Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Local effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Route of original study:
Oral
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

As the most likely route is considered to be via oral, a DNEL for inhalation/dermal route is also unnecessary to be derived.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Local effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.67 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
no route to route extrapolation
AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL is used as a starting point.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
DNEL is based on dermal 28-day study.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Rats are used in the animal study.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
No substance-specific data is available.
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
For general population, a default AF of 10 is to be used.
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
A guideline test with GLP principle is used for assessment.
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
No other uncertainties needed to be considered.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.67 mg/kg bw/day
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

There is no available toxicity data concerning testsubstance on human.

As the most likely route is considered to be via oral, a DNEL for inhalation/dermal route is also unnecessary to be derived. Detailed data of test article through oral route is available. A subacute study (NOTOX project 488231, 2008) following OECD Guideline 422 with GLP showed thatnotreatment-related toxicoiogically significant changes were noted in any of the parameters (i.e. mortality, clinical appearance, functional observations, body weight, food consumption, clinical laboratory investigations, macroscopic examination, organ weights, microscopic examination, reproduction, breeding and pup development) investigated in this study.Based upon the current animal data, NOAEL value of 1000mg/kg/day far exceed consumer exposure levels is used to derive the DNEL of test substance on oral toxicity for general population.