Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-166-3 | CAS number: 16026-16-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 08 May to 11 May 2018 (definitive test)
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The temperature of the test area was briefly below the minimum (21.0 °C) for this type of test on one occasion, however this deviation was not considered to have impacted or affected the integrity of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: SOAP005-2
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 15 October 2022
- Purity: min. 95%
- Purity test date: Not reported
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Ambient - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: All test concentrations and control
- Sampling method: At the start of the test (0 h) samples for chemical analysis were taken from the remaining test media and at 24, 48 and 72 h test media from replicates of each treatment group were pooled and the samples were taken from the pooled test media.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Samples were kept frozen until analysis. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: The test item was prepared at 100 mg/L by dispersing 50.6 mg of test item in 500 mL of OECD medium. To disperse the test item, the solution was shaken and treated with ultrasound for 20 minutes. An aliquot (81 mL) was diluted to 1000 mL with the medium to give the stock at 8.10 mg/L. This stock was then diluted (333 ml made up to 1000 ml) with medium to give the next concentration. The remaining stocks were prepared by serial dilution in the same way.
- Controls: OECD medium control - Test organisms (species):
- Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green algae
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP)
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Stock algae was in the exponential growth phase
- Method of cultivation: A primary culture was established by the addition of approximately 0.1 ml of the algal stock to 100 mL of OECD medium contained in a 250 mL conical flask. The culture was incubated for ca. 72 hours under conditions similar to the test.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: approximately 72 hours
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): The same as test
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: None reported - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- Not reported
- Test temperature:
- Test start: 22.6 - 22.9 °C
Test end: 21.6 - 22.6°C - pH:
- Test start: 6.88 - 7.13
Test end: 7.68 - 7.81 - Dissolved oxygen:
- Not reported.
- Salinity:
- N/A
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0.1, 0.3, 0.9, 2.7 and 8.1 mg/L
Geometric mean measured: 0.05, 0.12, 0.379, 0.582 and 3.87 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: sterile conical flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): The test vessels were stoppered with air permeable stoppers in order to reduce evaporation and prevent dust and microorganisms from entering the solutions.
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Aliquots (100 mL) of the solutions were dispensed into sterile conical flasks with a total capacity of 250 mL.
- Aeration: The test vessels were placed on an orbital platform shaker and continually agitated at ca. 140 rpm in order to facilitate gaseous exchange.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): Not applicable
- Initial cells density: 5E3 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: approx. 5.11E5 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes, OECD medium
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: OECD medium
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: The pH and temperature were determined in each of the bulk solutions and the media prior to starting the test and in a single vessel from each concentration at the end of the test period.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: The initial pH of the test media was measured and then adjusted to pH 8.1 ± 0.1, as required, using 1M NaOH or HCl
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: 7840 – 7910 (mean 7858) lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : The cell biomass was determined by sampling every 24 hours (± 1 hour).
- Determination of cell concentrations: Cell biomass was determined by cell counts using a haemocytometer.
- Other: Microscopic observations were made of the appearance of the cell cultures during the test.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.0
- Range finding study: yes
- Test concentrations in the range finder test: 100, 10, 1.0 and 0.1 mg test item/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The results of the range finder test showed that there was 8% inhibition of biomass at 0.1 mg test item L-1, at 1.0 mg test item L-1, 30% inhibition was observed and at 10 and 100 mg test item L-1, 100% inhibition of yield was observed. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate, test conducted on 26 April 2018
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1.09 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 0.870 - 1.29 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.241 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: NA - 0.564 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 3.67 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 3.34 - 4.02 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.21 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 0.5 - 2.92 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.12 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.9 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.379 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.671 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 0.295 - 0.877 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.337 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 0.255 - 0.373 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.48 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 1.19 - 1.84 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.46 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence intervals: 0.426 - 0.498 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.12 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.9 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.379 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): In the 0.1 and 0.3 mg/L treatments cells appeared normal. In the 0.9 mg/L treatment there were some small cells, in the 2.7 mg/L treatment there were small cells, swollen cells and abnormal shaped cells and in the 8.1 mg/L treatment there were small and abnormal shaped cells. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The results of the most recent reference test (Study No. ENV-18-012, 26 April 2018), with potassium dichromate, showed that P. subcapitata had an EC50 for specific growth rate of 2.17 mg/L. The EC50 for the inhibition of yield (biomass) was 0.819 mg/L. These results indicated that the methods used to culture and test P. subcapitata were acceptable.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical analysis was carried out using CETIS™ v 1.9.7.2 software. The NOEC and LOEC values based on growth rate and yield (biomass) were estimated using a Dunnett multiple comparison test. The replicates for each control and treatment group were pooled before analysis then non-linear regression model with the best fit to the specific data set was applied. To calculate the ECx values for growth rate a 3 Parameter Cumulative log-normal (Probit) test was used and for biomass a 3 Parameter Log-logistic test was used.
The NOEC was defined as the test concentration below the lowest concentration that resulted in a statistically significant effect. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value ≤ 0.05. Where no statistical significance is seen at any of the treatment groups the NOEC was taken to be the highest concentration tested.
Where possible the ECx and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using regression analysis. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Specific growth rate and factor increase for controls were 1.54 and 102.4, respectively (>16); mean CoV section by section specific growth rates controls was 15.5% (<35%); CoV average specific growth rates in replicate controls at 72 hours 3.8% (<7%)
- Conclusions:
- Based on nominal concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 for the green algae, P. subcapitata, were 3.67 mg/L and 1.48 mg/L, respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.3 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.9 mg/L. Based on geometric mean concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 were 1.21 mg/L and 0.460 mg/L respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.120 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.379 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed according to the OECD 201 guideline to assess the effects of the test item, calcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl)aminoacetate], on the growth of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Dickinson 2019).
The cells were exposed to five nominal concentrations of calcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl) aminoacetate], 0.100, 0.300, 0.900, 2.70 and 8.10 mg/L for 72 hours under static conditions. The test item concentrations were analysed using a LC-MS MRM method and the geometric mean concentrations were 0.05, 0.120, 0.379, 0.582 and 3.87 mg/L. As analytical recoveries were outside the range of 100% ± 20% of nominal, study endpoints were expressed in terms of both nominal concentration and geometric mean measured concentrations. All validity criteria for the definitive test were met. The data were statistically analysed with CETIS v1.9.2.7 statistical software package.
The study was conducted according to the OECD guideline and is GLP-compliant, therefore is reliable without restrictions and is considered as suitable as a key study for this endpoint.
Based on nominal concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 for the green algae, P. subcapitata, were 3.67 mg/L and 1.48 mg/L respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.3 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.9 mg/L.
Based on geometric mean concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 were 1.21 mg/L and 0.460 mg/L respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.120 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.379 mg/L.
Reference
Table 1: Summary of specific growth rate data
Nominal test concentration (mg/L) |
Mean average specific growth rate/day (0 to 72 h) |
Mean % inhibition (0 to 72 h) |
Control |
1.539 |
0 |
0.1 |
1.519 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
1.548 |
-0.6 |
0.9 |
1.457 |
5* |
2.7 |
0.949 |
38* |
8.1 |
0.321 |
80* |
*statistically significantly different from the control (p = ≤0.05).
Table 2. The cell counts and percentage of yield inhibition
Nominal test item conc. (mg/L) |
Number of cells (cells / mL ) |
|||
0 Hours |
72 -hour mean cell count |
72-hours mean yield |
Mean percentage inhibition of yield |
|
Control |
5,000 |
511,875 |
506,875 |
N/A |
0.1 |
483,333 |
478,333 |
6 |
|
0.3 |
523,333 |
518,333 |
-2 |
|
0.9 |
404,167 |
399,167a |
21 |
|
2.7 |
86,296 |
81,296a |
84 |
|
8.1 |
13,148 |
8,148a |
98 |
N/A = not applicable.
a Statistically significantly different from the control (p = ≤0.05).
Table 3: Analytical recoveries of calcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl) aminoacetate]
Analytical recoveries expressed as test item mg/L |
||||||
Nominal test item conc. |
T0 hours |
T72 hours |
Geometric mean |
Geometric mean as % nominal |
||
mg/L |
% Nominal |
mg/L |
% Nominal |
|||
0 |
0.009a |
NA |
0.023a |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.1 |
0.013b |
13 |
0.091b |
91 |
0.0500b,c |
50c |
0.3 |
0.042b |
14 |
0.287 |
96 |
0.120c |
40c |
0.9 |
0.206 |
23 |
0.699 |
78 |
0.379 |
42 |
2.7 |
0.654 |
24 |
0.518 |
19 |
0.582 |
22 |
8.1 |
5.089 |
63 |
2.948 |
36 |
3.87 |
48 |
NA = not applicable. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for calcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl) aminoacetate] was 0.1 mg/L. The limit of detection for the method was 0.002 mg/L.
acalcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl) aminoacetate] was detected in the controls however this was < LOQ.
bThese results were below the LOQ of the analytical method.
cAs the measured values for these samples were below the LOQ of the analytical method, the final geometric mean has been calculated using a value of half the LOQ.
Description of key information
Based on nominal concentrations, the 72 hour ErC50 and EyC50 for the green algae, P. subcapitata, were 3.67 mg/L and 1.48 mg/L respectively. The 72-hour NOEC was 0.3 mg/L and the 72 hour LOEC was 0.9 mg/L, based on growth rate and yield. Based on geometric mean concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 were 1.21 mg/L and 0.460 mg/L respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.120 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.379 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 1.21 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 0.12 mg/L
Additional information
A study was performed according to the OECD 201 guideline to assess the effects of the test item, calcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl)aminoacetate], on the growth of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Dickinson 2019).
The cells were exposed to five nominal concentrations of calcium bis[(Z)-N-methyl-N-(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl) aminoacetate], 0.100, 0.300, 0.900, 2.70 and 8.10 mg/L (geometric mean concentrations: 0.05, 0.120, 0.379, 0.582 and 3.87 mg/L) for 72 hours under static conditions.
Based on nominal concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 for the green algae, P. subcapitata, were 3.67 mg/L and 1.48 mg/L respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.3 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.9 mg/L. Based on geometric mean concentrations, the 72-hour ErC50 and EyC50 were 1.21 mg/L and 0.460 mg/L respectively. The 0 to 72-hour NOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.120 mg/L and the 0-72 hour LOEC for growth rate and biomass was 0.379 mg/L.
The study is a guideline study and is GLP-compliant, therefore is reliable without restrictions and is considered as suitable as a key study for this endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.