Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation: In vivo, Small white russian rabbit (OECD TG 404, GLP): not irritant to rabbit skin, no corrosive effects

Eye irritation: In vivo, Small white russian rabbit (OECD TG 405, GLP): irritating to eyes (Category 2 according to EU labelling regulation)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1995-04-24 - 1995-05-08 (experimental phase)
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well-documented study conducted under GLP according to OECD guideline 404 on the registered substance itself without deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: small white Russian, Chbb:HM, SPF
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Bred by: Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH, Chemisch-Pharmazeutische Fabrik, 88400 Biberach an der Riss 1, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: Animal 1: 2.6 kg, Animal 2: 2.4 kg, Animal 3: 2.6 kg
- Housing: conventional, singly in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ssniff K 4 complete feed for rabbits ad libitum, supplied by Ssniff, Spezialfutter GmbH, 59494 Soest, Germany. The manufacturer carries out regular tests on the feed.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Drinking water ad libitum, supplied by Gelsenwasser, Wasserwerk, 45721 Haltern, Germany. Samples of the tap water are tested in-house each quarter.
- Acclimation period: at least 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20±3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hour light/dark rhythm (artificial light)
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
other: The animals were shorn dorsally using a shearing apparatus for small animals (Aesculap Favorita II, shearing head GT 730, cutting height 1/2 mm).
Remarks:
Only healthy animals whose skin was intact after shearing were used for the test.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 cm3 test material / 6 cm2 of skin
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
13 d
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6cm² dorsal skin
- Type of wrap if used: The area of application was covered with a gauze. This area was then covered with a non-irritant plaster and held in place for 4 hours using a semiocclusive dressing.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): with warm water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
(indicate if minutes, hours or days)
The irritant effect was assessed 30-60 minutes, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patch, and after 7, 9 and 13 days.

SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: Draize-grading
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.89
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 13 d
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
2.33
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 13 d
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
7 d
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 13 d
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
7 d
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 13 d
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 13 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 13 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
After exposure to the test item for 4 hours, and 30 to 60 minutes after removal of the patch there was found to be erythema of the skin which was very slight in two animals and well-defined in one animal. Two animals showed slight oedema, and one animal showed very slight oedema.
After 24 hours, erythema was well-defined in two animals and still very slight in one animal. Oedema was very slight to moderate. After 48 and 72 hours, all the animals had well-defined erythema and slight oedema.
After 7 days, all the animals showed very slight erythema and oedema. After 9 days, the skin of one animal still showed very slight erythema and oedema.
After 13 days, all the animals were free of signs of skin irritation in the area of application. Accordingly, test item is not a skin irritant.
Other effects:
- Other adverse local effects: After 7 and 9 days, all the animals were scaling and the skin surface showed detachment.
Interpretation of results:
other: EU GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The study was performed according to the OECD TG404 without deviations and therefore considered to be of the highest quality (reliability Klimisch 1). The validity criteria of the test system are fulfilled. The test material produced an average irritation index of 1.89 for erythema and eschar formation and an average irritation index of 2.0. for oedema formation 24, 48 and 72 hours after the end of exposure. After 13 days, all the animals were free of signs of irritation. Therefore, the test material was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
Executive summary:

A study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material Trimethyl orthoacetate (TMOA) to the skin of small white russian rabbits. The method used followed the recommendations of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 404 "Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion" (adopted 17 July 1992) and Method B4 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (which constitutes Annex V of Council Directive 67/548/EEC). The test was carried out by exposing three animals to the substance for 4 hours. The test showed that dermal application of the liquid test substance with a semiocclusive dressing resulted in well-defined erythema in two animals, and very slight erythema in one animal, after 24 hours. At this time, the animals showed very slight to moderate oedema. After 48 and 72 hours, all the animals were found to have well-defined erythema and slight oedema. After 7 days, all the animals showed very slight erythema and very slight oedema, together with scaling. After 9 days, one animal still showed very slight erythema and very slight oedema. All the animals still showed scaling. After 13 days, all the animals were free of signs of irritation.

The following averages were calculated from the numerically scored individual findings based on inspection 24, 48 and 72 hours after the end of exposure:

 

Exposure time 4 hours

Animal 1

Animal 2

Animal 3

Average

Erythema and eschar formation

2.00

2.00

1.67

1.89

Oedema

2.00

2.33

1.67

2.00

 

Since the test material produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 for erythema and oedema formation after 13 days, it was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted. Thus, the test material did not meet the criteria for classification as irritant or corrosive according to EU labelling regulations. No symbol and risk phrase are required.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1995-05-08 - 1995-05-19
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well-documented study conducted under GLP according to OECD guideline 405 on the registered substance itself without deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, No. 405, "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion" OECD 1992
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
EC Directive B.5. Acute toxicity (eye irritation); Appendix to Directive 92/69/EEC of the commission dated 31 July 1992 to the seventeenth amendment of Directive 67/548/EEC of the council for adaptation of the legal and administrative regulations for classification, packaging and labelling of hazardous substances to technical progress.
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: small white Russian, Chbb:HM, SPF
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Bred by Dr Karl Thomae GmbH, Chemische-Pharmazeutische Fabrik, 88400 Biberach an der Riss 1, Germany
- Age at study initiation: healthy adult animals
- Weight at study initiation: Animal 1: 2.4 kg, Animal 2: 2.8 kg, Animal 3: 2.6 kg
- Housing: conventional, singly in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ssniff K 4 complete feed for rabbits ad libitum, supplied by Ssniff, Spezialfutter GmbH, 59494 Soest, Germany. The manufacturer carries out regular tests on the feed.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Drinking water ad libitum, supplied by Gelsenwasser, Wasserwerk, 45721 Haltern, Germany. Samples of the tap water are tested in-house each quarter.
- Acclimation period: at least 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hour light/dark rhythm, artificial light
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): single dose of 0.1 cm3 of the liquid
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
10 days after administration of the test substance
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 6, 8 and 10 after administration of the test substance
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 animals
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): rinsed with warm physiological saline
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h after administration

SCORING SYSTEM:
Cornea
Opacity: degree of density (most dense area taken for reading)
No ulceration or opacity: 0
Scattered or diffuse area of opacity (except slight clouding of the normal brightness), details of the iris clearly visible: 1
Easily discernible translucent area, details of iris slightly obscured: 2
Opalescent areas, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible: 3
Opaque cornea: iris invisible due to the opacity: 4

Iris
Normal: 0
Unusually deep folds, congestion, swelling, slight circumcorneal hyperaemia or injection; one of these symptoms or a combination of the various symptoms; iris still reacts to light (sluggish reaction is positive): 1
No reaction to light, haemorrhage, gross destruction (one or all of these symptoms): 2

Conjunctivae
Redness: (most pronounced finding on palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae compared with untreated eye)
Blood vessels normal: 0
Some blood vessels show distinct hyperaemia (injection): 1
Diffuse crimson red colour, individual vessels not easily discernible: 2
Diffuse beefy red: 3

Chemosis: lids and/or nictitating membrane
No swelling: 0
Any swelling above normal (includes nictitating membrane): 1
Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids: 2
Swelling with lids about half closed: 3
Swelling with lids more than half closed: 4

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
conjunctival redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.11
Max. score:
2.33
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 10 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
Conjunctival swelling
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.11
Max. score:
1.33
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 10 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.89
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 10 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
In the test, all the animals showed pronounced defensive reactions on administration of TRIMETHYL ORTHOACETATE, and this was associated with vocalizations by one animal. One hour after administration, all the animals were found to have pronounced hyperaemia of some blood vessels, and conjunctival swelling was marked in two animals and slight in one animal. In addition, all the animals showed exudation and a decrease in the normal brightness of the cornea.
After 24 hours, the conjunctivae of the animals were a diffuse crimson red (some vessels were recognizable only with difficulty). This was associated with slight swelling in two animals and pronounced swelling in one animal. Slight corneal opacity was found in all the animals, while the fluorescein test showed clarification of more than one half and up to the entire surface. Two animals were still found to have exudation.
After 48 hours, the conjunctivae of two animals were found to have diffuse deep red discoloration together with bleeding, and one animal had diffuse crimson discolorations. The conjunctivae of all the animals were still slightly swollen. Exudation was found in one animal at this time. The cornea was slightly opaque in all the animals, and clarification ranged from spots up to 1/4 and, in one animal, up to the whole surface.
After 72 hours, the conjunctival discoloration in two animals had declined from diffuse deep red to diffuse crimson. One animal showed hyperaemia of some blood vessels. Two animals showed bleeding on the nictitating membrane and conjunctivae. Slight swelling was still found in all the animals. The cornea of two animals still showed slight opacity, with clarification of up to 1/4 of the surface, while there was no longer any corneal opacity in the third animal.
After 6 and 8 days there was still pronounced hyperaemia of some blood vessels in the conjunctivae of the three animals, and this was associated with slight swelling in one animal after 6 days. Two animals no longer had corneal opacity.
After 10 days, all the animals were free of signs of irritation of the eyes and mucosa.

The following averages were calculated from the individual scores assigned on inspection after 24, 48 and 72 hours: 

 

Animal 1

Animal 2

Animal 3

Average

Conjunctival redness

1.67

2.33

2.33

2.11

Conjunctival swelling

1.00

1.33

1.00

1.11

Iris

0

0

0

0

Cornea

1.00

1.00

0.67

0.89

 

Individual findings 

Time after admin.

1 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

Animal

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

Conjunctival redness

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

3

3

1

2

2

Conjunctival chemosis

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Iris

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cornea

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

Fluorescein test*

-

-

-

3

4

4

1

1

4

1

1

0

Exudation

x

x

x

 

x

x

 

x

 

 

 

 

Conjunctivae incl. lids and nictitating membrane with bleading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

x

x

 

x

x

Cornea:

Decrease in normal brightness

x

x

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iris:

Circumcorneal hyparaemia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iris:

Circumcorneal injection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Individual findings (continued)

Time after admin.

6 d

8 d

10 d

Animal

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

Conjunctival redness

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

Conjunctival chemosis

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cornea

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Fluorescein test*

0

0

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

Exudation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conjunctivae incl. lids and nictitating membrane with bleading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cornea:

Decrease in normal brightness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iris:

Circumcorneal hyparaemia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iris:

Circumcorneal injection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 * the area of clarification of the corneal surface after instillation of one drop of fluorescein Na (0.1%) is stated:

0= no clarification, 1 = spots up to 1/4, 2 = more than 1/4 to 1/2, 3 = more than 1/2 to 3/4, 4 = more than 3/4 to 4/4

 

Interpretation of results:
Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The study was performed according to the OECD TG405 without deviations and according to the good laboratory practice principles. Therefore, the study is considered to be of the highest quality (reliability Klimisch 1). The validity criteria of the test system are fulfilled. The test material induced reversible irritation on rabbit eyes. Accordingly, the test material Trimethyl orthoacetate (TMOA) was classified as irritating to the eyes (Category 2).
Executive summary:

The test substance Trimethyl orthoacetate (TMOA) was investigated for its potential to cause irritation in the rabbit eye and mucosa according to OECD TG 405 ("Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion" (adopted 24 February 1987) and Method B5 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (which constitutes Annex V of Council Directive 67/548/EEC)

0.1 ml of the liquid test substance was administered into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each of three male rabbits, the untreated eye served as control. After exposure for 24 hours, the eyes were washed out with warm physiological saline. Under the conditions of this experiment the test compound was found to cause irritation, when applied to the rabbit eye. After 10 days, the eyes and mucosa of all the animals were free of signs of irritation.

Accordingly, the test material meets the criteria for classification as irritating to eyes (Category 2) according to EU labelling regulations.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 table 3.3.2, a substance must be classified as Irritating to eyes (Category 2), if, when applied to the eye of an animal, a substance produces:

— at least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive response of:

 — corneal opacity ≥ 1 and/or

 — iritis ≥ 1, and/or

 — conjunctival redness ≥ 2 and/or

 — conjunctival oedema (chemosis) ≥ 2

— calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material, and which fully reverses within an observation period of 21 days. In the present study, conjunctival redness was 2.33 in two out of three animals, so the substance must be classifed as Eye Irr. Cat. 2.

According to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 table 3.2.2, a substance must be classified as Irritating to skin (Category 2), if i.a. the following criterion is met: Mean value of ≥ 2,3 - ≤ 4,0 for erythema/ eschar or for oedema in at least 2 of 3 tested animals from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal or, if reactions are delayed, from grades on 3 consecutive days after the onset of skin reactions. In the present study, this criterium was not met so the substance does not need to be classified.