Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

As no valid studies on the mutagenic potential of isovaleraldehyde in bacterial mutation assays could be identified, other related aldehydes will be used as supporting substances for read across.tests are available for valeraldehyde, butyraldehyde, and isobutyraldehyde. These aldehydes are closely related to isovaleraldehyde (structural isomer with a linear carbon chain, linear and branched chain aliphatic aldehydes reduced in length by one carbon atom). Reactivity and physico-chemical properties as well as metabolism of these aldehydes are very similar to isovaleraldehyde, thus justifying the use of these substances for cross reading.

 

In the following table, the studies used in the genetic toxicity assessment of isovaleraldehyde are listed together with some basic information.

 

 

Study

Substance

Reliability

GLP

Test type/
Protocol

Guideline

Results

Remarks

In vitro tests;
gene mutation studies in bacteria

NTP
1988

Read across
Valeraldehyde

2

no data

Ames

similar to
OECD 471

negative

tested up to 2000 µg/plate with and without metab. activ.

Mortelmans
1986

Read across
butyraldehyde

2

no data

Ames

similar to
OECD 471

negative

tested up to 3333 µg/plate with and without metab. activ.

NTP
1999

Read across
isobutyraldehyde

2

no data

Ames

similar to
OECD 471

negative

tested up to 10,000 µg/plate with and without metab. activ.

Mortelmans
1986

Read across
propylaldehyde

2

no data

Ames

similar to
OECD 471

negative

tested up to 10,000 µg/plate with and without metab. activ.

In vitro tests,
studies in mammalian cells

Obe/Tucker
1979/1993

isovaleraldehyde

2

no

SCE

similar to
OECD 479

weak positive

human lymphcytes;
without metabolic activation;
2 concentrations
16 and 24 µg/mL;
only 2-fold increase in SCE frequencies per mitosis

In vivo test

NTP
1999

Read across
isobutyraldehyde

2

no data

Chronic cancer study

OECD 451

negative

mouse

NTP
1999

Read across
isobutyraldehyde

2

no data

Chronic cancer study

OECD 451

negative

rat

BASF AG
2001

Isovaleraldehyde

1

 yes

MNT

similar to
OECD 474

negative

single ip injection;

3 concentrations up to
100 mg/kg bw (overt toxicity)

 

 

The Ames tests for the supporting aldehydes were all negative. It is concluded that an Ames test with isovaleraldehyde would be negative too.

 

The result of the SCE assay with human lymphocytes was weakly positive. For other aldehydes (e.g. valeraldehyde), it has been demonstrated that other in vitro mammalian cell assays (gene mutation HPRT, UDS, alkaline elution) showed positive results. It is very likely that isovaleraldehyde would test positive in similar in vitro tests using mammalian cell systems.

 

Isovaleraldehyde was tested in a valid mouse bone marrow micronucleus test in vivo according to OECD TG 474 with negative result (BASF, 2001). After intraperitoneal injection of increasing single doses of isovaleraldehyde up to 100 mg/kg bw, no increase in polychromatic erythrocytes containing neither small nor large micronuclei was observed. At the highest dose, overt toxicity were observed. There was no indication of a genotoxic potential of isovaleraldehyde in this in vivo micronucleus test.

 

Positive test results are often observed in in-vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests, whereas the respective in-vivo test results are negative. In vivo tests represent much more physiological conditions, i.e. absorption, distribution, and metabolism and excretion, and, therefore, are considered to rule out positive in-vitro test results. This is also supported by the observations with isobutyraldehyde, which was positive in mammalian cell tests, but which was negative in two rodent oncogenicity tests conducted by NTP.,

 

Taking into account the above information on mutagenic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic effects of isovaleraldehyde and supporting aldehydes, it is concluded that isovaleraldehyde is not genotoxic.

 

 


Short description of key information:
Isovaleraldehyde is considered to be negative in bacterial cell test systems, based on read across to related substances (valeraldehyde, butyraldehyde, propionaldehyde and isobutyraldehyde) which were all negative. Isovaleraldehyde was weakly positive in a sister chromatid exchange assay with human lymphocytes in vitro, but it was negative in an in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test according to OECD TG 474. Overall, isovaleraldehyde is considered to lack genotoxic properties.

Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on results available (see under Discussion), isovaleraldehyde does not meet classification criteria neither of Directive 67/548/EEC for heritable genetic damage or irreversible effects nor of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (Annex I Sect. 3.5.2) for germ cell mutagenicity.