozen the sample was ground to a fine powder then spread on trays and placed back into the oven at 40°C for 24 hours.
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Duration of test (contact time):
1 766 s
Key result
Sample tested:
1:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
353.2 s
Remarks on result:
mixture does not ignite and burn

During testing of the 1:1 test mixture, the coil broke at times between 16 s and 420 s on 5 occasions. Reactions did not proceed to completion once the coil broke. Testing was repeated until 5 valid test runs were obtained.

During testing of the 4:1 test mixture, for all 5 initial test runs the coil broke before reactions had completed. The coil broke after durations ranging from 96 s to 191 s. However, as no propagation was observed in any of the tests, it is clear the sample is not as reactive as the reference material and therefore is not an oxidiser.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Not classified as a material of UN Division 5.1
Executive summary:

No propagation was observed in any of the tests, it is clear the sample is not as reactive as the reference material and therefore is not an oxidiser.

Description of key information

No propagation was observed in any of the tests, it is clear the sample is not as reactive as the reference material and therefore is not an oxidiser.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification