Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
additional toxicological information
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
Study period:
23 Apr - 26 May 1990
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, well documented study report which meets basic scientific principles.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1990

Materials and methods

Type of study / information:
Comedogenicity potential of the test substance
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The study was performed to assess the comedogenicity potential of the test substance by repeated application to the external ear canal of the New Zealand White rabbit according to Kligman and Kwong (1979).
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-ethylhexyl palmitate
EC Number:
249-862-1
EC Name:
2-ethylhexyl palmitate
Cas Number:
29806-73-3
Molecular formula:
C24H48O2
IUPAC Name:
2-ethylhexyl palmitate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-ethylhexyl palmitate
- Physical state: colourless liquid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: 950
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

Increased follicular keratosis (gredes 1 -2 on a scale of 0 -5) was noted in the treated ears. The hyperkeratosis became apparent in one treated ear after the first application, in one treated ear after the second application and in the remaining treated ear after the third application. A local irritating effect was observed by slight or well defined erythema or flaking of the epidermis, was noted in all treated ears during the study period.

Also slight to strong hyperkeratosis (grades 1 -3 on a scale of 0 -3) was noted in all treated ears. Slight hyperkeratosis (grade 1) were noted in one untreated control ear.

Applicant's summary and conclusion