Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-266-8 | CAS number: 105-06-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- secondary literature
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from secondary source
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- The reproductive toxicity study of test material
- Author:
- HPVIS
- Year:
- 2 018
- Bibliographic source:
- HPVIS ,2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA 870.3700
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Reproductive toxicity study of test material was performed on Charles River COBS CD rats.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- No data available
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-ethyltoluene
- EC Number:
- 210-761-2
- EC Name:
- 4-ethyltoluene
- Cas Number:
- 622-96-8
- Molecular formula:
- C9H12
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-ethyl-4-methylbenzene
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report):1-ethyl-4-methylbenzene- Molecular formula:C9H12- Molecular weight :120.194 g/mol - Substance type:Organic
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data available
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Details on test animals and env. conditionsTEST ANIMALS- Age at study initiation: 12 weeks old- Acclimation period: 13 days
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Remarks:
- Mazola corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- Details on exposurePREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:The appropriate amount of test material was added to 50 ml of the vehicle, Mazola corn oil, and mixed by hand to ensure a homogeneous mixture. The test substance was prepared fresh dailyDIET PREPARATION- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):No data available- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food )- Storage temperature of food: No data availableVEHICLE- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): test material dissolved in , Mazola corn oil- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 25, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day. - Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 ml/kg- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available- Purity: No data available
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage:1:1 - Length of cohabitation: - Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy:The day that evidence of mating was detected was designated day 0 of gestation . - After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility. - Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)] - After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): - Any other deviations from standard protocol:
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 20 days ( from day 6 through day 19 )
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- No data available
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- 0, 25, 100, 200mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total:1000 mg/kg bw/day:2525mg/kg bw/day:25100mg/kg bw/day:25200 mg/kg bw/day:25
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Positive control:
- No data available
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Parental animals observation and examinationsCAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: yes DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes Time schedule: They were observed daily for mortality and clinical signs of toxicityBODY WEIGHT: YesTime schedule for examinations: Individual maternal body weights were recorded on gestation days 0, 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20.FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes Food consumption was determined weekly. Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: : No data availableCompound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes / No / No data: No data availableWATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data Time schedule for examinations:
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- No data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- No data available
- Litter observations:
- All fetuses were individually weighed and examined for external malformations and variations, including the palate and eyes.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Postmortem examinations (Parent Animal)SACRIFICE: A Cesarean section was performed on each female on gestation day 20 immediately following sacrifice by carbon dioxide inhalation.GROSS NECROPSY: The thoracic and abdominal cavities and organs of the dams were examined for grossly evident morphological changes and the carcasses discardedHISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTSThe tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively.: macroscopic examination was performed
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE - The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals and all F2 offspring were sacrificed at [#?] days of age. - These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination) as follows: GROSS NECROPSY: yes - Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations .] HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS: yes Approximately one-half of the fetuses were placed in Bouin's fixative for subsequent visceral examination by razor blade sectioning. The remaining one-half of the fetuses were fixed in alcohol, macerated in potassium hydroxide, and stained with Alizarin Red S for subsequent skeletal examination
- Statistics:
- All statistical analyses compared the treatment groups to the control group with the level of significance at p<0.0l and p<0.05. The male to female fetal sex distribution and the number of litters with malformations were compared using the Chi-square test criterion with Yates' correction for 2 x 2 contingency tables and/or Fisher's exact probability tests to judge significance of differences. The number of early resorptions and postimplantation losses were compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test. The mean number of viable fetuses, total implantations, corpora lutea, and mean fetal body weights were compared by ANOVA, Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variances and Dunnett's multiple comparison tables to judge significance of differences
- Reproductive indices:
- No data available
- Offspring viability indices:
- No data available
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Hair loss (primarily of the limbs and abdomen) occurred with similar frequency in all treatment and control groups at various intervals throughout the treatment period.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- Survival was 100% in the control and all treated groups.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no biologically meaningful differences in mean maternal body weight gain throughout the entire gestation period in any treated group when compared to controls
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no biologically meaningful or statistically significant differences in the mean numbers of corpora lutea, total implantations, early resorptions, postimplantation loss, viable fetuses,A slight increase in mean postimplantation loss was observed in the 25 mg/kg/day group when compared to controls. However, no dose-related trend was evident and this response was considered to be due to a random occurrence. Mean postimplantation loss number for 0, 25, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day was 13, 29, 19, and 19, respectively.Non viables and late resorptions were not observed in the control or in any of the treated groups
Effect levels (P0)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects on reproductive performance
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- no effects observed in mean fetal body weight in any of the treated groups when compared to the control group
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no biologically meaningful or statistically significant differences in the number of litters with malformations in any of the treated groups compared to controls. Microphthalmia and thoracoschisis each occurred in one fetus in one litter in the 25 and 200 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. Scoliosis was observed in one litter from both of the 200 mg/kg/day and control groups. The number of litters (and fetuses) with genetic and developmental variations in the treated groups was comparable to controls.
- Histopathological findings:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects on developmental parameters
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- other: not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for reproductive and developmental was considered to be 200mg/kg/day. When female CD 1rats were treated with test material orally
- Executive summary:
The reproductive and developmental toxicity study of test material was performed in Pregnant Charles River COBS CD rats. Dosage levels of 25, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day were administered orally by gavage as a single daily dose on days 6 through 19 of gestation at a constant volume of 5 ml/kg.The control group received the vehicle only, Mazola corn oil, on a comparable regimen.One female and one male rat of the same strain and source were placed together for mating. The occurrence of copulation was determined by daily inspection for a copulatory plug. The day that evidenice of mating was detected was designated day 0 of gestation and the female was returned to an individual cage.Dams were observed daily for mortality and clinical signs of toxicity .Individual maternal body weights were recorded on gestation days 0, 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20. A Cesarean section was performed on each female on gestation day 20 immediately following sacrifice by carbon dioxide inhalation. The uterus was excised and weighed prior to removal of the fetuses. The number and location of viable and nonviable fetuses, early and late resorptions, total implantations and corpora lutea were recorded. The thoracic and abdominal cavities and organs of the dams were examined for grossly evident morphological changes and the carcasses discarded. Uteri from females that appeared nongravid were opened and placed in 10% ammonium sulfide solution for confirmation of pregnancy status. All fetuses were individually weighed and examined for external malformations and variations, including the palate and eyes. Each fetus was externally sexed and individually numbered and tagged for identification. Approximately one-half of the fetuses were placed in Bouin's fixative for subsequent visceral examination by razor blade sectioning. The remaining one-half of the fetuses were fixed in alcohol, macerated in potassium hydroxide, and stained with
Alizarin Red S for subsequent skeletal examination.
There were no biologically meaningful differences in the appearance or behavior of the rats in the 25, 100, or 200 mg/kg/day groups when compared to controls. Hair loss (primarily of the limbs and abdomen) occurred with similar frequency in all treatment and control groups at various intervals throughout the treatment period. Survival was 100% in the control and all treated groups. There were no biologically meaningful differences in mean maternal body weight gain throughout the entire gestation period in any treated group when compared to controls. There were no biologically meaningful or statistically significant differences in the mean numbers of corpora lutea, total implantations, early resorptions, postimplantation loss, viable fetuses, the fetal sex distribution or mean fetal body weight in any of the treated groups when compared to the control group. Non viables and late resorptions were not observed in the control or in any of the treated groups. A slight increase in mean postimplantation loss was observed in the 25 mg/kg/day group when compared to controls. However, no dose-related trend was evident and this response was considered to be due to a random occurrence. Mean postimplantation loss number for 0, 25, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day was 13, 29, 19, and 19, respectively.
There were no biologically meaningful or statistically significant differences in the number of litters with malformations in any of the treated groups compared to controls. Microphthalmia and thoracoschisis each occurred in one fetus in one litter in the 25 and 200 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. Scoliosis was observed in one litter from both of the 200 mg/kg/day and control groups. The number of litters (and fetuses) with genetic and developmental variations in the treated groups was comparable to controls. Hence No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for reproductive and developmental was considered to be 200mg/kg/day.When femaleCD 1rats were treated withtest materialorally.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.