Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Description of key information

There is no indication of toxicity to fertility based on the available data. The NOEL for systemic effects was 500 mg/kg B.W., the highest dose tested, for both sexes in a sub-actute toxicity study. Local irritation of gastric mucosa was observed in the sub-acute toxicity study at 150 mg/kg B.W. leading to a local NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect-level) of 50 mg/kg B.W. for male and female rats for N-Phenyl-N-[(trichloromethyl)thio]benzenesulphonamide after 4-week daily oral treatment by gavage. There is no indication of adverse effects on the reproductive organs in this study. In the developmental toxicity study reported below, there is no indication of maternal or developmental toxicity up to the high dose tested. Overall, there is no trigger to perform a generation study at this tonnage band. No Screening test has to be conducted because a developmental toxicity study according to OECD TG 414 is available.

Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Quality of whole database:
There is no indication of toxicity to fertility based on the available data. The NOEL for systemic effects was 500 mg/kg B.W., the highest dose tested, for both sexes in a sub-actute toxicity study. Local irritation of gastric mucosa was observed in the sub-acute toxicity study at 150 mg/kg B.W. leading to a local NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect-level) of 50 mg/kg B.W. for male and female rats for N-Phenyl-N-[(trichloromethyl)thio]benzenesulphonamide after 4-week daily oral treatment by gavage. There is no indication of adverse effects on the reproductive organs in this study. In the developmental toxicity study reported below, there is no indication of maternal or developmental toxicity up to the highs dose tested. Overall, there is no indication of adverse effects on fertility based on all available data.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information

An OECD TG 414 study was performed to investigate the effects of the test item on embryonic and fetal development following repeated administration by gavage to the pregnant female during gestation including the period of organogenesis. Based on the results of the study, a dosage of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dosage tested, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the developing conceptus.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experimental Starting Date: 15 March 2017 Experimental Completion Date: 10 July 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: N-Phenyl-N-[(trichloromethyl)thio]benzenesulphonamide
Physical State/Appearance: White solid
Date Received: 04 May 2016
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark (used/formulated in light)
Expiry Date: 18 July 2017
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
A total of ninety-six time-mated female Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD (SD) IGS BR strain rats were obtained from Charles River (UK) Limited, Margate, Kent. Animals were delivered in two batches containing females prior to Day 3 of gestation. The day that positive evidence of mating was observed was designated Day 0 of gestation. At the start of treatment (Day 5) the females weighed 197 to 319g.

Animal Care and Husbandry
The animals were housed individually in solid-floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids furnished with softwood flakes (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK). The animals were allowed free access to food and water. A pelleted diet (Rodent 2018C Teklad Global Certified Diet, Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was used. Mains drinking water was supplied from polycarbonate bottles attached to the cage. Environmental enrichment was provided in the form of wooden chew blocks and cardboard fun tunnels (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK). The diet, drinking water, bedding and environmental enrichment was considered not to contain any contaminant at a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
The animals were housed in a single air-conditioned room within the Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK Barrier Maintained Rodent Facility. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen air changes per hour and the low intensity fluorescent lighting was controlled to give twelve hours continuous light and twelve hours darkness. Environmental conditions were continuously monitored by a computerized system, and print-outs of hourly mean temperatures and humidity are included in the study records. The Study Plan target ranges for temperature and relative humidity were 22 ± 3 ºC and 50 ± 20% respectively; there were no deviations from these targets.
The animals were randomly allocated to treatment groups using a randomization procedure based on stratified body weight to ensure similarity between the treatment groups. The animals were uniquely identified within the study by an ear punching system routinely used in these laboratories.
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
For the purpose of the study the test item was prepared at the appropriate concentrations as a solution/suspension in Corn Oil. The stability and homogeneity of the test item formulations were determined by Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK Analytical Services as part of Envigo Study Number YJ86PP. These investigations showed that test item formulations were stable for at least twenty one days when stored refrigerated (approximately 4 °C in the dark). Bulk formulations were therefore prepared for the study, divided into daily aliquots and stored at approximately +4 °C in the dark.


Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Samples were taken of each test item formulation and were analyzed for concentration of N Phenyl N [(trichloromethyl)thio]benzenesulphonamide at Envigo Analytical Laboratory, Shardlow. The results indicate that the prepared formulations were within 103-108% of the nominal concentration, confirming accurate formulation.

The test item concetration in the test samples was determined by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC/UV) using an external standard technique. The test item gave a chromatographic profile consisting of a single peak.

The analytical procedure was previously successfully validated with respect to specificity of chromatographic analysis, linearity of detector response, method accuracy and precision during studies YJ86PP and HL74FW. The homogeneity and stability of the test item in corn oil was also confirmed in study YJ86PP.
Details on mating procedure:
Time-mated female Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD (SD) IGS BR strain rats were obtained from Charles River (UK) Limited, Margate, Kent. Animals were delivered in two batches containing females prior to Day 3 of gestation. The day that positive evidence of mating was observed was designated Day 0 of gestation.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test item was administered from Day 5 to Day 19 of gestation, by gavage. Control animals were treated in an identical manner with the vehicle alone.
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Duration of test:
15 days from day 1 of treatment to day 19.
Dose / conc.:
250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
Low
Dose / conc.:
500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
Intermediate
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
High
No. of animals per sex per dose:
24 time mated females per dose
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
Dose selection rationale:
The dose levels were chosen based on previous toxicity data, including the N-Phenyl-N-[(trichloromethyl)thio]benzene -sulphonamide: Preliminary Oral (Gavage) Pre-Natal Development Toxicity Study in the Rat (Envigo Study number YJ86PP). The oral route was selected as the most appropriate route of exposure, based on the physical properties of the test item, and the results of the study are believed to be of value in predicting the likely toxicity of the test item to man.
Maternal examinations:
Clinical Observations
Following arrival, all animals were examined for overt signs of toxicity, ill-health or behavioral changes once daily during the gestation period. Additionally, during the dosing period, observations were recorded immediately before and soon after dosing and one hour post dosing. All observations were recorded.

Body Weight
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 3 (before the start of treatment) and on Days 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14 and 17 of gestation. Body weights were also recorded for animals at terminal kill (Day 20).

Food Consumption
Food consumption was recorded for each individual animal at Day 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20 of gestation.

Water Consumption
Water intake was observed daily by visual inspection of the water bottles for any overt changes.

Terminal Investigation
Necropsy
All animals were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation on Day 20 of gestation. All animals were subjected to a full external and internal examination and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded
Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uteri of pregnant females were removed, examined and the following data recorded:
i) Number of corpora lutea
ii) Number, position and type of intrauterine implantation
iii) Fetal sex
iv) External fetal appearance
v) Fetal weight
vi) Placental weight
vii) Gravid uterus weight
The uteri of any apparently non-pregnant females were immersed in 0.5% ammonium polysulphide solution to reveal evidence of implantation.

Implantation types were divided into:
Early Death: No visible distinction between placental/decidual tissue and embryonic tissue
Late Death: Separate embryonic/fetal and placental tissue visible
Dead Fetus: A fetus that had died shortly before necropsy. These were included in the calculation of late deaths for reporting purposes

All implantations and viable fetuses were numbered according to their intrauterine position as follows (as an example):
Left Horn Cervix Right Horn

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16
V = viable fetus
Fetal examinations:
The fetuses were killed by subcutaneous injection of sodium pentobarbitone. Fetuses from each litter were divided into two groups and examined for skeletal alterations and soft tissue alterations. Alternate fetuses were identified using an indelible marker and placed in Bouin’s fixative. Fetuses were subsequently transferred to distilled water and examined for visceral anomalies under a low power binocular microscope and then stored in 10% Buffered Formalin. The remaining fetuses were identified using cardboard tags marked with chinagraph pencil and placed into 70% IMS in distilled water. The fetuses were subsequently eviscerated, processed and the skeletons stained with alizarin red S before being transferred to 50% glycerol for examination of skeletal development and anomalies and storage.
Statistics:
The following parameters were analyzed statistically, where appropriate, using the test methods outlined below:
Body weight and body weight change (including adjustment for the contribution of the gravid uterus), food consumption, gravid uterus weight, litter data and fetal, litter and placental weights and external, visceral and skeletal observations.
Data were first analysed using Shapiro Wilk normality test and Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance. Where there was no significance, parametric methodology was applied using one way analysis of variance and, if significant, Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Where statistical significance was observed, non parametric methodology was applied using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance; and, if significant, pairwise analysis of control values against treated values using the Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test. Due to the non-normal distribution of the data, external, visceral and skeletal observations were generally analyzed using non-parametric methodology.

Probability values (p) are presented as follows:
p<0.001 ***
p<0.01 **
p<0.05 *
p≥0.05 (not significant)
Indices:
Pre and Post Implantation Loss
Percentage pre-implantation loss was calculated as:
(number of corporalutea - number of implantations / number of corporalutea) x 100
 
Percentage post-implantation loss was calculated as:
(number of implantations - number of live fetuses / number of implantations) x 100
 
Sex Ratio
Sex ratio was calculated as:
% male fetuses (sex ratio) = (number of male fetuses / total number of fetuses) x 100
Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of clinical signs observed during the study indicated any systemic effect of treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, occasional incidences of transient increased post-dosing salivation were apparent for the majority of females; this clinical sign was first apparent from Day 13 of gestation. Increased post-dosing salivation is frequently observed when animals are dosed via the oral gavage route and, at the incidence observed, was considered to reflect distaste or slight irritancy of the test item formulations rather than any systemic effect of treatment.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence):
There were no unscheduled deaths during the study.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, mean cumulative body weight gain was statistically significantly lower than control from Day 17 of gestation, although there were no statistically significant differences in mean body weight gains apparent for any particular phase of gestation. This lower cumulative body weight gain was supported by lower mean overall body weight gain when adjusted for the weight of the gravid uterus, compared to control, indicating that the observed differences in cumulative body weight gains were not attributable to differences in litter size/weight. Despite the lower cumulative body weight gain, there were no statistically significant differences from control apparent for mean body weight throughout the study.
There was no effect of treatment on body weight or body weight gain during gestation, including when adjustment of final body weight and overall body weight gain was made for the contribution of the gravid uterus, at 250 or 500 mg/kg bw/day.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, mean food consumption was statistically significantly lower than control between Days 5 to 8 of gestation. Food consumption was also slightly lower than control from Day 11 of gestation, although differences from control did not attain statistical significance.
There was no effect of treatment on food consumption during gestation at 250 or 500 mg/kg bw/day.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Daily visual inspection of water bottles did not reveal any overt intergroup differences.
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of macroscopic necropsy findings for adult animals at Day 20 of gestation indicated any effect of treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not examined
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Other effects:
not examined
Number of abortions:
not examined
Pre- and post-implantation loss:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for Pre and Post implantantion loss %.
Total litter losses by resorption:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for number of embryonic/fetal deaths.
Early or late resorptions:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for early and late numbers of embryonic/ fetal deaths
Dead fetuses:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for number of late embryonic/ fetal deaths
Changes in pregnancy duration:
not examined
Description (incidence and severity):
Not applicable as animals killed on day 20 of gestation
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not examined
Field "Description (incidence and severity)" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.DescriptionIncidenceAndSeverityEffectsOnPregnancyDuration): Not applicable, animals killed on day 20 of gestation
Changes in number of pregnant:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 1 in section 'Any other information on results' for number of pregnant females.
Other effects:
no effects observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: No adverse effect observed ate the highest dose tested.
Abnormalities:
no effects observed
Fetal body weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no effects of maternal treatment on mean fetal, litter or placental weights at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
At 500 mg/kg bw/day, mean placental weight was statistically significantly higher than control but, in the absence of any statistically significant difference at 1000 mg/kg bw/day, this finding was considered to reflect normal biological variation and was unrelated to maternal treatment.

Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): no effects observed
Field "Description (incidence and severity)" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.DescriptionIncidenceAndSeverityFetalPupBodyWeightChanges): See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for mean fetal weights.
Reduction in number of live offspring:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for number of live implants
Changes in sex ratio:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There was no effect of maternal treatment on litter data as assessed by numbers of implantations, in-utero offspring survival (as assessed by the mean numbers of early or late resorptions), live litter size and sex ratio at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
At 500 mg/kg bw/day, sex ratio (percentage male) was statistically significantly higher than control but, in the absence of any statistically significant difference at 1000 mg/kg bw/day, this finding was considered to reflect normal biological variation and was unrelated to maternal treatment.
Changes in litter size and weights:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
See Table 8 in section 'Any other information on results' for mean litter data values.
Changes in postnatal survival:
not examined
Description (incidence and severity):
Not applicable as animals killed on day 20 of gestation.
External malformations:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of findings apparent during external examination of fetuses on Day 20 of gestation indicated any obvious effect of maternal treatment on fetal development at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Skeletal malformations:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of findings apparent during detailed skeletal examination of fetuses on Day 20 of gestation indicated any obvious effect of maternal treatment on fetal development at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Visceral malformations:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of findings apparent during detailed visceral examination of fetuses on Day 20 of gestation indicated any obvious effect of maternal treatment on fetal development at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Other effects:
not examined
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no effect observed at the highest dose tested
Abnormalities:
no effects observed
Developmental effects observed:
no

Table1     Summary of Female Performance

Category

Number of Females at Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Initial Group Size

24

24

24

24

Non-pregnant

2

0

0

1

Pregnant

22

24

24

23

With live young on Day 20 of gestation

22

24

24

23

 


 

Table2     Summary Incidence of Daily Clinical Observations

 

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of animals

24

24

24

24

 

 

 

 

 

Increased post-dosing salivation

0

0

0

19

 

 

 

 

 

Mass on right side of thoracic region

0

1

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Scab on dorsal region

0

0

1

0

 

 

 

 

 

No abnormalities detected

24

23

23

5

 

 

Table 3     Group Mean Body Weight Values

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

 

Body Weight (g) on Day of Gestation

3

5

6

7

8

11

14

17

20

0 (Control)

mean

249.3

263.1

265.3

271.8

275.5

299.8

316.5

345.0

390.4

sd

27.6

28.0

28.5

28.0

28.6

30.7

32.0

33.8

39.1

n

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

250

mean

251.5

266.0

269.0

274.4

279.5

303.6

319.8

350.0

393.0

sd

23.6

23.9

23.2

24.2

24.2

26.3

25.7

29.8

32.0

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

500

mean

250.5

264.8

268.3

273.7

278.8

301.0

317.1

343.0

385.4

sd

20.9

21.3

21.4

21.7

22.0

23.8

25.3

25.8

31.0

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

23

1000

mean

251.3

266.3

269.0

273.7

278.5

300.8

309.6

334.6

378.5

sd

22.1

22.9

21.9

22.1

22.3

22.6

23.6

21.2

28.8

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

 

 

Table 4     Group Mean Body Weight Change Values 

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

 

Body Weight Change (g) during Days of Gestation

3 to 5

5 to 6

6 to 7

7 to 8

8 to 11

11 to 14

14 to 17

17 to 20

0 (Control)

mean

13.8

2.2

6.5

3.7

24.3

16.8

28.4

45.5

sd

4.3

2.7

3.5

4.5

5.2

4.9

3.4

6.9

n

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

250

mean

14.5

3.0

5.4

5.1

24.1

16.1

30.3

43.0

sd

4.0

2.7

2.7

3.2

3.8

5.8

7.4

10.2

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

500

mean

14.3

3.5

5.4

5.1

22.3

16.1

25.8

40.7

sd

4.1

2.5

4.0

2.8

4.7

7.9

8.7

11.4

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

23

1000

mean

15.0

2.7

4.7

4.9

22.3

8.8

25.0

43.9

sd

3.7

4.3

3.5

3.4

4.4

15.1

11.8

13.0

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

 

Cumulative Body Weight Change (g) from Day 5 of Gestation

5

6

7

8

11

14

17

20

0 (Control)

mean

13.8

2.2

8.7

12.4

36.7

53.5

81.9

127.3

sd

4.3

2.7

3.0

5.3

6.1

9.2

10.3

14.9

n

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

250

mean

14.5

3.0

8.4

13.5

37.6

53.7

84.0

127.0

sd

4.0

2.7

2.9

2.9

4.9

7.1

11.0

13.6

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

500

mean

14.3

3.5

8.9

14.0

36.3

52.4

78.2

120.1

sd

4.1

2.5

4.2

4.3

7.6

11.5

15.6

21.0

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

23

1000

mean

15.0

2.7

7.3

12.2

34.5

43.3

68.3**

112.2**

sd

3.7

4.3

3.6

5.1

5.5

17.2

13.9

18.5

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23


 

Table 5     Group Mean Gravid Uterus Weight and Adjusted Body Weight and Body Weight Change Values

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

 

Body Weight (g) on Days of Gestation

Body Weight Change (g) during Days of Gestation

Gravid Uterus Weight
(g)

Adjusted
Body Weight (g)
 Day 20

Adjusted
Body Weight Change (g)
5-20

5

20

5-20

0 (Control)

mean

263.9

392.0

128.1

83.765

308.2

44.3

sd

28.5

39.3

14.8

12.017

32.7

10.3

n

21

21

21

21

21

21

250

mean

265.0

391.6

126.7

84.550

307.1

42.1

sd

23.8

31.9

13.8

15.509

27.3

12.4

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

500

mean

265.3

385.4

120.1

79.373

306.1

40.7

sd

21.6

31.0

21.0

18.763

24.8

11.8

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

1000

mean

265.5

376.6

111.1**

85.787

290.8

25.3***

sd

23.2

28.1

18.2

11.368

24.5

17.0

n

22

22

22

22

22

22

 

 

Table 6     Group Mean Food Consumption Values

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

 

Food Consumption (g/rat/day) between Days of Gestation

3 - 5

5 - 8

8 - 11

11 - 14

14 - 17

17 - 20

0 (Control)

mean

23.5

21.1

22.4

23.4

25.7

26.0

sd

3.1

2.1

2.6

2.6

2.9

3.2

n

22

22

22

22

22

22

250

mean

24.5

21.1

22.5

24.3

25.9

26.6

sd

2.3

2.1

3.0

4.5

3.0

3.3

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

500

mean

24.5

20.3

22.7

22.8

23.6

27.5

sd

2.3

1.7

2.3

3.4

4.4

4.6

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

1000

mean

23.3

19.5**

23.1

21.1

23.6

24.5

sd

6.0

1.7

2.2

5.0

3.3

3.8

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

 

 

Table 7     Summary Incidence of Necropsy Findings

 

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of animals examined

24

24

24

24

 

 

 

 

 

Mammary tissue:Solid mass attached, located under right forelimb

0

1

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Stomach:Gaseous distension

0

1

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

No abnormalities detected

24

22

24

24

 


Table 8     Group Mean Litter DataValues

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

 

Number of Corpora Lutea

Number of Implants

Number of Embryonic/Fetal Deaths

Implantation Loss
%

Number of Live Implants

%
Male
Fetuses

Mean Male Fetal Weight (g)

Mean Female Fetal Weight (g)

Mean Fetal Weight (g)

MeanPlacentalWeight
(g)

Litter Weight (g)

TotalPlacentalWeight
(g)

Early

Late

Total

Pre

Post

Male

Female

Total

0 (Control)

mean

16.5

13.9

0.1

0.1

0.3

15.6

2.8

6.1

7.3

13.5

45.2

4.072

3.886

3.971

0.557

53.415

7.475

sd

3.0

2.1

0.4

0.4

0.5

13.4

4.6

1.9

1.5

2.1

10.1

0.218

0.195

0.197

0.048

8.520

1.170

n

22

22

22

22

22

21

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

22

250

mean

16.4

14.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

14.2

3.1

6.6

6.9

13.5

49.0

4.141

3.890

4.015

0.566

54.040

7.620

sd

2.7

2.7

0.3

0.4

0.5

14.9

6.2

2.4

2.3

2.8

13.5

0.405

0.349

0.357

0.062

10.806

1.676

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

500

mean

16.1

12.8

0.1

0.1

0.2

20.0

1.8

7.0

5.6

12.6

55.4*

4.250

3.980

4.123

0.610*

51.786

7.499

sd

3.0

3.3

0.3

0.3

0.4

20.1

4.1

2.4

2.5

3.3

14.3

0.311

0.340

0.320

0.087

13.580

1.817

n

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

1000

mean

16.7

14.3

0.1

0.0

0.1

13.1

0.9

7.6

6.5

14.1

54.3

4.020

3.775

3.907

0.593

55.136

8.333

sd

2.9

2.0

0.3

0.0

0.3

11.7

2.5

1.9

2.2

2.0

13.0

0.321

0.293

0.290

0.066

8.360

1.228

n

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

23

 

 

Table 9     Summary Incidence of Fetal External Findings

External Findings

Dose level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of fetuses (litters) examined

296 (22)

325 (24)

303 (24)

325 (23)

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

Total Number Affected

3

3

1.2

1

1

0.3

10

6

6.4

6

4

1.9

Small

2

2

0.8

1

1

0.3

4

2

1.3

6

4

1.9

Pale

1

1

0.3

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.3

0

0

0.0

Swollen abdomen

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.3

0

0

0.0

Placenta small

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.3

1

1

0.3

1

1

0.3

Placenta large

1

1

0.4

0

0

0.0

4

2

4.5

0

0

0.0


 

Table 10   Summary Incidence of Fetal Visceral Findings

Visceral Findings

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined

155 (22)

169 (24)

159 (24)

169 (23)

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

HEAD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rugae - non-uniform patterning

13

11

9.1

10

9

5.6

10

8

8.2

7

5

4.8

ABDOMEN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liver - additional lobe between right and left median

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

1

1

0.6

1

1

0.5

Spleen - reduced in size

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

Umbilical artery - left-sided

1

1

0.5

1

1

0.6

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

Urinary bladder - distended with fluid or gas

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

Testis - partially undescended

0

0

0.0

1

1

1.0

1

1

0.7

1

1

0.9

Ureter - kinked

15

10

9.8

6

6

3.2

8

7

6.1

10

8

5.7

Ureter - dilated - Slight/Severe

11

7

6.5

4

4

2.2

6

6

3.3

7

6

4.1

Renal pelvic cavitation - increased - Slight/Severe

6

4

4.1

0

0

0.0

5

4

4.5

1

1

0.6

Renal papilla - absent

2

2

1.3

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

THORAX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thymus - lobe partially undescended

2

2

1.3

6

6

3.4

5

5

4.2

3

3

1.6

Innominate artery - absent

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Atrium - enlarged

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

0

0

0.0

Total

31

19

20.6

25

15

13.9

22

15

16.4

23

14

13.8


 

Table 11   Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings

Skeletal Findings

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined

141 (22)

156 (24)

144 (24)

156 (23)

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

SKULL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fontanelle (anterior) - large

1

1

0.8

0

0

0.0

2

2

1.4

3

3

2.0

Nasal - incomplete ossification

8

6

6.4

14

9

8.0

3

2

1.9

6

5

3.9

Frontal - incomplete ossification

0

0

0.0

2

2

1.1

2

2

1.3

1

1

0.6

Frontal - unossified area

1

1

0.6

2

1

1.2

0

0

0.0

3

3

1.8

Frontal - sutural line

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

Parietal - incomplete ossification

6

5

4.8

5

5

3.1

4

4

2.6

4

3

2.5

Parietal/Interparietal - sutural bone

1

1

0.6

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

Interparietal - incomplete ossification

15

8

11.8

14

10

8.3

6

3

4.2

12

10

7.9

Interparietal - unossified area(s)

1

1

0.8

1

1

0.5

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Occipital (Supra-occipital) - incomplete ossification

3

3

2.7

9

9

5.2

2

2

1.4

8

6

5.1

Occipital (Supra-occipital) - unossified area(s)

2

2

1.6

3

3

1.6

6

5

5.6

4

4

2.5

Squamosal - incomplete ossification

9

6

6.0

8

7

4.6

6

6

3.9

7

6

4.3

Squamosal - unossified area(s)

1

1

0.6

5

3

2.7

5

4

2.9

0

0

0.0

Jugal - incomplete ossification

4

3

3.3

3

3

1.7

2

2

1.4

1

1

0.6

Zygomatic process of maxilla - incomplete ossification

7

5

4.8

5

5

3.2

3

3

2.0

3

3

1.8

Zygomatic process of squamosal - incomplete ossification

1

1

0.9

1

1

0.6

1

1

0.7

1

1

0.6

Premaxilla - incomplete ossification

1

1

0.9

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6


 

Table11(continued)           Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings

Skeletal Findings

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined

141 (22)

156 (24)

144 (24)

156 (23)

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

SKULL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hyoid - incomplete ossification

8

5

6.0

8

6

4.6

6

5

4.0

4

4

2.5

Hyoid - not ossified

4

4

2.4

6

4

3.3

4

4

2.7

10

4

6.3

Presphenoid - incomplete ossification

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.7

0

0

0.0

Presphenoid - not ossified

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

Basisphenoid - incomplete ossification

1

1

0.9

2

2

1.6

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

VERTEBRAL COLUMN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Odontoid - ossification present

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

2

1

1.4

0

0

0.0

Ventral arch of vertebra 1 - ossification present

52

19

36.1

59

19

36.0

64

19

47.5

64

21

40.8

Cervical (neural) arch - incomplete ossification

1

1

0.9

2

2

1.1

6

6

3.8

9

5

5.7

Thoracic centrum - incomplete ossification

1

1

0.8

8

5

4.5

11

6

8.3

4

3

2.6

Thoracic centrum - not ossified

0

0

0.0

2

1

1.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Thoracic centrum - bipartite ossification

2

2

1.5

2

2

1.2

5

4

3.3

2

2

1.3

Thoracic centrum - dumb-bell-shaped

11

8

7.2

12

10

7.0

21

11

14.7

7

5

4.4

Thoracic centrum - asymmetrically ossified

1

1

0.6

2

2

1.3

4

3

2.6

1

1

0.7

Lumbar centrum - dumb-bell-shaped

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.7

0

0

0.0

Lumbar centrum - asymmetrically ossified

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.7

0

0

0.0

Sacral (neural) arch - incomplete ossification

4

4

3.0

8

5

4.8

7

5

4.6

13

7

8.6

Sacral (neural) arch - not ossified

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Caudal vertebrae - less than 4 ossified

12

5

8.5

18

8

10.1

14

8

8.7

14

7

9.2


 

Table11(continued)           Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings

Skeletal Findings

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined

141 (22)

156 (24)

144 (24)

156 (23)

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

RIBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ossification centre - associated with 7th cervical vertebra

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

1

1

0.7

3

3

1.9

Ossification centre - associated with 1st lumbar vertebra

3

2

1.8

6

5

4.0

12

7

7.8

11

6

7.1

One or more ribs - thickened

1

1

0.9

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

Rib - short

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

0

0

0.0

Rib - rudimentary

1

1

0.9

2

2

1.3

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

Rib - misshapen

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

0

0

0.0

Costal cartilage - misaligned

1

1

0.6

3

3

1.6

3

3

2.0

8

6

4.8

Costal cartilage - not fused to sternebra

12

7

9.6

14

10

9.4

9

6

5.7

7

5

4.2

STERNEBRAE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sternebra - incomplete ossification

0

0

0.0

2

2

1.0

1

1

0.6

1

1

0.6

Sternebra - not ossified

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

Sternebra - bipartite ossification

1

1

0.9

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

2

2

1.2

Sternebra - misaligned

5

4

3.4

5

4

3.3

5

5

3.3

5

4

3.3

Sternum - split

0

0

0.0

1

1

1.0

1

1

0.5

1

1

0.6

Sternum - split - cartilage only

0

0

0.0

1

1

1.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Xiphoid cartilage - split

0

0

0.0

1

1

1.0

1

1

0.5

0

0

0.0

Xiphoid cartilage - partially split

4

4

2.9

14

11

9.4

9

5

5.8

7

6

4.6


 

Table11(continued)           Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings

Skeletal Findings

Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day)

0 (Control)

250

500

1000

Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined

141 (22)

156 (24)

144 (24)

156 (23)

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

NF

NL

%†

PECTORAL GIRDLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scapula - misshapen

8

5

5.7

2

2

1.3

6

5

3.8

5

3

3.2

PELVIC GIRDLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ischium - incomplete ossification

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

Pubis - not ossified

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.5

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Pubis - incomplete ossification

2

1

1.5

1

1

0.6

2

2

1.3

6

3

3.7

FORELIMBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metacarpal - not ossified

16

11

11.7

17

11

10.2

21

10

13.3

27

11

17.2

Metacarpal - incomplete ossification

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

2

2

1.2

Forepaw phalanges - 1 or more - ossified

26

11

18.6

46

17

30.5

41

18

31.7

53

14

32.1

Humerus - incomplete ossification

3

3

2.0

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.7

1

1

0.6

Humerus - hole

2

2

1.4

0

0

0.0

2

2

2.0

0

0

0.0

HINDLIMBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metatarsal - 1st - ossified

4

3

2.8

3

3

1.8

4

3

2.7

6

3

3.5

Metatarsal - incomplete ossification

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

2

2

1.4

0

0

0.0

Femur - incomplete ossification

7

4

5.2

5

4

3.0

6

5

6.8

11

4

6.8

Tarsal flexure - cartilage – severe

0

0

0.0

1

1

0.6

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

Total

111

22

79.1

134

24

84.2

120

23

85.3

129

23

82.0

NOTE: a fetus may appear in more than one category

Conclusions:
Based on the results of the study, a dosage of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dosage tested, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the developing conceptus.
Executive summary:

Introduction

The study was performed to investigate the effects of the test item on embryonic and fetal development following repeated administration by gavage to the pregnant female during gestation including the period of organogenesis.

The study was designed to comply with the following guidelines:

·        US EPA Health Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 870.3700, ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (August 1998)

·        Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Testing guidelines for Toxicology studies, 12 NohSan No 8147, (24 November 2000)

·        OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No 414, ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (adopted 22 January 2001)

·        Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 test methods pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

Methods

The test item was administered by gavage to three groups each of twenty-four time mated Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD®(SD) IGS BR strain rats, between Days 5 and 19 of gestation inclusive at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. A further group of twenty-four time mated females was exposed to the vehicle only (Corn oil) to serve as a control.

Clinical signs, body weight change, food and water consumptions were monitored during the study. 

All females were terminated on Day 20 of gestation and subjected to gross necropsy including examination of the uterine contents. The number of corpora lutea, number, position and type of implantation, placental weights, fetal weight, sex and external and internal macroscopic appearance were recorded. Half of each litter were examined for detailed skeletal development and the remaining half were subjected to detailed visceral examination.

Results

Adult Responses

Mortality

There were no unscheduled deaths during the study.

Clinical Observations

Clinical signs were generally restricted to occasional incidences of transient increased post-dosing salivation for the majority of females at 1000 mg/kg bw/day and did not indicate any systemic effect of treatment.  

Body Weight

At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, mean cumulative body weight gain was statistically significantly lower than control from Day 17 of gestation and overall body weight gain remained statistically significantly lower than control, when adjusted for the contribution of the gravid uterus. 

There was no effect of treatment on body weight or body weight gain during gestation, including when adjustment of final body weight and overall body weight gain was made for the contribution of the gravid uterus, at 250 or 500 mg/kg bw/day.

Food Consumption

At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, mean food consumption was statistically significantly lower than control between Days 5 to 8 of gestation. 

There was no effect of treatment on food consumption during gestation at 250 or 500 mg/kg bw/day.

Post Mortem Studies

Macroscopic necropsy findings for adult animals at Day 20 of gestation did not indicate any effect of treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Litter Responses

Litter Data

There was no effect of maternal treatment on litter data as assessed by numbers of implantations, in-utero offspring survival (as assessed by the mean numbers of early or late resorptions), live litter size and sex ratio at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Litter, Placental and Fetal Weights

There were no effects of maternal treatment on mean fetal, litter or placental weights at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Fetal Evaluation

External Examinations

External examination of fetuses at Day 20 of gestation did not indicate any effect of maternal treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Detailed Visceral Examinations

Detailed visceral examinations of fetuses at Day 20 of gestation did not indicate any effect of maternal treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Detailed Skeletal Examinations

Detailed skeletal examinations of fetuses at Day 20 of gestation did not indicate any effect of maternal treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the study, a dosage of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dosage tested, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the developing conceptus.

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
An OECD TG 414 study was performed to investigate the effects of the test item on embryonic and fetal development following repeated administration by gavage to the pregnant female during gestation including the period of organogenesis.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

An OECD TG 414 study was performed to investigate the effects of the test item on embryonic and fetal development following repeated administration by gavage to the pregnant female during gestation including the period of organogenesis.

Methods

The test item was administered by gavage to three groups each of twenty-four time mated Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD®(SD) IGS BR strain rats, between Days 5 and 19 of gestation inclusive at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. A further group of twenty-four time mated females was exposed to the vehicle only (Corn oil) to serve as a control.

Clinical signs, body weight change, food and water consumptions were monitored during the study.

All females were terminated on Day 20 of gestation and subjected to gross necropsy including examination of the uterine contents. The number of corpora lutea, number, position and type of implantation, placental weights, fetal weight, sex and external and internal macroscopic appearance were recorded. Half of each litter were examined for detailed skeletal development and the remaining half were subjected to detailed visceral examination.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the study, a dosage of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dosage tested, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the developing conceptus.

Justification for classification or non-classification

No classification is warranted; based on the results of the study, a dosage of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dosage tested, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the developing conceptus.

Additional information