Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Acute Oral Toxicity of Isotridecyl isononanoate - TOPKAT
1 Substance
1.1 CAS number 42131-27-1
1.2 EC number 255-673-5
1.3 Chemical name
IUPAC 11-Methyldodecyl 7-methyloctanoate
CAS Octanoic acid, 7-methyl-, 11-methyldodecyl ester
Other Isotridecyl isononanoate
1.4 Structural formula

1.5 Structure codes
SMILES O=C(OCCCCCCCCCCC(C)C)CCCCCC(C)C
InChI InChI=1S/C22H44O2/c1-20(2)16-12-9-7-5-6-8-10-15-19-24-22(23)18-14-11-13-17-21(3)4/h20-21H,5-19H2,1-4H3
Other
Stereochemical features N/A

2 General Information
2.1 Date of QPRF 26 April 2018
2.2 Author and contact details Envigo, Shardlow Business Park, London Road, Shardlow, Derbyshire, DE72 2GD

3 Prediction
3.1 Endpoint (OECD Principle 1)
Endpoint Acute oral toxicity
Dependent variable Oral rat LD50 -log10(mol/kg)
3.2 Algorithm (OECD Principle 2)
Model or submodel name BIOVIA (TOPKAT) toxicity prediction model – Rat Oral LD50
Model version 4.5
Reference to QMRF The corresponding QMRF with the identifier Q51-54-55-502 is available at http://qsardb.jrc.it/qmrf/index.jsp.
Predicted values (model result) Default model: LD50 = 16.838 g/kg bw
Extended model: LD50 = 21.136 g/kg bw
Predicted values (comments) The extended model contains a number of identified data points from published literature in addition to those already used by the software. In this instance, the nearest identified structures were the same for both models. While the extended model is considered reliable, was a worst case conservative estimate, the lowest of the two values is used for this assessment. The full printouts for both results and the model extension criteria are provided below.

Input for prediction Smiles
Descriptor values Descriptor Value
LogP 8.45
Molecular weight (g/mol) 340.584
Number of hydrogen bond donors 0
Number of hydrogen bond acceptors 2
Number of rotatable bonds in the molecule 18
The fraction of polar surface area over the total molecular surface area 0.06
ECFP_6: Unitless Extended-connectivity fingerprint with a maximum length of 6 bonds Not applicable
FCFP_6 Unitless Functional class fingerprint with a maximum length of 6 bonds Not applicable
MDL Public Keys Unitless Fingerprint based on the MDL public keys Not applicable

3.3 Applicability domain (OECD Principle 3)
Domains i. All properties and OPS components are within expected ranges.
ii. All fingerprint features of the query molecule are found in the training set
iii. Considerations on the mechanism domain are not applicable since statistical model
Structural analogues i Octadecanoic acid; butyl ester
ii Azelaic acid; dihexyl ester
iii. Oleic acid; 2;3-epoxypropyl ester
iv. 9;10 epoxystearic acid; allyl ester

Consideration on structural analogues With 56% the average similarity of the four most similar structures to the query structure is considered moderate. Predicted and experimental values of similar structures vary by a factor of up to 1.68 (2.24 extended) which is below a default factor of 10 often used in traditional risk assessment of environmental chemicals to compensate for uncertainties*.Hence concordance between predicted and actual value is High.
3.4 The uncertainty of the prediction (OECD principle 4)
As there is only moderate similarity of structural analogues in the prediction, this may indicate some uncertainty in the prediction. However, accuracy and concordance of the measured and predicted results for the similar structures affords some confidence in the prediction.
3.5 The chemical and biological mechanisms according to the model underpinning the predicted result (OECD principle 5)
Not applicable since statistical model

4 Adequacy (Optional)
4.1 Regulatory purpose Acute toxicity endpoint for REACh registration.

4.2 Approach for regulatory interpretation of the model result
Unit conversion not required for the non-extended results as these are reported as g/kg body weight.
For the extended results, the following calculation:
power (10, -TOPKAT_Rat_Oral_LD50)*molecular weight
(g/mol)

4.3 Outcome The predicted acute toxicity LD50 of 16.838 g/kg is greater than the thresholds for classification under CLP and GHS.

4.4 Conclusion There is some uncertainty in the prediction due to the moderate similarity of structural analogues. Confidence can be taken howver from the the identified accuracy and concordance of the measured and predicted results for the similar structures.
Therefore, the result is considered reliable, however, application of further QSAR models is recommended to create a weight of evidence.

*Stedeford, T.; Zhao, Q.J.; Dourson, M.L.; Banasik, M.; Hsu, C.H. The application of non-default uncertainty factors in the US EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Part I: UFL, UFS, and “Other uncertainty factors”. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. C 2007, 25, 245–279.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Principle of test: QSAR - TOPKAT
- Short description of test conditions: n/a
- Parameters analysed / observed: 2 methods of LD50 prediciton

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Isotridecyl isononanoate
EC Number:
255-673-5
EC Name:
Isotridecyl isononanoate
Cas Number:
42131-27-1
Molecular formula:
C22H44O2
IUPAC Name:
Isotridecyl isononanoate

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Key result
Sex:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
16 838 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: Non extended model
Sex:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
21 136 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: extened model

Any other information on results incl. tables

Acute Oral Toxicity of Isotridecyl isononanoate - TOPKAT

1

Substance

 

 

 

1.1

CAS number

 

42131-27-1

 

1.2

EC number

 

255-673-5

 

1.3

Chemical name

 

 

 

 

 

IUPAC

11-Methyldodecyl 7-methyloctanoate

 

 

 

CAS

Octanoic acid, 7-methyl-, 11-methyldodecyl ester

 

 

 

Other

Isotridecyl isononanoate

 

1.4

Structural formula

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

Structure codes

 

 

 

 

 

SMILES

O=C(OCCCCCCCCCCC(C)C)CCCCCC(C)C

 

 

 

InChI

InChI=1S/C22H44O2/c1-20(2)16-12-9-7-5-6-8-10-15-19-24-22(23)18-14-11-13-17-21(3)4/h20-21H,5-19H2,1-4H3

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Stereochemical features

N/A

 

2

General Information

 

 

 

2.1

Date of QPRF

 

26 April 2018

 

2.2

Author and contact details

Envigo, Shardlow Business Park, London Road, Shardlow, Derbyshire, DE72 2GD

 

3

Prediction

 

 

 

3.1

Endpoint (OECD Principle 1)

 

 

 

 

Endpoint

Acute oral toxicity

 

 

 

Dependent variable

Oral rat LD50 -log10(mol/kg)

 

3.2

Algorithm (OECD Principle 2)

 

 

 

 

Model or submodel name

BIOVIA (TOPKAT) toxicity prediction model – Rat Oral LD50

 

 

 

Model version

4.5

 

 

 

Reference to QMRF

The corresponding QMRF with the identifier Q51-54-55-502 is available at http://qsardb.jrc.it/qmrf/index.jsp.

 

 

 

Predicted values (model result)

Default model:      LD50= 16.838 g/kg bw

Extended model:   LD50= 21.136 g/kg bw

 

 

 

Predicted values (comments)

The extended model contains a number of identified data points from published literature in addition to those already used by the software. In this instance, the nearest identified structures were the same for both models. While the extended model is considered reliable, was a worst case conservative estimate, the lowest of the two values is used for this assessment. The full printouts for both results and the model extension criteria are provided below.

 

 

 

 

Input for prediction

Smiles

 

 

 

Descriptor values

Descriptor

Value

LogP

8.45

Molecular weight (g/mol)

340.584

Number of hydrogen bond donors

0

Number of hydrogen bond acceptors

2

Number of rotatable bonds in the molecule

18

The fraction of polar surface area over the total molecular surface area

0.06

ECFP_6: Unitless Extended-connectivity fingerprint with a maximum length of 6 bonds

Not applicable

FCFP_6 Unitless Functional class fingerprint with a maximum length of 6 bonds

Not applicable

MDL Public Keys Unitless Fingerprint based on the MDL public keys

Not applicable

 

3.3

Applicability domain (OECD Principle 3)

 

 

 

Domains

i.

All properties and OPS components are within expected ranges.

ii.

All fingerprint features of the query molecule are found in the training set

iii.

Considerations on the mechanism domain are not applicable since statistical model

 

 

 

Structural analogues

i

Octadecanoic acid; butyl ester

ii

Azelaic acid; dihexyl ester

iii.

Oleic acid; 2;3-epoxypropyl ester

iv.

9;10 epoxystearic acid; allyl ester

 

 

 

Consideration on structural analogues

With 56% the average similarity of the four most similar structures to the query structure is considered moderate. Predicted and experimental values of similar structures vary by a factor of up to 1.68 (2.24 extended) which is below a default factor of 10 often used in traditional risk assessment of environmental chemicals to compensate for uncertainties*.Hence concordance between predicted and actual value is High.

 

3.4

The uncertainty of the prediction (OECD principle 4)

 

 

 

 

As there is only moderate similarity of structural analogues in the prediction, this may indicate some uncertainty in the prediction. However, accuracy and concordance of the measured and predicted results for the similar structures affords some confidence in the prediction.

 

3.5

The chemical and biological mechanisms according to the model underpinning the predicted result (OECD principle 5)

 

 

 

 

Not applicable since statistical model

 

4

Adequacy (Optional)

 

 

 

4.1

Regulatory purpose

Acute toxicity endpoint for REACh registration.

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

Approach for regulatory interpretation of the model result

 

 

 

Unit conversion not required for the non-extended results as these are reported as g/kg body weight.

For the extended results, the following calculation:

power (10, -TOPKAT_Rat_Oral_LD50)*molecular weight

(g/mol)

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

Outcome

The predicted acute toxicity LD50of 16.838 g/kg is greater than the thresholds for classification under CLP and GHS.

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

Conclusion

There is some uncertainty in the prediction due to the moderate similarity of structural analogues. Confidence can be taken howver from the the identified accuracy and concordance of the measured and predicted results for the similar structures.

Therefore, the result is considered reliable, however, application of further QSAR models is recommended to create a weight of evidence.

 

*Stedeford, T.; Zhao, Q.J.; Dourson, M.L.; Banasik, M.; Hsu, C.H. The application of non-default uncertainty factors in the US EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Part I: UFL, UFS, and “Other uncertainty factors”. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. C 2007, 25, 245–279.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The two predictions for the extended (21,136 mg/kg bw) and non-extended model (16,838 mg/kg bw) from the TOPKAT software both show moderate similarity between the closest structures to the target compound and the target compound itself. The default prediction shows a lower value than the extended model. The extension is built upon published data which has been included into the model. An assessment for the predicted and measured values for the nearest structures in the dataset showed that the concordance between these values was high. However, while the prediction statistics suggest the model is reliable, there is some concern regarding the similarity of the closest structures.