Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of 2-{[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]amino}ethanaminium chloride and 2-{benzyl[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]amino}ethanaminium chloride and N-[2-(benzylamino)ethyl]-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propan-1-aminium chloride and N-[2-(dibenzylamino)ethyl]-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propan-1-aminium chloride and N-benzyl-2-{benzyl[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]amino}ethanaminium chloride and N-benzyl-N-[2-(dibenzylamino)ethyl]-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propan-1-aminium chloride.
EC number: 700-961-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
28-day repeated dose oral toxicity study (OECD TG 407, GLP): NOAEL = 150 mg/kg bw/day (Mortality in the 800 mg/kg bw dose group).
90 -day repeated dose oral toxicity study (OECD TG 408, GLP): NOAEL = 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on the findings from the recent sub-chronic repeated dose toxicity study with reaction mass containing six benzylated amine silanes it is not expected that the mortality observed in the sub-acute study at the highest dose of 800 mg/kg bw was treatment related. Therefore, the sub-chronic study was chosen as the key study for risk assessment of the registered substance.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 13 Apr - 11 May 1993
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- (1981)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.7 (Repeated Dose (28 Days) Toxicity (Oral))
- Version / remarks:
- (1984)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males: 153-283 g, females: 134-233 g
- Fasting period before study: 18-25 hours prior to and 3-4 hours after dosing
- Housing: The animals were housed in groups of 5 per sex to a cage, using stainless steel suspended cages with wire mesh floors. The animals were identified by earmarks and tattoos.
- Diet (ad libitum): standard pelleted laboratory animal diet (Kliba, Klingentalmühle AG, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland). Each batch was analysed for contaminants and results were examined and archived.
- Water (ad libitum): tap-water. Results of chemical and contaminants analyses are examined and archived quarterly.
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions. A vetinary examination was performed prior to commencement of treatment to ensure that the animals were in a good state of health.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 55
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Specific gravity: 0.8
- Pretreatment: The vehicle was pretreated by flushing nitrogen and dehydrated by the use of activated grains of molecular sieve (0.3 mM).
DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 5 ml/kg bw (dose volumes were calculated weekly according to the latest body weight)
DOSAGE PREPARATION
The prepared test substance was used within 48 hours after preparation and the formulation was prepared daily prior to dosing. The prepared test substance was weighed into a dry glass flask, previously flushed with nitrogen, on an analytical balance and the vehicle (w/w) was added. Adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle. Homogeneity of the test substance was obtained by shaking and using a magnetic stirrer. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of formulations prepared during weeks 1, 2, and 4, and post-treatment (same formulation procedures), were analysed to check stability, homogeneity, and accuracy of preparation.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily, approximately at the same time each day, 7 days per week
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 800 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on data from previous studies in rats.
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: At least once daily for 28 days. The time of onset, degree, and duration were recorded. Mortality/viability was recorded twice daily.
- Cage side observations checked: Clinical signs, mortality/viability
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly and on the day preceding termination, prior to overnight fasting.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes (subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation introduced as no effect was suspected)
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: during last week of treatment
- Dose groups that were examined: all animals
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: immediately prior to post mortem examination, between approximately 8.00 and 10.00 a.m.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (ether)
- Animals fasted: Yes (water was provided)
- How many animals: all animals
- Anti-coagulant: EDTA
- Parameters checked: Erythrocyte count (RBC), haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelet count (PLATELETS), red cell distribution width (RDW), total leucocyte count (WBC), differential leucocyte count: neutrophiles (SEG), eosinophiles (EO), basophiles (BASO), lymphocytes (LYMPH), monocytes (MONO)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: immediately prior to post mortem examination, between approximately 8.00 and 10.00 a.m.
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all animals
- Sample preperation: Serum samples were derived after clotting and centrifugation.
- Parameters checked: alanine aminotransferase (ALAT/GPT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT/GOT), bilirubin total (BILI T.), creatinine, glucose, urea, protein total (PROTEIN T.), protein albumin (ALBUMIN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), sodium (Na), potassium (K), chloride (Cl), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (INORG. PHOSPH)
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
- Adrenal glands, heart, kidneys, liver, spleen, stomach, testes, and all gross lesions
ORGAN WEIGHTS: Yes
- Adrenal glands, heart, kidneys, liver, spleen, and testes - Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyse the body weight, organ weights, and clinical laboratory data:
Univariate one-way analysis of variance was used to assess the significance of intergroup differences. If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test (many-to-one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups groups and the control groups. The Steel-test (many-one rank test) was applied when the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution. All tests were two-sided and in all cases p < 0.05 was accepted as the lowes level of significance. Group means were calculated for continous data and medians were calculated for discrete data (scores). The exact Fisher-test was applied to the ophthalmoscopic examination data. - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- mortality: one male of the 800 mg/kg bw dose group on day 13; clinical signs: rough coat and hunched posture at 800 mg/kg bw
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- mortality: one male of the 800 mg/kg bw dose group on day 13; clinical signs: rough coat and hunched posture at 800 mg/kg bw
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Haemorrhage in the thymus only was detected in the male rat of the 800 mg/kg bw dose group that died on day 13. A relation with treatment cannot be excluded. No further treatment related alterations were found in any of the surviving animals.
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
One male receiving 800 mg/kg bw/day of the test item was found dead on day 13 of the study. No further mortalities occurred during the study period.
Changes in clinical appearance that were considered to be of toxicological significance were rough coat and hunched posture. Rough coat and hunched posture were noted among 4 males receiving 800 mg/kg bw/day of the test item during weeks 3 and/or 4 of the treatment period. Excessive salivation was noted among treated and control animals showing a dose-related increase in incidence. However, this finding is frequently noted in rats of this age and strain following oral treatment of a xenobiotic agent. The increase among treated animals may be the result of a bad taste or possible irritant effect of the dosing formulation. Therefore no toxicological significance was attached to this finding. Other findings that were noted included alopecia, scabs, and chromodacryorrhoea. The incidence and severity of these changes were considered to be within normal biological variation for animals of this age and strain.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Body weights and body weight gain of treated animals were considered not to differ from those of the controls over the 4 week study period. A statistically significant increase in body weights of males receiving 50 mg/kg bw/day of the test item, when compared to control males, was considered not to represent a change of toxicological significance.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
There were no differences in food consumption before or after allowance for body weight between treated and control animals.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION
There were no ophthalmoscopic findings at week 4 that could be attributed to treatment with the test material. Focal corneal opacity and chromodacryorrhoea, both observed in one male treated with 50 mg/kg bw/day, were considered not to represent clear signs of toxicity as the incidence and severity were within normal biological limits.
HAEMATOLOGY
Haematological parameters of treated rats were considered not to have been affected by treatment.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
There were no differences noted between control and treated rats that could be related to treatment with the test item. Values in treated males achieving statistical significance when compared to controls were considered not to represent toxicological significance as they remained within the range of variation normally seen for untreated animals of this age and strain (ALAT) or were not supported by any corroborative change in other parameters examined (ALBUMIN).
ORGAN WEIGHTS
Organ weights and relative organ weights of treated animals were considered to be indistinguishable from those of control animals.
GROSS PATHOLOGY
Macroscopic examination of surviving animals at necropsy did not reveal any alterations that were considered to be treatment-related. Macroscopic examination at necropsy of the one male of the 800 mg/kg bw dose group, which was found dead on day 13 of the study, revealed a haemorrhage in the thymus only.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
There were no microscopic findings noted that were considered to be treatment related. The small number of changes recorded in treated animals were within the range commonly seen for rats of this age and strain. The thymic haemorrhage, noted in the animal which was found dead, was confirmed at microscopic examination. However, no further histopathological evidence was obtained in the study as to the mode of death of this animal. - Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 800 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: mortality: one male of the 800 mg/kg bw dose group on day 13; clinical signs: rough coat and hunched posture at 800 mg/kg bw; macroscopic and microscopic evaluation: haemorrhage in thymus in the male that died
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No biologically relevant or treatment related changes in dosed animals as compared to control animals were observed.
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The test item was tested for toxicity after repeated oral exposure in a subacute 28-day repeated dose toxicity study according to the OECD TG 407 and in compliance with GLP. After gavage of the test material up to 150 mg/kg bw/day no treatment related effects were observed. Gavage of 800 mg/kg bw/day revealed rough coat and hunched posture in male rats. One male rat was found dead on day 13 of the study; macroscopic and microscopic pathology revealed haemorrhage in the thymus only. Based on this data, the LOAEL for males was set at 800 mg/kg bw/day, and the NOEL for both males and females was found to be 150 mg/kg bw/day.
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Expected completion date: 29 September 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 21 September 1998
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Additional reproductive endpoints are covered.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Bayerisches Landesamt für Geshundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- Crl: WI(Han) (Full Barrier)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: 7-8 weeks old
- Housing: caged in IVC cages (type IV, polysulphone cages) on Altromin saw fibre bedding
- Diet: free access to Altromin 1324 maintenance diet for rats and mice
- Water: free access to tap water, sulphur acidified to a pH of approximately 2.8 (drinking water, municipal residue control, microbiological controls at regular intervals)
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- DMSO
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test item formulation was prepared at least once every 7 days based on available stability data.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Based on the test item’s characteristics (hydrolysis in water) and poor miscibility with the standard vehicles corn oil, olive oil or paraffin oil.
- Concentration in vehicle: 100%
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 2 mL/kg bw
- Lot/batch no. (if required): SZBF0910V and SZBG1310 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- General homogeneity and stability of the test item in the vehicle was investigated before the start of the study at Evonik Technology & Infrastructure GmbH, Paul-Baumann-Str. 1, 45772 Marl, Germany. Samples for homogeneity analysis were taken from the top, middle and bottom of a low dose (50 mg/mL) and a high dose formulation (500 mg/mL). For determination of the concentration of test item in dosing formulations, samples will be retained from all groups in weeks 1, 5, 9 and in the last week of treatment (16 samples in total). In weeks 1, 5 and in the last week of treatment, samples for the testing of homogeneity will be taken from the top, middle and bottom of the freshly prepared low and high dose formulations (18 samples in total). The quantitative determination of the Si-content and the corresponding calculated concentration of the test item in the dosing formulations will be performed by means of ISP-OES analysis by Evonik Technology & Infrastructure GmbH in a separate stand-alone study in accordance with GLP.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 animals/sex for each dose group.
second control group (C2) and recovery groups: 5 animals/sex - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: According to the results of a previous dose range finding study and in consultation with the sponsor the following doses 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were selected for the 3 dose groups (LD = low dose, MD = medium dose, HD = high dose).
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: Two control groups were used in this study. C1, the vehicle control group was administered daily with 100 % DMSO. To control for possible vehicle-related effects a second control group was used. C2 is a second control group treated daily with aqua ad injectionem. As 100 % DMSO is not a standard vehicle in toxicity studies and as no historical control data exists for this vehicle, it could not be excluded that vehicle-related effects could be induced for parameters such as body weight, food consumption, blood parameters, organ weights or microscopic organ findings. A negative control group treated with aqua ad injectionem was used to better allow for discrimination between possible vehicle-induced effects or toxicologically relevant effects related to the test item in the dose groups. Therefore, for evaluation of data, results of both control groups were compared in the first place to check for statistically and biologically significant differences. Without relevant differences, statistical assessment of the results of the different parameters of the dose groups was only related to the vehicle control group C1. The animals in the vehicle control group (C1) were handled in an identical manner to the test group subjects and received 100 % DMSO using the same volume as used for the dose groups. The animals in the control group C2 were handled in an identical manner to the test group subjects and received aqua ad injectionem at an application volume of 2 mL/kg bw.
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: 28 days for control (C1) and high dose group - Positive control:
- not applicable
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: General clinical observations were made at least once a day, preferably at the same time each day. The health condition of the animals was recorded. Twice daily all animals were observed for morbidity and mortality except on weekends and public holidays when observations were made once daily.
- Cage side observations included: spontaneous activity, lethargy, recumbent position, convulsions, tremors, apnoea, asphyxia, vocalisation, diarrhoea, changes in skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes (salivation, discharge), piloerection and pupil size
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: body weight was recorded once before the assignment to the experimental groups, on the first day of administration and weekly during the treatment and recovery period.
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: before the first administration and in the last week of the treatment period as well as at the end of the recovery period in the recovery animals
- Dose groups that were examined: all animals
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at the end of the treatment and recovery period prior to or as part of the sacrifice of the animals
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Not specified
- Animals fasted: Yes for treatment groups, No for recovery groups
- Parameters checked in tables 1 and 2 were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at the end of the treatment and recovery period prior to or as part of the sacrifice of the animals
- Animals fasted: Yes for treatment groups, no for recovery groups
- Parameters checked in table 3 were examined.
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: prior to or as part of the sacrifice of the animals at the end of the treatment and the recovery period
- Animals fasted: Not specified
- Parameters checked in table 4 were examined.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once before the first exposure and once in the last week of exposure as well as in the last week of the recovery period
- Dose groups that were examined: all dose groups
- Battery of functions tested: Sensory reactivity to different modalities, grip strength and motor activity assessments and other behavioral observations as well as rearing supported and not supported, urination, defecation, startle/ auditory response, equilibrium reflex, positional passivity, visual placing, fore and hind limb grip strength, tail pinch response, toe pinch reflex, extensor thrust/limb tone, hind limb reflex, righting reflex on the ground, air righting reflex, pupil response, body temperature and ophthalmoscopy (anterior chamber of the eye and fundus of eye).
IMMUNOLOGY: No
OTHER: Daily over a period of 8 days, the estrous cycle of all female animals was examined in study week 5, 9 and the last week of treatment. In the recovery animals the estrous cycle was also examined during the last week of the recovery period.
At necropsy (one day after the last administration) and at the end of the recovery period, left epididymis and left testis were separated and used for evaluation of sperm parameters. Epididymal sperm motility and testicular sperm count were evaluated in all male animals using Hamilton Thorne Sperm Analyser (TOX IVOS Version 13.0). - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 5)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 6) - Statistics:
- A statistical assessment of the results of the body weight, food consumption, parameters of hematology, blood coagulation and clinical biochemistry and absolute and relative organ weights and sperm analysis will be performed for each gender by comparing values of dosed with control animals using either a parametric one-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Dunnett Test or a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis Test and a post-hoc Dunn’s Test, based on the results of homogeneity and normality tests. Furthermore, statistical comparisons of data acquired during the recovery period may be performed with a Student’s t-Test or Mann-Whitney U-Test when appropriate. These statistics will be performed with Ascentos 1.1.3 software or GraphPad Prism V.6.01 software (p<0.05 is considered as statistically significant).
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Abnormal breathing was noted in 1/15 males and 1/15 females of the vehicle control group C1, 1/10 males and 3/10 females of the LD group, 4/10 males and 5/10 females of the MD group and 7/15 males and 1/15 females of the HD group during the treatment period. There was no clear dose-dependent pattern. In some animals this clinical sign was only noted for some days of treatment whereas others were affected up to terminal sacrifice or until inter-current death or sacrifice. In some cases occurrence of abnormal breathing lead to reduced health condition with clinical signs such as reduced spontaneous activity. Abnormal breathing did not persist throughout the recovery period. As animals from all groups (including controls) were affected by abnormal breathing, the sudden appearance of this clinical sign at various time points during the treatment period was considered to be related to local effects of the vehicle DMSO and/or its formulation with the test item based on e.g. regurgitation and incidental aspiration after dose administration. Therefore, abnormal breathing was not considered to be related to a systemic toxic effect of the test item.
During the treatment period of the study, dose-dependently increased salivation was noted transiently in some weeks and some males and females mainly of the MD and the HD group when compared to the respective controls. Statistical significance was achieved in week 2 (female main HD group), week 3 (male main HD group, female recovery HD group), week 4 (male main HD group), week 5 (male and female main HD group, male recovery HD group), week 6 (male main HD group) and week 10 (female main HD group).
Spontaneous activity was noted to be slightly, dose-dependently lower in the male and female MD and HD group when compared to the respective controls C1. Statistical significance was achieved in week 2 (male and female main HD group), week 3 (male MD group, male main HD group and male recovery HD group), week 4 (male main HD group), week 5 (male main HD group), week 6 (male main HD group) and week 8 (female MD group). As this was only seen transiently in some weeks of the treatment period without relevant impact on other parameters like food consumption and as there were no statistically or biologically significant differences during the recovery period, it was not considered as an adverse effect.
Statistical but not biological significance was achieved for the female LD group for reduced reaction to finger approach in week 9 and for the female recovery HD group for reduced response to handling in week 8 when compared to the respective controls C1. Further slight but statistically significant differences between the groups for sleeping or moving in the cage during cage-side observation in few weeks irrespective of the treatment group were not considered as toxicologically relevant but incidental. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Mortality was observed in all groups except the water control group C2 and during recovery phase. Most deaths occurred in the higher dose groups though no clear pattern in terms of dose-dependency or duration of treatment was observed.
vehicle control: 1 female (no 103) found dead (sudden death related to misgavaging)
low dose: 2 males (no 020 and 017) found dead (related to inadvertent misgavaging), 1 female (no 078) was intercurrently sacrificed on day 80 for animal welfare reasons based on a tissue mass of approx. 2.5 cm in diameter on its left cheek which prove to be a spontaneous adenocarcinoma at histopathology
mid dose: female no. 085 was found dead on day 42 after showing abnormal breathing for few days as well as slight loss of body weight. Furthermore, female no. 081, 087 and 089 were euthanised on the respective treatment day 15, 43 and 55 in a moribund condition with clinical signs such as abnormal breathing, reduced spontaneous activity and piloerection. Female no. 089 was additionally seen with a bloated belly (related to a gas filled stomach) and dehydration at sacrifice.
high dose: Two males were found dead without any preceding signs of morbidity (no. 036 on day 47 and no. 055 on day 62). Furthermore, male no. 044 was found dead on day 64 after moderate loss of body weight and male no. 037 was found dead on day 40 after showing abnormal breathing and piloerection one day before. Male no. 039 was euthanised on day 45 in a moribund condition due to gasping. Two females of the HD group were also found dead without any preceding signs of morbidity (no. 094 on day 69 and no. 110 on day 81) and female no. 095 was found dead on day 15 after moderate loss of body weight. - Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Marginal but statistically significant differences in mean body weight between the male control groups C1 and C2 were seen on treatment day 15, 22, 29 and 43 (4 to 7% above group C1). Due to the transiency and the marginal difference this was not considered as biologically relevant. Accordingly slightly but statistically significantly higher body weight gain was noted in the 5th week of treatment for the male C2 group. No such effects were seen in the female control groups except for statistically significantly higher body weight gain in the very first week in the female C2 group when compared to C1 which was considered as incidental.
Few slight but statistically significant differences for body weight change between the dose groups and the respective control group C1 in single weeks of treatment and recovery without consistency were considered as incidental in nature (males: slightly higher body weight gain in week 2 and 5 of the MD group, in week 5 of the main HD group and in week 9 of the recovery HD group; marginal body weight loss in week 16 of the recovery HD group; females: slightly higher body weight gain in week 3, week 7 and week 10 of the female recovery HD group when compared to the respective controls.) - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Single statistically significant effects were only seen in either males or females and were considered as incidental as values were within the normal range of variation (males: percentage lymphocytes 8% below controls C1, percentage neutrophils 32% above controls C1; females: MCV 4% below controls C1, MCHC 3% above controls C1, percentage monocytes 62% above controls C1). At the end of the recovery period, no toxicologically relevant effect on parameters of hematology was observed. The isolated but statistically significant change of higher percentage of eosinophils in the male HD group (138% above controls) and higher percentage of large unstained cells in the male HD group (34% above controls) was not observed in females or at the end of the treatment period and was considered as incidental.
Blood coagulation was not affected by the test item. Marginally but statistically significantly higher value for prothrombin time in the male HD group at the end of the treatment period (13% above controls C1) was not seen in females or at the end of the recovery period and was considered as incidental with values within the normal range of variation. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Statistically significant changes were observed in the male MD group when compared to the respective controls C1 which did not follow a dose-dependent pattern (ASAT 16%, albumin 6% and TBA 44% below controls C1). Mean value for alkaline phosphatase was statistically significantly below controls in the male HD group (43% below controls C1) and the female HD group (43% below controls C1) but within the normal range of variation. Furthermore, slightly but statistically significantly lower mean values for creatinine (25% below controls) and for urease (19% below controls) were seen in the female HD group at the end of the treatment period when compared to the respective control group C1. No such finding was seen in males. Though statistically significant, these single findings in males and/or females at the end of the treatment period within the normal range of variation and without histopathological correlate in the related organs (except adaptive liver hypertrophy in the male HD group) were not assumed to be adverse in nature.
At the end of the recovery period, slight to moderate, statistically significant effects were seen in the male HD group (lower ALAT, AP, creatinine, total protein and albumin when compared to controls C1). As no such effect was seen in females and values were within the normal range of variation, these statistically significant differences were not considered as toxicologically relevant. There was no histopathological correlate. No statistically significant changes were noted in females at the end of the recovery period. - Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the functional observation battery, slight differences between the groups before initiation of treatment were considered as incidental in nature such as slightly but statistically significantly higher number of defecation in the male main HD group and marginally but statistically significantly lower body temperature in the male LD and MD group.
As seen during the clinical observations, increased salivation was also noted dose-dependently in males and females in the functional observation battery at the end of the treatment period with achieving statistical significance in the male main HD group and the male recovery HD group when compared to the respective controls C1. This was not observed during the recovery period.
The isolated findings of statistically significantly less number of females moving in the cage in all main dose groups during cage-side observation and statistically significantly lower number of non-supported rearing (but not of supported rearing) compared to controls C1 at the end of the treatment period was considered as incidental. Furthermore, marginally but statistically significantly lower body temperature of the female main dose groups at the end of the treatment period was considered as incidental and was within the normal range of variation. No such differences to controls were seen at the end of the recovery period. - Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At the end of the treatment period, no effects of toxicological relevance were observed on organ weights. For males and females, there were no statistically significant differences between the dose groups and the control group C1 except slightly and not dose-dependently lower ovaries weight in the MD group (absolute weight 38% below controls C1). With values being in the normal range of variation, this was considered as incidental.
At the end of the recovery period, no effects of toxicological relevance were observed on organ weights. For males and females, there were no statistically significant differences between the dose groups and the control group C1 except marginally lower absolute testes weight (11% below controls C1) in the HD group. Without an effect at the end of the treatment period and without related effects on fertility parameters at the end of the treatment and at the end of the recovery period, this marginal weight difference was not considered as toxicologically relevant. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Few gross pathological changes were recorded at necropsy at the end of the treatment and the recovery period without following a dose-dependent pattern. Some more findings were seen in intercurrently sacrificed or found dead animals.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Under the conditions of this study, the test item caused minor systemic effects. They consisted of hepatocellular hypertrophy in single males of the LD, MD and HD group. There were no further findings recorded in the livers. No hepatocellular hypertrophy was observed at the end of the recovery period. Therefore, this finding was not considered to be of adverse but adaptive nature.
In three animals (no. 017, 020 and 103), there were morphological indications for misgavage consisting of necrotizing inflammation in the trachea and/or larynx. In further five animals (no. 037, 039, 085, 087 and 089), inflammatory secretion and acute inflammation in the nasal cavities indicated regurgitation. All these cases are deemed to be related to the study methods and/or the consistency of the vehicle (100 % DMSO) and the test item.
In one case, there was a finding of an adenocarcinoma in the mandibular gland of a female. Such findings are rare spontaneous incidents, however have been reported previously.
In male no. 055, there were hemorrhage in the heart (moderate) and thymus (slight), associated with a chronic peri-/arteritis (severe) in the stomach. The peri-/arteritis may be of considered of spontaneous background. The reason for the aforementioned hemorrhages is unknown but may be related to the peri-/arteritis. Such lesions may be encountered in control rats as spontaneous background lesions.
The cause of morbidity/death could not be established in two females (no. 081 and 110) based on the morphological evaluation. Furthermore, no diagnose was made due to cannibalism and/or autolysis in two females (no. 094 and 095) and two males (no. 036 and 044). However, based on the observed sudden spontaneous death without preceding morbidity in these animals, these mortalities were also assumed to be related to oral gavaging of formulations with DMSO and its acute local effects after possible regurgitation and incidental aspiration. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no biologically or statistically significant differences for epididymal sperm motility and testicular sperm count between the treated and control animals.
Reaction product of trimethoxysilylpropylethylenediamine and benzylchloride had no statistically or biologically significant effect on the estrous cycle evaluated 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the first administration and in the last week of the recovery period. There were no considerable, consistent differences in the length or sequence of cycle stages between the dose groups and the control group. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed up to highest dose tested
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Referenceopen allclose all
Tab. 1: Clinical biochemistry summary of male rats after 4 weeks
|
control |
50 mg/kg bw |
150 mg/kg bw |
800 mg/kg bw |
|
ALAT(GPT) ukat/l |
Mean |
0.66 |
0.58 |
0.55 * |
0.69 |
SD |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
|
ALBUMIN g/l |
Mean |
31 |
30 |
30 |
28 ** |
SD |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
ALAT(GPT) = alanine aminotransferase
* / ** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significance at 5% or 1% level.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises adequate, reliable (Klimisch score 1) and consistent studies, and is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII-IX, 8.6, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A 28 -day repeated dose oral toxicity study is available to assess the repeated dose toxicity of the reaction mass containing six benzylated amine silanes (NOTOX, 1993f). In the study according to OECD 407 (adopted 1981) and in compliance with GLP, male and female Wistar rats (5 per sex and dose group) were treated with 50, 150 and 800 mg/kg bw test substance by oral gavage for 28 days. One male of the high dose group was found dead on day 13. No further mortality was observed. Changes in clinical appearance that were considered to be of toxicological significance were rough coat and hunched posture in the high dose group. Body weight, body weight gains, and food consumption were considered not to differ from those of the controls over the 4 week study period. In addition, no effects on haematology, clinical chemistry, and organ weights were observed. No treatment-related effects were observed during pathology and histopathology investigations. In conclusion a NOAEL of 150 mg/kg bw was deduced. A LOAEL of 800 mg/kg bw can be deduced, based on the mortality of 1/5 male in the high dose group and the occurrence of 2/6 deaths within the preliminary study at a dose of 1000 mg/kg bw, indicating that the mortality and the clinical signs could be treatment-related.
A 90 -day repeated dose oral toxicity study is available to assess the repeated dose toxicity of the reaction mass containing six benzylated amine silanes (Eurofins, 2017). In this study conducted according to OECD 408 and in compliance with GLP, male and female Wistar rats were administered 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day of the test substance by oral gavage. For the control group and the high dose group 5 additional animals per sex were treated for 90 days but left untreated for an extra 28 days (recovery period). Animals of two control groups were handled identically as the dose groups. Control group (C1), the vehicle control group, was administered daily with 100 % DMSO. To control for possible vehicle-related effects a second control group (C2) was used which was treated daily with aqua ad injectionem. No adverse systemic effects of the test substance were found up to the highest dose level tested. The clinical sign of abnormal breathing was observed at various time points during the treatment period without a clear dose-dependent pattern in all dose groups as well as in the vehicle control group dosed with 100% DMSO. The sudden appearance of this clinical sign in animals irrespective of the group was considered to be related to local effects of the vehicle DMSO and/or its formulation with the test item based on, e.g., regurgitation and incidental aspiration after dose administration. Abnormal breathing did not persist throughout the recovery period and did not appear in this period. Likewise, early death of animals irrespective of the treatment group during the treatment period was not related to systemic toxicity of the test item, but was mostly due to study procedures and/or the consistency of the vehicle and/or test item formulation (misgavage and regurgitation). Furthermore, in two cases early death was caused by spontaneous background lesions. Histologically, there was a minor incidence and severity of hepatocellular hypertrophy in single males from all dose groups at the end of the treatment period that was not associated with other findings. This finding was not observed at the end of the recovery period. Therefore, this finding was not considered to be of adverse but adaptive nature. Thus, the NOAEL in this study is considered to be 1000 mg/kg body weight/day.
Reliable 28 -day and 90 -day repeated dose toxicity studies by the oral route are available. Based on the findings from the recent sub-chronic repeated dose toxicity study with reaction mass containing six benzylated amine silanes it is not expected that the mortality observed in the sub-acute study at the highest dose of 800 mg/kg bw was treatment related. Therefore, the sub-chronic study was chosen as the key study for risk assessment of the registered substance.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on repeated dose toxicity of the reaction mass containing six benzylated amine silanes do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation 1272/2008 or EU Directive 67/548/EEC, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.