Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Aluminium triethanolate
EC Number:
209-105-8
EC Name:
Aluminium triethanolate
Cas Number:
555-75-9
Molecular formula:
C2H6O.1/3Al
IUPAC Name:
aluminum triethanolate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Remarks:
RccHan:WIST
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS (UK) Ltd.
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Rationale for use of males (if applicable) : NA
- Age at study initiation: 8 to 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 157 to 175 g
- Fasting period before study: Yes overnight before dosing and for 4 hours after.
- Housing: The cages were solid bottomed polycarbonate cages with a stainless steel mesh lid. Each cage contained a quantity of autoclaved softwood bark-free fiber bedding. Cages, food hoppers, water bottles and bedding were changed at appropriate intervals.
- Historical data: Available on commonly used species for varying endpoints
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum (except for during fasting)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days before treatment

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 to 24°C
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light/dark cycle

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 30 or 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw
- Justification for choice of vehicle: Substance is hygroscopic so non-aqueous vehicle used. Corn oil is a standard vehicle in rodent toxicology studies.

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg bw

CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: No other data available so starting dose selected as 300 mg/kg as per the OECD guideline.
Doses:
300 or 2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
300 mg/kg: 1 female
2000 mg/kg: 5 females
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: The weight of each rat was recorded on Days -1 (not reported), 1 (prior to dosing), 8 and 15. Individual weekly body weight changes and group mean body weights were calculated.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: Animals were observed soon after dosing and at frequent intervals for the remainder of Day 1. On subsequent days, animals were observed once in the morning and again at the end of the experimental day (with the exception of Day 15 - morning only). The nature and severity, where appropriate, of any clinical signs and the time were recorded at each observation. Cages were checked twice daily for evidence of mortality.

All animals were subject to a macroscopic examination which consisted of opening the cranial, thoracic and abdominal cavities. The macroscopic appearance of the brain, cecum, duodenum, heart, kidneys, small and large intestine, liver, lungs and bronchi, spleen, stomach, subcutaneous tissue and urinary bladder was recorded.
Statistics:
Not conducted (not a requirement of the study guideline)

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
There were no deaths during study
Clinical signs:
There were no clinical signs of reaction to treatment throughout the study.
Body weight:
A low body weight gain was seen in animal 122, dosed at 2000 mg/kg, on Days 8-15. All other animals were considered to have achieved satisfactory body weight gains throughout the study.
Gross pathology:
Pallor of the liver was seen in animal 126, dosed at 2000 mg/kg. All other animals were considered to have no abnormalities noted at the macroscopic examination at study termination on Day 15.
Other findings:
Not applicable

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The acute median lethal oral dose (LD50) to rats of the test substance was demonstrated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight.