Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Administrative data

Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
November 16 - December 12, 2007
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Testing was performed according to guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
cascade impaction
Type of distribution:
other: gravimetric

Test material

Results and discussion

Particle size
Percentile:
D50
Mean:
> 10 µm
Remarks on result:
other: Migrated from fields under 'Mass median diameter' as D50 percentile. No source field for Standard deviation.
Particle size distribution at different passagesopen allclose all
No.:
#1
Size:
> 5.5 - <= 10 µm
Distribution:
10.3 %
No.:
#2
Size:
> 2.4 - <= 5.5 µm
Distribution:
2.9 %
No.:
#3
Size:
> 1.61 - <= 2.4 µm
Distribution:
1.4 %
No.:
#4
Size:
> 0.307 - <= 1.61 µm
Distribution:
1 %
No.:
#5
Size:
> 0 - <= 0.307 µm
Distribution:
0.7 %

Any other information on results incl. tables

The particle size distribution from the cascade impactor method are summarized in Table 1. The particle size distribution from the sieve method are shown in Table 2.

Table 1: Results of Cascade Impactor for Individual Cut-Points

Cut Point (μm)

Test 1

Test 2

Test 3

Mean Cumulative % of Test material

grams Test Material (mean)

Frequency (%)

Test Material (g)

Cumulative Mass of Test Material (g)

Cumulative % of Test Material

Test Material (g)

Cumulative Mass of Test Material (g)

Cumulative % of Test Material

Test Material (g)

Cumulative Mass of Test Material (g)

Cumulative % of Test Material

>10

2.5374

-

-

2.2134

-

-

2.5236

-

-

-

2.4248

80.8

10

0.2281

0.3140

10.4

0.2673

0.3848

14.0

0.1

0.1873

6.6

10.3

0.2134

7.1

5.5

0.0398

0.0859

2.85

0.0573

0.1175

4.26

0.0247

0.0425

1.49

2.9

0.0406

1.4

2.4

0.0135

0.0461

1.53

0.0200

0.0602

2.18

0.0058

0.0178

0.622

1.4

0.0131

0.4

1.61

0.0094

0.0326

1.08

0.0113

0.0402

1.46

0.0034

0.012

0.419

1.0

0.0080

0.3

0.307

0.0232

0.0232

0.77

0.0300

0.0289

1.05

0.0086

0.0086

0.301

0.7

0.0202

0.7

Table 2: Particle Size by Sieving Method

Sieve aperture size (μm)

100

Mass of test material transferred to sieve (g)

20

Mass of test material passed through sieve (g)

14.45

Test material less than sieve aperture size (%)

72.3

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The particle size distribution of the test substance determined by sieving and cascade impaction was:
72.3 % < 100 um (sieving)
10.3% < 10 um
2.87% < 5.5 um
1.44% < 2.4 um
0.99% < 1.61 um
0.71% < 0.307 um
Executive summary:

The particle size distribution of the test substance was determined by a sieving method (using a 100 um sieve) and by cascade impaction using a Marple Miller Cascade Impactor with five cut-point diameters of 10, 5.5, 2.4, 1.61 and 0.307 μm and a final glass fiber filter. Particle size data obtained for the test material gave the following distributions:

Particle size
Cumulative % Method
< 100 μm (inhalable) 72.3 Sieve
 < 10.0 μm (thoracic) 10.32 Cascade Impactor
 < 5.5 μm (respirable) 2.87 Cascade Impactor
< 2.4 μm 1.44 Cascade Impactor
<1.61 μm 0.99 Cascade Impactor
< 0.307 0.71 Cascade Impactor