Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 400-600-6 | CAS number: 71868-10-5 ACETOCURE 97; GENOCURE*PMP; IGM 4817; IRGACURE 907; SPEEDCURE 97
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.82 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 70.5 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Absorption is considered to be comparable via all routes, therefore no modification of the starting dose descriptor (oral route) is considered appropriate.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- corrected NOAEL worker: 40 mg/kg bw / 0.38*0.67
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.4 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The substance causes no local effects and systemic uptake is considered comparable for all routes of exposure.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
1. Identification of relevant dose descriptor
In a combined OECD 414/415 study the test item caused maternal toxicity and influenced fertility of the dams. The NOAEL for the parental generation is considered to be 40 mg/kg bw.
2. Mode of action
No non-threshold mode of action is associated with the test substance. In particular, the test substance has no genotoxic potential.
3. Application of assessment factors
Allometric scaling: rat to human = 4
Interspecies factor (remaining differences): 2.5
Intraspecies factor: worker = 5, general population = 10
Exposure duration subacute to chronic: 6
Quality of data base: 1
Dose response: 1
4. Daily exposure
Worker: exposed for 8h
General population: exposed for 24h
Calculation of DNEL bases upon Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption, European Commission, 2004 and Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health, may 2008
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.7 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 34.8 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL to NOAEC: 40 mg/kg bw / 1.15
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
1. Identification of relevant dose descriptor
In a combined OECD 414/415 study the test item caused maternal toxicity and influenced fertility of the dams. The NOAEL for the parental generation is considered to be 40 mg/kg bw.
2. Mode of action
No non-threshold mode of action is associated with the test substance. In particular, the test substance has no genotoxic potential.
3. Application of assessment factors
Allometric scaling: rat to human = 4
Interspecies factor (remaining differences): 2.5
Intraspecies factor: worker = 5, general population = 10
Exposure duration subacute to chronic: 6
Quality of data base: 1
Dose response: 1
4. Daily exposure
Worker: exposed for 8h
General population: exposed for 24h
Calculation of DNEL bases upon Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption, European Commission, 2004 and Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health, may 2008
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
